Re: RFS: fgrun

2011-03-23 Thread Chris
Hi all, I have now fixed the issues mentioned by Scott and uploaded the revised package to the mentors website. Thanks, Chris signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: phing (third try)

2011-03-23 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phing". > > * Package name: phing > Version : 2.4.5-1 > Upstream Author : Hans Lellelid , Michiel Rook < > mr...@php.net> > * URL : http://phing.info/ > * License : LGPL

Re: On diverting an ITP to non-free

2011-03-23 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! * Mats Erik Andersson [110323 12:29]: > Not imagining myself to ever intend to bother about the > non-free category, I am now prepared to make an exception, > butvI run into the problem of understanding whether my > packaging should mark this as non-free, or if my sponsor > simply deposits t

RFS: pms (updated package)

2011-03-23 Thread Benoît Knecht
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.42-0.1 of my package "pms". It builds these binary packages: pms- Practical Music Search, an MPD client The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 551619, 612192, 615003 This version was relea

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package)

2011-03-23 Thread Benoît Knecht
Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi Benoît, > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.18-5 > > of my package "minidlna". > > > [...] > > Looks pretty good, and I really like the fact that multiple people seem to be > working on it, makes package maintenance a lot more future-proof :-)

Re: On diverting an ITP to non-free

2011-03-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Paul Wise wrote: > If it is just the documentation that is non-free and upstream refuses > to drop the invariant sections, I would suggest to either drop it or > split it out into a non-free source package. Split it to a non-free source package, please. Debian's quality suffe

Re: On diverting an ITP to non-free

2011-03-23 Thread Paul Wise
If it is just the documentation that is non-free and upstream refuses to drop the invariant sections, I would suggest to either drop it or split it out into a non-free source package. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.

On diverting an ITP to non-free

2011-03-23 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Dear all, I have already put much work into fulfilling an RFP on GNU Rush, only to be made aware by the FTP-masters of the fact that the package source includes a texinfo document (and no manual pages), which contains an implicitly Invariant Sectionsince it allows distribution __with__ front-cover

RFS: wmmixer (orphaned package) [try 2]

2011-03-23 Thread Rodolfo kix Garcia
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the orphaned package wmmixer. The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload will fix the bug #490739 It updates the packaging to 3.9.1 standard and compatibility 7 Support multiple config files and X Classes [Closes: #454286] Deleted README.sou