Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-08 Thread Julien Valroff
Hi Emilien, Le samedi 09 avril 2011 à 00:05:35 (+0200 CEST), Emilien Klein a écrit : > Hi Julien, > > Thanks for your answer, which I just read (I am not subscribed to the > mentors mailing list) Then please, state it in your messages so that I (we) can CC you. > I will update the package accor

Re: RFS: python-crypto (adopting package, fixes FTBFS)

2011-04-08 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Sebastian Ramacher , 2011-03-18, 12:32: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-crypto/python-crypto_2.3-1.dsc I won't sponsor your package (sorry, I feel deep antipathy towards dh_python2), but here's my quick review: * Please consider joining Debian Python Modules Team[0] and

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Similar to why 0 A.D. needs libenet 1.2; Philip explained earlier that 0 > A.D. needs a specific version of Spidermonkey (1.8.5) in order to maintain > compatibility, since it uses advanced Spidermonkey features and users with > different ver

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-08 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Julien, Thanks for your answer, which I just read (I am not subscribed to the mentors mailing list) I will update the package according to your comments. Question: do I need to continue replying to the list also, or should we continue this discussion off-list? Tthanks, +Emilien -- To UN

Re: RFS: quakespasm (2nd try)

2011-04-08 Thread David Banks
Hi Jon, On 07/04/11 22:55, Jon Dowland wrote: Sorry I missed your first RFP. I have now added basic quake support to game-data-packager and made an upload to experimental. I will hopefully give your package a look real soon and get it uploaded! Thanks for looking at this. I guess we would w

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-08 Thread Philip Taylor
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 04:33:47PM +0100, Philip Taylor wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Paul Wise wrote: >> > Preferably you would render text at run-time, since that >> > enables i18n. For finding font files use fontconfig (preferr

Gratis por TIEMPO LIMITADO

2011-04-08 Thread Curso Gratuito
4/8/2011 13:27:21 Todo propietario de un sitio web sabe que conseguir visitantes para el mismo es una tarea dura, y difícil, pero importantísima. El estar bien ubicado en los buscadores es una parte fundamental de la promoción de cualquier sitio web. Debido a que pensamos que el tema puede ser

Re: /usr/include/linux/videodev.h

2011-04-08 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-04-08 16:18 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Does anyone knows where /usr/include/linux/videodev.h has gone ? It > has disappear from the latest linux-libc-dev package in sid. It has been removed in Linux 2.6.38 (commit 88ae7624a6fe890e5a8ca57b25420f66e1389f8b in Linus' tree). Sven

/usr/include/linux/videodev.h

2011-04-08 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi all, Does anyone knows where /usr/include/linux/videodev.h has gone ? It has disappear from the latest linux-libc-dev package in sid. Thanks -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-08 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Philip Taylor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Ansgar Burchardt > wrote: > > For Ubuntu users, upstream could include the newer enet in their PPA. > > The packages containing the library itself are co-installable, only the > > -dev packages for enet 1.2 an

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-08 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Hi, > > Vincent Cheng writes: > > - package libenet1.2, and replace 0ad's build dependency on > > libenet-dev with this new package > > We just got rid of enet 1.2 in testing a few days ago and I prefer to > have just a single version per

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-08 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Vincent Cheng > wrote: > > > - package libenet1.2, and replace 0ad's build dependency on libenet-dev > with > > this new package > > I'd prefer to have only one version of enet in Debian, but I > understand the