Re: RFS: nvidia-cg-toolkit (updated package)

2011-05-03 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Andres (2011.05.03_05:51:51_+0200) > Also, I believe the license could allow nvidia-cg-toolkit sources and > binaries to be included in non-free, thus there would be no need for > the downloader tool. I made that change in Ubuntu, and would be glad to see it happen here too. nvidia-cg-toolkit i

RFS: torrentflux-b4rt

2011-05-03 Thread Panayiotis Karabassis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "torrentflux-b4rt". * Package name: torrentflux-b4rt Version : 1.0-beta2-1 Upstream Author : Many, listed in copyright file * URL : http://tf-b4rt.berlios.de/ * Licen

[OT] Re: RFS: opencpn

2011-05-03 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:15:47AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > Hmm, it's very, very rare that I find myself disagreeing with Paul > > Wise[0] > > Hmm, whats [0]? Oops, sorry; I wasn't aiming for mysteeerious :/ Just thought I'd split m

Re: RFS: nvidia-cg-toolkit (updated package)

2011-05-03 Thread Andreas Beckmann
[Adding Cc: Federico Di Gregorio as he is the current maintainer] On 2011-05-03 05:32, Russ Allbery wrote: > Michael Tautschnig writes: > >> Hi Miguel, > >>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0.0015-0.1 >>> of my package "nvidia-cg-toolkit". >>> >> [...] > >> You seem to be putt

Re: RFS: gtkpod (updated package)

2011-05-03 Thread Etienne Millon
Well, the joys of sid :) I'll review this package after the transition is done. > > [about libgtkpod-dev] > Because I've never thought it could be used by any other software, since > it was part of a specific source package. It is quite common to distribute the whole software (client, library, h

Re: RFS: nvidia-cg-toolkit (updated package)

2011-05-03 Thread Miguel Colon
Hi all: Since I received 3 email within the last 24 hours I will try to answer all the question here. I started this package over a year ago and made packages for 6-7 nvidia toolkit releases while merging the changelog so I might not remember all the reasons I did things like that since I never m

RFS: bgkiller

2011-05-03 Thread Rahul Bedarkar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bgkiller". * Package name: bgkiller Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Rahul S. Bedarkar * URL : http://rpal143.wordpress.com/bgkiller * License : GNU GPL v3 Section : utils It builds these bina

Re: RFS: bgkiller

2011-05-03 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hi Rahul, On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 20:28 +0530, Rahul Bedarkar wrote: > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bgkiller > > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget > h

Re: RFS: gtk2-engines-equinox

2011-05-03 Thread Maia Kozheva
Any progress on this? There is also a gtk2-engines-equinox package in Ubuntu already (I packaged it independently before that); perhaps it would be worth basing your package on that instead of reinventing the wheel? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Debexpo deloyment etc. updates

2011-05-03 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Some updates from my debexpo work this morning: (I'm CC:ing debian-mentors so people there know what's up.) * I see that Andrey has rebased his patches onto the current git repo on Alioth. Yay! * We have a Jenkins instance that will notice git updates and automatically build debexpo. Right n

RFS: juffed (updated package, to experimental)

2011-05-03 Thread Maia Kozheva
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.1137-1 of my package "juffed". (This version is targeted to experimental.) If it is okay by you, being a DM, I have set the DM-Upload-Allowed flag on the new package, so I will not need to ask for a sponsor for it again. It builds

Re: RFS: gtkpod (updated package)

2011-05-03 Thread Maia Kozheva
For what it's worth, upstream maintains a PPA for Ubuntu that does include a libgtkpod-dev package for 2.0.0. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: RFS: libchart-php

2011-05-03 Thread Daniel Lombraña González
Dear Michael, Thanks for your advice. I will try to fix this problem, and upload a new version. Regards, Daniel 2011/5/1 Michael Tautschnig > [...] > > > Well, it seems to me that this information is better suited for the > > > patch header and the changelog (I want to know about that when I'

Re: RFS: gtk2-engines-equinox

2011-05-03 Thread Andrew O. Shadoura
Hello, On Tue, 3 May 2011 23:37:13 +0700 Maia Kozheva wrote: > Any progress on this? There is also a gtk2-engines-equinox package in > Ubuntu already (I packaged it independently before that); perhaps it > would be worth basing your package on that instead of reinventing the > wheel? Why don't

Re: RFS: gtk2-engines-equinox

2011-05-03 Thread Andrew O. Shadoura
Hello, On Tue, 3 May 2011 23:24:18 +0300 "Andrew O. Shadoura" wrote: > Why don't you just becoma a maintainer of it in Debian too? Become, even. Anyway, it'd be easier to keep the two packages in sync. -- WBR, Andrew signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: qca-cyrus-sasl - Cyrus SASL plugin for Qt Cryptographic Architecture

2011-05-03 Thread Vsevolod Velichko
Hi, 2011/5/1 Michael Tautschnig > > > > > * Package name    : qca-cyrus-sasl > >   Version         : 2.0.0-beta3-1 > > I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "qca-cyrus-sasl". > [...] > > > Sorry for the massive delay until anyone got around to review your package. I > finally did so, built, an

What to do about libofx?

2011-05-03 Thread Bryan Donlan
The package libofx has not been updated in three years, and has severe outstanding (fixed in upstream) crash bugs against it. The result of this is that gnucash will crash if one attempts to import data from american express into it. It appears that upstream has tried contacting the maintainer[1] r

Re: What to do about libofx?

2011-05-03 Thread Paul Wise
Thomas looks quite MIA, please follow these procedures: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/beyond-pkging.html#mia-qa Generally you should be building and testing on whatever suite you hope to get it uploaded to. If you are able to do your testing in a VM, that would probably be enough

Re: What to do about libofx?

2011-05-03 Thread Bryan Donlan
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 22:27, Paul Wise wrote: > Thomas looks quite MIA, please follow these procedures: > > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/beyond-pkging.html#mia-qa > > Generally you should be building and testing on whatever suite you > hope to get it uploaded to. If you are able

Re: What to do about libofx?

2011-05-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Bryan Donlan wrote: > The document you linked asks me to collect some information > (mia-query, echelon) that's only available to debian account holders - > I'll have to make do with what public information I can find. > I guess I'll just follow the contact schedu

Re: What to do about libofx?

2011-05-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
I believe the new gnucash maintainer is planning to work on libofx as well for this reason. On May 3, 2011 6:47 PM, "Bryan Donlan" wrote: > The package libofx has not been updated in three years, and has severe > outstanding (fixed in upstream) crash bugs against it. The result of > this is that g

Re: What to do about libofx?

2011-05-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
I don't recall any minimum level of activity. I'm happy to hand the package to anyone willing to care for it better than I have been able. But please check with the gnucach maintainer first. Thomas On May 3, 2011 8:12 PM, "Paul Wise" wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Bryan Donlan wrote:

Re: What to do about libofx?

2011-05-03 Thread Bryan Donlan
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 00:17, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > I don't recall any minimum level of activity. I'm happy to hand the package > to anyone willing to care for it better than I have been able. But please > check with the gnucach maintainer first. Okay, will do. Thanks, Bryan -- To UN

Re: RFS: gtk2-engines-equinox

2011-05-03 Thread Maia Kozheva
I suppose I could. What about Hadret's original ITP, though? Perhaps I should contact him first? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599658 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian