Re: Debian Packaging Tutorial

2011-05-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/05/11 at 13:37 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Lucas Nussbaum > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I’ve been working on a Debian packaging tutorial. It is composed of > > about 60 slides providing a throughout overview of Debian packaging. > > > > It now reached the poin

Re: Debian Packaging Tutorial

2011-05-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/05/11 at 17:54 +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 16:57 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, > [...] > > > > http://git.debian.org/?p=users/lucas/packaging-tutorial.git;a=blob_plain;f=packaging-tutorial.pdf;hb=refs/heads/pdf > > It's an interesting and u

Re: When to update public key?

2011-05-06 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-05-06 03:35, Andres Mejia wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to update my outdated public key signed by one DD (it's a 1024D key). > I > already have a new key (4096R key) signed by at least one other DD (not the > same DD). I've signed my new

RFS: steadyflow

2011-05-06 Thread Maia Kozheva
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "steadyflow". * Package name: steadyflow Version : 0.1.6-1 Upstream Author : Maia Kozheva * URL : https://launchpad.net/steadyflow * License : GPL-3+ Section : net It builds these binary packag

Re: RFS: steadyflow

2011-05-06 Thread Maia Kozheva
In addition, since I'm a DM, I would like the DM-Upload-Allowed flag set on this package, if this is acceptable. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

RFS: rsplib-2.7.11 (implementation of the IETF RSerPool framework and example applications)

2011-05-06 Thread Thomas Dreibholz
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rsplib". RSPLIB is the Open Source implementation (GPLv3) of the IETF's new framework for Reliable Server Pooling (RSerPool), which is described in RFC 5351 to RFC 5356. If you a looking for a Grid compution solution which is simple, easy

Re: RFS: rsplib-2.7.11 (implementation of the IETF RSerPool framework and example applications)

2011-05-06 Thread Mahyuddin Susanto
On 05/06/2011 04:55 PM, Thomas Dreibholz wrote: > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rsplib > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian

Re: RFS: gtkpod (updated package)

2011-05-06 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
On 03/05/2011 19:17, Maia Kozheva wrote: > For what it's worth, upstream maintains a PPA for Ubuntu that does include a > libgtkpod-dev package for 2.0.0. OK, thanks for the info. -- Ing. Matteo F. Vescovi -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da Mai

Re: Debian Packaging Tutorial

2011-05-06 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 05/05/2011 10:57 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > I’ve been working on a Debian packaging tutorial. It is composed of > about 60 slides providing a throughout overview of Debian packaging. > > It now reached the point where I consider it ready for use, and I am > looking forward to reviews an

Re: Debian Packaging Tutorial

2011-05-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 06/05/11 at 19:15 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 05/05/2011 10:57 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I’ve been working on a Debian packaging tutorial. It is composed of > > about 60 slides providing a throughout overview of Debian packaging. > > > > It now reached the point where I con

RFS: b43-fwcutter (updated package)

2011-05-06 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:014-3 of my package "b43-fwcutter". It builds these binary packages: b43-fwcutter - Utility for extracting Broadcom 43xx firmware firmware-b43-installer - Installer package for firmware for the b43 driver firmware-b43-lpphy-installer

Re: RFS: b43-fwcutter (updated package)

2011-05-06 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 06.05.2011 17:05, schrieb Fabrizio Regalli: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:014-3 of my package "b43-fwcutter". It builds these binary packages: b43-fwcutter - Utility for extracting Broadcom 43xx firmware firmware-b43-installer - Installer package for firmwar

Re: RFS: b43-fwcutter (updated package)

2011-05-06 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hey Patrick! On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 17:12 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > I will care about the package. The next time you may direct mail me ;-) > Great! Thank you as usual :-) Cheers, Fabrizio. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: rsplib-2.7.11 (implementation of the IETF RSerPool framework and example applications)

2011-05-06 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 06 May 2011 13:32:41 Mahyuddin Susanto wrote: > On 05/06/2011 04:55 PM, Thomas Dreibholz wrote: > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rsplib > > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > >

RFS: gtkpod (updated package)

2011-05-06 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.1-1 of my package "gtkpod". This is the last upstream release of a package already in Debian. It builds these binary packages: gtkpod- manage songs and playlists on an Apple iP

RFS: nzbget

2011-05-06 Thread Andreas Moog
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nzbget". * Package name: nzbget Version : 0.7.0-1 Upstream Author : Andrei Prygounkov * URL : http://nzbget.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-2 Section : net It builds these binary packages: nzb

Re: RFS: gordon

2011-05-06 Thread Michael Gilbert
Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gordon". > > > > * Package name: gordon > > Version : 0~git20101011-1 > > Section : utils > > > [...] > > I had previously reviewed that package; sorry for taking so long for yet >

Re: RFS: lastfmlib

2011-05-06 Thread Andreas Noteng
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/01/2011 03:15 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > First of all: I have no idea where this "somewhere" is, and indeed I find that > naming *of the source package* very strange. This naming requirement is true > for > the binary packages, however, a