Hi,
I am working on packaging a Java application called BT747 [0]. For now,
I have some doubts (I think I'll have more in the future ;-)):
* Licenses: this package has quite a lot of licenses, one of the
licenses is GPL (without the version). Is it a problem? The exact header
is:
/**
*
Yep, package any embedded code copies separately.
For modified code copies, try to get the changes into their proper
upstream or the Debian package if it exists. Then depend on that
version.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mònica
* Licenses: this package has quite a lot of licenses, one of the
licenses is GPL (without the version). Is it a problem? The exact header
is:
This is no problem. GPL states (verbatim quote from GPL-2, still present
in GPL-3):
If the
El dg 15 de 05 de 2011 a les 19:08 +0800, en/na Paul Wise va escriure:
Yep, package any embedded code copies separately.
For modified code copies, try to get the changes into their proper
upstream or the Debian package if it exists.
Ok, I'll try it, altough this library doesn't exist in
El dg 15 de 05 de 2011 a les 13:10 +0200, en/na Arno Töll va escriure:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mònica
* Licenses: this package has quite a lot of licenses, one of the
licenses is GPL (without the version). Is it a problem? The exact header
is:
This is no
Hello Monica,
interesting that you're now working on bt747: I'm also using this
program to download my GPS tracks and flag my photos, wanted as well to
package it, and basically silently gave up as I looked into it :-P
Anyway I'm happy that someone has more courage and/or time to do it!
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mònica,
On 15.05.2011 13:40, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
So, thinking in DEP5: If I choose GPL-3.0+, what should I write in the
description of the license? (Suppose I have the GPL-3.0+ already
detailed):
The GPL paragraph I cited does not
On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:48:07 Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hello Monica,
Hi,
interesting that you're now working on bt747: I'm also using this
program to download my GPS tracks and flag my photos, wanted as well to
package it, and basically silently gave up as I looked into it :-P
I'd actually
On 05/14/2011 12:38 PM, Andreas Moog wrote:
GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
for all files and I don't know if this will be a problem preventing the
package from inclusion in the archive.
I for one don't care, though I've no idea about the ftp-master position.
A few days ago
Hi Jakub
On Sun, 15 May 2011 03:15:12 +0200, Jakub wrote:
I won't sponsor your package, as I'm not a GNOME user, so I'm not
really qualified (BTW, did you try to contact your previous sponsor?),
(No, I haven't - it came about in a roundabout way; I had a contact with
someone who doesn't
Hello,
On Sat, 14 May 2011 14:05:01 +0400
Dmitry Shachnev mity...@gmail.com wrote:
override_dh_auto_clean:
dh_auto_clean
rm -rf debian/icons
rm -f retext
rm -f wpgen/wpgen
Dmitry Shachnev
You can use the debian/clean file. No need to add any overrides ;)
--
Am Samstag, 14. Mai 2011 schrieb Rainer Dorsch:
I declared victory too early.
Am Freitag, 13. Mai 2011 schrieb Rainer Dorsch:
rd@blackbox:/scratchbox/users/rd/home/rd/20110506/navit-0.2.0+dfsg.1$
grep freetype debian/rules
DEB_MAKE_ENVVARS = LDFLAGS=-rpath=/opt/freetype-navit
Hello,
I'm having trouble coming up with a decent workflow for creating
packages. I am managing the debian/ directory in a mercurial repository,
and at the moment my steps for releasing a new version are:
1. Download the new upstream source
2. Rename to .orig.tar.bz2, extract, rename created
Dear mentors,
First, I want to say I'm grateful to DD, DM and others for reviews they made.
Thank you Michael Tautschnig for sponsoring mpd-sima.
A new upstream version has been released, I am looking for reviews and a
sponsor for the new version 0.8.0-1 of my package mpd-sima.
It builds these
* Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by, 2011-05-15, 17:54:
override_dh_auto_clean:
dh_auto_clean
rm -rf debian/icons
rm -f retext
rm -f wpgen/wpgen
Dmitry Shachnev
You can use the debian/clean file. No need to add any overrides ;)
However, you can't remove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
please reply with the debian-mentors list in CC (at least). This helps
other people to keep track. You can, but you don't need to address me
personally as I'm subscribed there as well.
On 15.05.2011 16:56, Peter Bennett wrote:
Since I am
Hello,
On Sun, 15 May 2011 17:19:22 +0200
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
rm -rf debian/icons
You can use the debian/clean file. No need to add any overrides ;)
However, you can't remove directories via debian/clean, and I assume
that debian/icons is a directory.
You can remove
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:46:00AM -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Am I missing a tool? Or is a bad idea to try to manage debian/ in a VCS?
Or should my repo also include the upstream source rather than just the
debian directory?
I've never been a big fan of having just the debian/ directory
under
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:46:00AM -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Am I missing a tool?
svn users use svn-buildpackage to store only debian/ in VCS, so yes.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Nikolaus, mentors,
Le 15/05/2011 16:46, Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
Hello,
I'm having trouble coming up with a decent workflow for creating
packages. I am managing the debian/ directory in a mercurial repository,
[…]
I've recently discovered mercurial-buildpackage, I'm not using it though:
From: Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: RFS: dylandotnet (updated package)
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 11.2.7.1-3
of my package dylandotnet.
It builds these binary packages:
dylandotnet - This is the dylan.NET
Geoff mxondeb...@free.fr writes:
Hi Nikolaus, mentors,
Le 15/05/2011 16:46, Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
Hello,
I'm having trouble coming up with a decent workflow for creating
packages. I am managing the debian/ directory in a mercurial repository,
[…]
I've recently discovered
Hi,
I'm trying to create a new package of The Unarchiver. When I build it
in unstable, it generates the following warning and the resulting
executables hang when run:
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libobjc.so.2, needed by
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6.1/../../../../lib/libgnustep-base.so, may
Hi again,
El dg 15 de 05 de 2011 a les 15:49 +0300, en/na George Danchev va
escriure:
On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:48:07 Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hello Monica,
Hi,
interesting that you're now working on bt747: I'm also using this
program to download my GPS tracks and flag my photos, wanted as
Mònica Ramírez Arceda mon...@probeta.net writes:
Perfect!
So, thinking in DEP5: If I choose GPL-3.0+, what should I write in the
description of the license? (Suppose I have the GPL-3.0+ already
detailed):
I would record the license as GPL-1+. That's really what that declaration
means
On 15.05.2011 16:56, Peter Bennett wrote:
Since I am the upstream developer I can make any necessary changes
upstream so I thought it would be easier to make a native package.
Otherwise I have to start learning quilt and other things. Perhaps I
am wring in my understanding.
Please don't
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package manaplus.
* Package name : manaplus
Version : 1.1.5.15-1
Upstream Author : Andrei Karas
* URL : http://manaplus.evolonline.org/
* License : GPL v2
Section : games
It builds these binary packages:
manaplus - Extended client for The Mana World
On Sunday 15 May 2011 21:01:44 Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
Hi,
To be honest, I had the same problem as you with Freeplane and JOrtho,
and I decided to keep JOrtho as part of the freeplane package, under
the binary name libjortho-freeplane-java.
The reasons were:
- JOrtho was not
Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org writes:
I'm having trouble coming up with a decent workflow for creating
packages. I am managing the debian/ directory in a mercurial
repository,
Contrary to other replies in this thread, I find that to be a cleaner
setup: manage just ‘debian/’ in a VCS
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Matt Kraai kr...@ftbfs.org wrote:
I'm trying to create a new package of The Unarchiver.
Thanks!
How are you building it? I took a look and gave up when I saw it has
no makefiles, only an Xcode project and the GNUStep pbxbuild (that
translates Xcode stuff to
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:22 AM, andrei karas aka...@inbox.ru wrote:
Section : games
You might want to join the Debian games team and help out with other games too:
http://wiki.debian.org/Games/Team
Jump on our IRC channel and we will walk you through the process.
We are also
31 matches
Mail list logo
