RFS: tartarus

2011-05-25 Thread Stefan Tomanek
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tartarus". * Package name: tartarus Version : 0.9.8-1 Upstream Author : Stefan Tomanek * URL : http://wertarbyte.de/tartarus.shtml * License : GPLv3 or later Section : admin It builds these bi

Re: Avoiding useless library dependencies

2011-05-25 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Goswin von Brederlow writes: > Paul Wise writes: > >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Paul Wise wrote: >>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >>> What's the proper way to fix this warning? >>> >>> Get this bug fixed: >> >> An addendum, fuse looks like it needs a new mai

RFS: tartarus

2011-05-25 Thread Stefan Tomanek
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tartarus". * Package name: tartarus Version : 0.9.8-1 Upstream Author : Stefan Tomanek * URL : http://wertarbyte.de/tartarus.shtml * License : GPLv3 or later Section : admin It builds these bi

Re: What to do about the situation with id3v2

2011-05-25 Thread Andrew O. Shadoura
Hello, On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:10:35 +0200 Stefan Ott wrote: > - Port id3v2 to libid3tag [5]. This is a different id3 tagging library > which supports v2.4 tags. I did some work in this direction but I > realized that this would require major modifications to id3v2 since > it's closely modeled ar

Re: [imagemagick] Strange bug in one of my packages need help (maybe glibc bug?)

2011-05-25 Thread Roger Leigh
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:20:09PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Hi, > > I have two strange bug in my package imagemagick. I am really clueless about > these.upstream have no idea also. Any help welcome > see #625250 % c++filt _ZNSt14error_categoryD2Ev std::error_category::~error_category

Re: Problem with uscan --repack

2011-05-25 Thread Daniele Tricoli
Hi Christian, On Wednesday 25 May 2011 10:37:42 Christian Kastner wrote: > This is a regression introduced by devscripts 2.10.72. I supplied a > fix for some other issues (see #615108), and it appears to have been > incomplete as the --destdir option no longer works with relative paths. > I'll re

[imagemagick] Strange bug in one of my packages need help (maybe glibc bug?)

2011-05-25 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi, I have two strange bug in my package imagemagick. I am really clueless about these.upstream have no idea also. Any help welcome see #625250 and #622591. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..

Re: RFS: gtklp 1.2.8-1 (updated package)

2011-05-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:17:12PM +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.8-1 > of my package "gtklp". * Double builds leave some modified m4 files in the diff. (I consider this whole 'autoreconf & delete the files in clean' thing a bit hackish bu

Re: Problem with uscan --repack

2011-05-25 Thread Christian Kastner
On Wed, 25 May 2011 06:48:56 +0200, Daniele Tricoli wrote: Hi all, I'm taking care of python-peak.util (under the umbrella of DPMT) and to close #606382 I have to obtain a new orig tarball. python-peak.util is a multi-upstream source package but obtain a new orig tarball in not a difficult tas

Re: RFS: haskell-qt

2011-05-25 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi Filip, Am Dienstag, den 24.05.2011, 22:31 +0200 schrieb Filip Brcic: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "haskell-qt". we prefer to treat all haskell packages equally, e.g. having their debian directory in the Darcs repo unter the pkg-haskell alioth project. Have you considered joining

Re: Avoiding useless library dependencies

2011-05-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Paul Wise writes: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Paul Wise wrote: >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> >>> What's the proper way to fix this warning? >> >> Get this bug fixed: > > An addendum, fuse looks like it needs a new maintainer: > > http://bugs.debian.org624818