Re: RFS: pmatch

2011-07-04 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Tomasz, On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 17:58 +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pmatch. * Package name: pmatch Version : 0.4.0-1 Upstream Author : Tomasz Muras * URL : http://pmatch.rubyforge.org/ * License :

Re: RFS: trophy (Adopted and updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Andreas, On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 20:09 +0200, Andreas Moog wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7-1 of my package trophy. It builds these binary packages: trophy - 2D car racing action game trophy-data - 2D car racing action game (data files)

Re: RFS: pmatch

2011-07-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/07/11 at 08:31 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: Hi Tomasz, On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 17:58 +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pmatch. * Package name: pmatch Version : 0.4.0-1 Upstream Author : Tomasz Muras * URL

Re: RFS: xul-ext-zotero

2011-07-04 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Theodore, On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 00:45 +0300, Theodore Lytras wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package xul-ext-zotero, an extension for Iceweasel. * Package name: xul-ext-zotero Version : 2.1.8-1 Upstream Author : Center for History and New

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Thomas, Thomas Goirand wrote: Considering that nobody replied to you in 4 days, I reviewed the package, and uploaded. Thank you very much, I appreciate it. It FTBFSed on kfreebsd-* unfortunately, so I'll work on fixing that and will have a new version ready soon... Stay tuned :) Cheers,

Re: RFS: xul-ext-zotero

2011-07-04 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:16:20AM +0200, Kilian Krause a écrit : CDBS is no longer preferred. Hi Kilian, I think that it is quite a bold statement. At least, there is not formal archive-wide of deprecation of CDBS. Personally, I find that CDBS can be much easier to use than dh for setting

Re: RFS: qasmixer

2011-07-04 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Sebastian, Sebastian H. wrote: Ok, I've read through a few of the doc pages, fixed some (most?) of the issues and prepared a new package. lintian from squeeze now doesn't report any problems anymore. Except for the too new standards 3.9.2 but that's because lintian is too old. Looks

Re: RFS: xul-ext-zotero

2011-07-04 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Charles, On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 17:12 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:16:20AM +0200, Kilian Krause a écrit : CDBS is no longer preferred. Hi Kilian, I think that it is quite a bold statement. At least, there is not formal archive-wide of deprecation of

Re: RFS: pysvn (updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Henry, On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 21:13 -0500, Henry velez wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7.5-1 of my package pysvn. It builds these binary packages: python-svn - A(nother) Python interface to Subversion python-svn-dbg - A(nother) Python interface to

Re: pdebuild --debbuildopts -sa does not accept orig.tar.bz2 format?

2011-07-04 Thread Lukas Anzinger
Hi mira, I stumbled upon the same problem when I wanted to rebuild a package which also ships the original source as a .tar.bz2 file. On Debian Lenny using pbuilder 0.181 --debuildopts -sa did the trick for me, however. Regards, Lukas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RFS: qasmixer

2011-07-04 Thread Kilian Krause
Benoît, On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 10:14 +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: Looks good. Just use a versioned URL [1] for the Format field in debian/copyright. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?view=markuppathrev=174 just for me to understand. DEP-5 is frozen. Why exactly is

Re: RFS: kamerka

2011-07-04 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Sebastian, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote: 2011/7/1 Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org: [...]  - Your short and long descriptions are too technical; have a look at    [1] for the best practices.    [1]

Re: RFS: qasmixer

2011-07-04 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Kilian, Kilian Krause wrote: Benoît, On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 10:14 +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: Looks good. Just use a versioned URL [1] for the Format field in debian/copyright. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?view=markuppathrev=174 just for me to

Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

2011-07-04 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Peter, Peter Bennett wrote: Thank you for taking the time to review this. I will take care of these and get a new package uploaded. You're welcome. Thanks for your work on this package. Regarding openoffice.org - the envelope command creates an openoffice or libreoffice write document.

Re: RFS: trophy (Adopted and updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote: 1. Using dh-autoreconf is ugly. Please try to avoid it and backport the full regenerated configure in your patch to make sure the source is identical on all buildds. IMHO dh-autoreconf is a solution for a local build that

Re: RFS: qasmixer

2011-07-04 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:25:26AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: Hi, just for me to understand. DEP-5 is frozen. Why exactly is the version needed now that it isn't altered anymore? It doesn't really matter because it has to be changed for the final location anyway.

Re: RFS: trophy (Adopted and updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:49:59AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: 1. Using dh-autoreconf is ugly. Please try to avoid it and backport the full regenerated configure in your patch to make sure the source is identical on all buildds. IMHO dh-autoreconf is a solution for a local build that you

Re: RFS: trophy (Adopted and updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Gergely Nagy
Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org writes: 1. Using dh-autoreconf is ugly. Please try to avoid it and backport the full regenerated configure in your patch to make sure the source is identical on all buildds. IMHO dh-autoreconf is a solution for a local build that you maintain for yourself

Re: RFS: trophy (Adopted and updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Paul, On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 09:59 +0100, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote: 1. Using dh-autoreconf is ugly. Please try to avoid it and backport the full regenerated configure in your patch to make sure the source is identical on all

Re: RFS: trophy (Adopted and updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Adam, On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 11:11 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:49:59AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: 1. Using dh-autoreconf is ugly. Please try to avoid it and backport the full regenerated configure in your patch to make sure the source is identical on all

Re: RFS: trophy (Adopted and updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Kilian Krause wrote: I do remember these funny situations where you autoconf with another version and/or another setup than upstream and configure was generated but broken. Thus all I was saying is that configure shouldn't be among those files dynamically

Re: RFS: trophy (Adopted and updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Kilian Krause
Gergely, On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 12:10 +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote: Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org writes: 1. Using dh-autoreconf is ugly. Please try to avoid it and backport the full regenerated configure in your patch to make sure the source is identical on all buildds. IMHO dh-autoreconf

Re: RFS: trophy (Adopted and updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote: That exactly was my idea too. To ship a source that is known and can be predicted regarding changes. If a security upload would be required but autoconf generates a broken configure due to some circumstances that couldn't

Re: RFS: trophy (Adopted and updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Kilian Krause
Paul, On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 11:33 +0100, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Kilian Krause wrote: I do remember these funny situations where you autoconf with another version and/or another setup than upstream and configure was generated but broken. Thus all I was saying is

Re: RFS: trophy (Adopted and updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Kilian Krause
Paul, On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 11:36 +0100, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote: That exactly was my idea too. To ship a source that is known and can be predicted regarding changes. If a security upload would be required but autoconf

Re: RFS: qasmixer

2011-07-04 Thread Sebastian H.
Am 04.07.2011 10:14, schrieb Benoît Knecht: Hi Sebastian, Sebastian H. wrote: Ok, I've read through a few of the doc pages, fixed some (most?) of the issues and prepared a new package. lintian from squeeze now doesn't report any problems anymore. Except for the too new standards 3.9.2 but

Re: RFS: qasmixer

2011-07-04 Thread Benoît Knecht
Sebastian H. wrote: Am 04.07.2011 10:14, schrieb Benoît Knecht: Sebastian H. wrote: I've tried the bugreport utility from squeeze to report an ITP but it seems to have crashed before sending. I can try it again with the sid version tomorrow. You can also report the bug via email [2]

Re: RFS: qasmixer

2011-07-04 Thread Sebastian H.
I've tried the bugreport utility from squeeze to report an ITP but it seems to have crashed before sending. I can try it again with the sid version tomorrow. You can also report the bug via email [2] if really reportbug doesn't work for you. After switching the reportbug interface from the

Re: RFS: wmmixer

2011-07-04 Thread Rodolfo kix Garcia
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 13:48:13 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: Hi, Name: wmmixer Maintainer: Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) (k...@kix.es) (Debian QA page) Version:1.5-12 Uploaded: 2011-04-05 15:38:10 Description:wmmixer - mixer application designed for WindowMaker Repository

Re: RFS: wmmixer

2011-07-04 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi again, [...] - Why have urgency=low QA (group) upload in the first line when you are doing a proper upload? Lintian detects the package as orphan and then shows the warning. If I try to write QA (group) upload in the first line (alone), lintian shows other warning. I don't know how to

Re: RFS: xul-ext-zotero

2011-07-04 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Le lundi 4 juillet 2011 10:12:49, Charles Plessy a écrit : Le Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:16:20AM +0200, Kilian Krause a écrit : CDBS is no longer preferred. Hi Kilian, Hi Charles I think that it is quite a bold statement. At least, there is not formal archive-wide of deprecation of CDBS.

Re: RFS: qasmixer

2011-07-04 Thread Benoît Knecht
Sebastian H. wrote: I've tried the bugreport utility from squeeze to report an ITP but it seems to have crashed before sending. I can try it again with the sid version tomorrow. You can also report the bug via email [2] if really reportbug doesn't work for you. After switching the

Re: RFS: qasmixer

2011-07-04 Thread Sebastian H.
After switching the reportbug interface from the gtk to curses it worked. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632642 But you forgot to add a '(Closes: #632642)' instruction in your debian/changelog... Sorry, I'm not too familiar with this bug tracking thing. How does this

Re: RFS: trophy (Adopted and updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Andreas Moog
On 07/04/2011 08:49 AM, Kilian Krause wrote: Hi Andreas, Hi Kilian, thanks for the review. 1. Using dh-autoreconf is ugly. Please try to avoid it and backport the full regenerated configure in your patch to make sure the source is identical on all buildds. IMHO dh-autoreconf is a solution

RFS: taxbird (updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Olaf Dietsche
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.16-0.1 of the package taxbird. It builds these binary packages: taxbird- The first free Elster client (German Tax Declarations) The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL:

RFS: libgeier (updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Olaf Dietsche
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12-0.1 of my package libgeier. It builds these binary packages: libgeier-dev - Development files for the libgeier library libgeier0 - Elster client library (German tax declarations) The package appears to be lintian clean. The

Re: RFS: xul-ext-zotero

2011-07-04 Thread Θοδωρής Λύτρας
Στις Δευ 04 Ιουλ 2011, ο/η Kilian Krause έγραψε: Hi Theodore, Hi Kilian, On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 00:45 +0300, Theodore Lytras wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package xul-ext-zotero, an extension for Iceweasel. * Package name: xul-ext-zotero Version

Re: RFS: xul-ext-zotero

2011-07-04 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Theodore, On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:53:18PM +0300, Θοδωρής Λύτρας wrote: Στις Δευ 04 Ιουλ 2011, ο/η Kilian Krause έγραψε: On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 00:45 +0300, Theodore Lytras wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package xul-ext-zotero, an extension for

RFS: john (updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Ruben Molina
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7.8-1 of my package john. It builds these binary packages: john - active password cracking tool john-data - active password cracking tool - character sets The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these

Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

2011-07-04 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, On 24.05.2011 02:29, Peter Bennett wrote: This is my second attempt. I have fixed errors that were pointed out to me last time. glad to see you fixed most of the problems I addressed last time. Thank you very much. This time I have some

Re: RFS: xul-ext-zotero

2011-07-04 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:30:29PM +0200, Kilian Krause a écrit : On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:53:18PM +0300, Θοδωρής Λύτρας wrote: I wanted to do this in DEP-5, but I did not see Affero GPLv3 in the list of license keywords in http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#index6h1 . Should I just use

Re: RFS: Sponsor needed for pmwiki

2011-07-04 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Robert, On 04.07.2011 03:17, Strobl, Robert wrote: I need a sponsor for: Package name: pmwiki License:GPL ^^^- its GPL-2 btw. Version:

Re: RFS: arp-scan (updated package, new maintainer)

2011-07-04 Thread William Vera
Hi! On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote: William, On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 09:01 -0500, William Vera wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote: William, On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 03:05 -0500, William Vera wrote: I guess

Re: RFS: pysvn (updated package)

2011-07-04 Thread Henry velez
Hi Kilian. Thank you for answering. I will do the respective changes and then I will let you know. Regards. 2011/7/4 Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org Hi Henry, On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 21:13 -0500, Henry velez wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7.5-1