Re: RFS: smarty

2011-08-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, thanks for your interest in smarty. On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Wojciech Szaranski wrote: > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 514305 Have you read http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514305#10 ? Because: 1/ you have not taken care of the ca

Re: RFS: l2tp-ipsec-vpn

2011-08-02 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Werner, On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 07:20:27AM +0200, Werner Jaeger wrote: > thank you so much for this review. > > I addressed and solved all the issues and uploaded the changes to > mentors.debian.net. > > BTW I'm still looking for a sponsor to upload this package. > > http://mentors.debian.net

Re: Adding symbols files to the tango package.

2011-08-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Indeed symbol ordering may vary, but also there is no reason for > dpkg-gensymbols > to guarantee a particular ordering. Well, dpkg-gensymbols does sort the symbols files. Precisely so that diff are meaningful. Otherwise they would be useless. Cod

Re: RFS: eviacam

2011-08-02 Thread Cesar Mauri
Hi Kilian, Thanks for your comments. I have (hopefully) addressed all the issues you pointed out. I have uploaded an updated version to the mentors site which appears to be lintian clean and pbuilds fine for sid. See below for additional details. I see however some LGPL undocumented in debi

Re: how to get people to run lintian on their packages

2011-08-02 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, On 02.08.2011 23:34, Paul Wise wrote: > Which version of lintian does it use? It would be nice if it were > pinned to sid or backports. I guess it doesn't process the binary > packages? Currently it uses 2.5.1 from Sid. Asheesh installed tha

Re: how to get people to run lintian on their packages

2011-08-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > A quick, much-delayed follow-up to this thread: expo.debian.net shows > lintian output on the web now. Which version of lintian does it use? It would be nice if it were pinned to sid or backports. I guess it doesn't process the binary packag

RFS: haproxy (updated package)

2011-08-02 Thread Christo Buschek
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.15-1 of my package "haproxy". It builds these binary packages: haproxy- fast and reliable load balancing reverse proxy The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 631351 The package can be found

RFS: parcellite 1.0.2~rc2-1 (updated package)

2011-08-02 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
Hi Mentors, My sponsor is a swamped with other matters, so I turn to you to hopefully review/ sponsor my package. I've uploaded it to mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/parcellite - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main cont

Re: RFS: rrep (updated package)

2011-08-02 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Arno, On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 05:45:46PM +0200, Arno Onken wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3-2 > of my package "rrep". > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rrep/rrep_1.3.3-2.dsc built, signed, uploaded. Thanks! -- Best regards, Kilian signature

RFS: rrep (updated package)

2011-08-02 Thread Arno Onken
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3-2 of my package "rrep". It builds these binary packages: rrep - recursive pattern replacement utility The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.ne

Re: RFS: rrep

2011-08-02 Thread Arno Onken
Hi Kilian, Thank you very much for sponsoring the rrep package and for you comments! That was really quick. I will prepare an update for the package which will address all of your concerns. On 08/01/2011 11:29 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: > Regarding your rationale that sed doesn't have a matching al

Re: how to get people to run lintian on their packages

2011-08-02 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Paul Wise wrote: It is rare to see an RFS that says "The package appears to be lintian clean." and the package (especially binary ones) actually be lintian clean. If we were to change the RFS template, what could we change it to in order to encourage accuracy and for people

RFS: qasmixer (backport package)

2011-08-02 Thread Sebastian H.
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the backport version 0.12.2-1~bpo60+1 of my package "qasmixer". It builds these binary packages: qasmixer - ALSA sound mixer with a size adaptive QT4 GUI The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL

Re: looking for sponsor for my package "jscribble"

2011-08-02 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-08-02 03:42, Martin Ueding wrote: > Dear Niels, > Hi, > >> I have reviewed your package and there some issues with it. It may >> appear as if I am tearing your package completely apart, but it is >> intended as constructive criticism to improve your package. > > Thank you very much for

Re: RFS: wizznic

2011-08-02 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Adam Borowski writes: > Right, I missed the .o and .dll files, counting only wizznic-x86-precompiled > and tools/releaser/data/win/curl/curl.exe (the ones mentioned by lintian). > > The dlls are libjpeg, zlib, libogg, SDL, openssl -- all DFSG free with > source already in main. The source would n