Re: RFS: aescrypt

2011-08-03 Thread mezgani ali
Please find here the new version of the package: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aescrypt". * Package name: aescrypt Version : 3.05-1 Upstream Author :Glenn Washburn Paul E. Jones Mauro Gilardi * URL

Re: RFS: mpd-sima (updated package)

2011-08-03 Thread Geoffroy Youri Berret
Hi Kilian, Le 03/08/2011 22:44, Kilian Krause a écrit : > > [...] >> I've uploaded a new version, tagged 0.8.0-1, to mentors. >> I haven't pushed to the git repo yet. >> >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpd-sima/mpd-sima_0.8.0-1.dsc > > Very good. Built, Signed, Uploaded. > > Ple

Re: Adding symbols files to the tango package.

2011-08-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > What do your mean exactly by sorted ? > > sorted using the 'sort' program ? > sorted like the un-mangled symbols ? IIRC it's sorted alphabetically on the string that appears in the symbols file (i.e. un-mangeld symbol in your case). The tags

Re: RFS: autotrace (updated package)

2011-08-03 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Edgar, On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 05:23:04AM -0500, Edgar Antonio Palma de la Cruz wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.31.1-16 > of my package "autotrace". > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/autotrace/autotrace_0.31.1-16.dsc Thanks for your work. Clean

RFS: ndpmon

2011-08-03 Thread John R. Baskwill
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ndpmon", * Package name : ndpmon Version : 1.4.0-1 Upstream Author : frederic.b...@loria.fr * URL : http://ndpmon.sourceforge.net/index.html * License : LGPL 2.1+ Section

Re: RFS: wizznic

2011-08-03 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Edgar, On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:53:44AM -0500, Edgar Antonio Palma de la Cruz wrote: > El Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:21:23 +0200 > Ansgar Burchardt escribió: > > Adam Borowski writes: > > > Right, I missed the .o and .dll files, counting only > > > wizznic-x86-precompiled and tools/releaser/data/w

Re: RFS: mpd-sima (updated package)

2011-08-03 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Geoff, On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:47:47PM +0200, Geoffroy Youri Berret wrote: > Thanks for your review :) > > Le 03/08/2011 18:29, Kilian Krause a écrit : > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:42:15PM +0200, Geoffroy Youri Berret wrote: > >> I gentle ping on this package :) > >> > >> I moved the pack

Re: acsccid (Updated)

2011-08-03 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Godfrey, On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:53:45AM +0800, Godfrey Chung wrote: > I just updated debian/copyright. Please have a look. Thanks! Thanks for your work. Having a first look myself at your package I find: 1. You build-depend on autotools-dev but don't use it in debian/rules' dh call. P

Re: RFS: eviacam

2011-08-03 Thread Cesar Mauri
Hi Kilian, [...] - Have your binary chmod 4750 - with uid 0 (thus the setUID) and - group "whateveryournewgroupname" In debian/postinst that would look like: chmod 4750 $BINARY chown 0:$GID $BINARY where $GID is the group id of the group you create in postinst. That will make sure it gets the

Re: RFS: mpd-sima (updated package)

2011-08-03 Thread Geoffroy Youri Berret
Hi Kilian, Thanks for your review :) Le 03/08/2011 18:29, Kilian Krause a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:42:15PM +0200, Geoffroy Youri Berret wrote: >> I gentle ping on this package :) >> >> I moved the packaged to "Debian Multimedia Maintainers". >> git://git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia

Re: Adding symbols files to the tango package.

2011-08-03 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Le Wed, 3 Aug 2011 08:26:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > Indeed symbol ordering may vary, but also there is no reason for > > dpkg-gensymbols > > to guarantee a particular ordering. > > Well, dpkg-gensymbols does sort the symbols files. P

Re: RFS: aescrypt

2011-08-03 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:16:23PM +, mezgani ali wrote: > * License : gpl3 No, it's GPL2+ for aes.c and sha256.c and non-free "freeware" license (not explicitly allowing modification) for other files. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: mpd-sima (updated package)

2011-08-03 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Geoff, On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:42:15PM +0200, Geoffroy Youri Berret wrote: > I gentle ping on this package :) > > I moved the packaged to "Debian Multimedia Maintainers". > git://git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia/mpd-sima.git > > I believe the package to be in pretty good shape now. Tha

RFS: aescrypt

2011-08-03 Thread mezgani ali
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aescrypt". * Package name: aescrypt Version : 3.05-1 Upstream Author :Glenn Washburn Paul E. Jones Mauro Gilardi * URL : http://www.aescrypt.com/ * License : gpl3

Re: RFS: l2tp-ipsec-vpn

2011-08-03 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Werner, On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 16:19 +0200, Werner Jaeger wrote: > you should be able to find l2tp-ipsec-vpn-daemon package at > > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages?action=details;package=l2tp-ipsec-vpn-daemon > > Repository URL is > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/poo

Re: RFS: l2tp-ipsec-vpn

2011-08-03 Thread Werner Jaeger
Hi Kilian, you should be able to find l2tp-ipsec-vpn-daemon package at http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages?action=details;package=l2tp-ipsec-vpn-daemon Repository URL is http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/l2tp-ipsec-vpn-daemon So far, this package has got now revie

Re: looking for sponsor for my package "jscribble"

2011-08-03 Thread Martin Ueding
Dear Niels, > I am not too sure on the `...` quoting-style. I think "..." is better, > but I could be wrong, so I am hoping to get a second opinion from the > list. :) I suppose it is related to the use of 10" as ""10 inch""? The `...` style is Markdown's way to get monospace, but I assume tha

Re: RFS: eviacam

2011-08-03 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Cesar, On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 13:22 +0200, Cesar Mauri wrote: > > [...] > >>> or so and move the SUID bit setting including creating a > >>> group to postinst so that you limit the impact to an acceptable minimum. > >>> Having an open root access for everybody on a system is quite a bit > >>> to

Re: RFS: eviacam

2011-08-03 Thread Cesar Mauri
Hi Kilian, [...] or so and move the SUID bit setting including creating a group to postinst so that you limit the impact to an acceptable minimum. Having an open root access for everybody on a system is quite a bit too generous IMHO. I don't like also having a SUID binary but it is the only w

Re: RFS: wizznic

2011-08-03 Thread Edgar Antonio Palma de la Cruz
El Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:21:23 +0200 Ansgar Burchardt escribió: > Adam Borowski writes: > > Right, I missed the .o and .dll files, counting only > > wizznic-x86-precompiled and tools/releaser/data/win/curl/curl.exe > > (the ones mentioned by lintian). > > > > The dlls are libjpeg, zlib, libogg, SDL

Re: RFS: smarty

2011-08-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 03 Aug 2011, Thierry Randrianiriana wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Wojciech Szaranski wrote: > > * Package name    : smarty > >  Version         : 3.0.8-5 > > There is a smarty3 package with the same version > http://packages.debian.org/sid/smarty3 . And you are the mainta

Re: Doubt about library version

2011-08-03 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-08-03 11:28, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi, > > [...] >> the wmaker package includes some libraries in the upstream source. >> One of this libraries includes some files (WMaker.h and libMaker.*). >> This files are not in the source tree now (were removed from the git >> because they are n

Re: Doubt about library version

2011-08-03 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, [...] > the wmaker package includes some libraries in the upstream source. > One of this libraries includes some files (WMaker.h and libMaker.*). > This files are not in the source tree now (were removed from the git > because they are not longer needed). Therefore, the package > libwmaker0-de

Re: Doubt about library version

2011-08-03 Thread Rodolfo kix Garcia
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:27:30 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: Hi, if one application has two packages in debian (Z and libZ), but in the new upstream release, the library does not exists, what's happend with the package "libZ" in debian? we need to "close" the library package? What do you mea

Re: RFS: smarty

2011-08-03 Thread Thierry Randrianiriana
hi, On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Wojciech Szaranski wrote: > * Package name    : smarty >  Version         : 3.0.8-5 There is a smarty3 package with the same version http://packages.debian.org/sid/smarty3 . Best Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org w

Re: Doubt about library version

2011-08-03 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, > if one application has two packages in debian (Z and libZ), but in > the new upstream release, the library does not exists, what's > happend with the package "libZ" in debian? we need to "close" the > library package? > What do you mean by "close" here!? Furthermore, are you asking this qu

Re: RFS: eviacam

2011-08-03 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Cesar, On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 05:23:43AM +0200, Cesar Mauri wrote: > Thanks for your comments. I have (hopefully) addressed all the > issues you pointed out. I have uploaded an updated version to the > mentors site which appears to be lintian clean and pbuilds fine for > sid. See below for add

Re: RFS: nullidentd (adopting package)

2011-08-03 Thread Jeroen Schot
Hello Michael, On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:00:58AM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Thanks a lot for stepping up as new maintainer of this package. > I've briefly reviewed your changes over the previous package and it > all looks good. Built and uploaded. > > For a future upload, however, it wou

Re: RFS: smarty

2011-08-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Because: > 1/ you have not taken care of the case where other packages install >files in /usr/share/php/smarty/libs/plugins (i.e. no preinst, no >conflicts, nothing for this) Just to clarify, you should add versioned conflicts on all those pack