Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package icecat.
* Package name: icecat
Version : 5.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Giuseppe Scrivano gscriv...@gnu.org
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/
* License : MPL/GPL/LPPL
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 00:58, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com writes:
Sidenote: I am not sure why the usage of 'disappearing packages' was
removed from the wiki as dpkg and APT support them in squeeze - at least
in my eyes it looked like the holy
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Javier Sancho j...@jsancho.org wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package icecat.
* Package name : icecat
Version : 5.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Giuseppe Scrivano gscriv...@gnu.org
* URL :
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:44:18PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi Stas,
The package is again available on mentors.debian.net website.
Could someone please review and upload it if everything is ok?
I've built, signed, and uploaded your package as-is. Yet the following issues
On 08/19/2011 01:31 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
I'm wondering whether it would make sense to remove other cruft as well -
basically contrib/ entirely and workspaces could go as well. And, well, I
think
might be a good idea, thanks.
when i did it, i mainly removed the MUST
Hi again,
On 08/19/2011 01:31 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
I'm wondering whether it would make sense to remove other cruft as well -
basically contrib/ entirely and workspaces could go as well. And, well, I
think
might be a good idea, thanks.
when i did it, i mainly removed the
Hi!
Am 19.08.2011 11:01, schrieb IOhannes zmölnig:
+dfsg would be preferable over ~dfsg, but you might have good reasons for
your
choice?
im using that because in the pkg-multimedia team (where i partake), we
use ~.
doing a quick stats on my system, i have
32 $(VER)+dfsg
28
On 08/19/2011 03:22 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org, 2011-08-19, 00:31:
some missing copyright information
DEP-5-enabled lintian (see bug #633779) also reports several issues:
W: assimp source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright paragraph 20 copyright
W: assimp
* IOhannes zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at, 2011-08-19, 11:01:
doing a quick stats on my system, i have
32 $(VER)+dfsg
28 $(VER)~dfsg
28 $(VER).dfsg
5 $(VER)dfsg
4 $(VER)-dfsg
FWIF, do not ever use .dfsg. See the dfsg-version-with-period lintian
warning for rationale. I'd also avoid -dfsg, because
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:51:11 +0100
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:41:33 +0200
David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com wrote:
[Snip]
I'd rather keep the name roxterm for the GTK3 version if that's OK.
I don't really want the main package to be named after a
* IOhannes zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at, 2011-08-19, 11:30:
pyassimp.errors.AssimpError: assimp library not found
hmm, it worked for me...:-(
trying to find words to ask you how and what, i think i found the
reason: pyassimp looks for /usr/lib/libassimp.so which is only provided
by libassimp-dev
On 08/19/2011 03:34 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* IOhannes zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at, 2011-08-19, 11:30:
pyassimp.errors.AssimpError: assimp library not found
hmm, it worked for me...:-(
trying to find words to ask you how and what, i think i found the
reason: pyassimp looks for
* IOhannes zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at, 2011-08-19, 15:45:
pyassimp.errors.AssimpError: assimp library not found
hmm, it worked for me...:-(
trying to find words to ask you how and what, i think i found the
reason: pyassimp looks for /usr/lib/libassimp.so which is only
provided by libassimp-dev
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package spotweb.
* Package name: spotweb
Version : 0~20110818+git9fcd44c4-1~pre1
Upstream Author : Spotweb spot...@github.com
URL : http://github.com/spotweb/spotweb
* License : BSD-3-clause, some parts
On 08/19/2011 04:32 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
to resolve libassimp.so.2 dynamically.
But why? The Python code has hardcoded assumptions about the library
ABI, so you should open libassimp.so.2, not any other libassimp.so.N
(which ABI might be different).
thanks, sounds like a good idea.
Dear mentors, sponsors and fellow Debianistas,
here is my second attempt to find a sponsor (or more reviewers) for my
package assimp.
since the main package description has not really changed much since
yesterday, i will give you just a quick overview about what has changed.
(full description
* IOhannes zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at, 2011-08-19, 20:03:
here is my second attempt to find a sponsor (or more reviewers) for my
package assimp.
Was debian/TODO supposed to be included in the source package? :)
libassimp2.symbols:
has now demangled symbols for the C++, and normal symbols for C
Hello,
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:04:44 +0200
Javier Sancho j...@jsancho.org wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package icecat.
i) What's the point of it, how is it different from Iceweasel?
ii) Why doesn't your package use pre-existing XULRunner in Debian?
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 14:50 +0200, Arno Töll a écrit :
Hi Rodolphe,
On 18.08.2011 14:11, Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
So the new upload is not a NMU anymore and it could be my first official
package :)
Here are a few comments about your package:
* Please consider using a more
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package dylandotnet.
* Package name: dylandotnet
Version : 11.2.7.4-2
Upstream Author : Dylan Borg borgdy...@hotmail.com
* URL : https://launchpad.net/dylandotnet
* License : GPL-3+
Section :
David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 00:58, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
You can't use disappearing packages with Policy-compliant packages so
far as I can tell, since it would require both packages provide the
same /usr/share/doc directory and
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin
manutm...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package news.
* Package name : news
Version : 0.5.3-1
Upstream Author : Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin manutm...@gmail.com
* URL :
22 matches
Mail list logo
