On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jakub Wilk , 2011-08-28, 17:33:
>>>
Thanks a lot for the extremely useful and thorough review. Will revert
back with the required changes soon.
Will talk to upstream author about
>debian/copyright:
>replace __YEAR__ with the actual year and
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 01:03:55AM -0400, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
> The upload would fix these bugs: 622722
> [1] - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/aqemu
> - dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aqemu/aqemu_0.8.2-1.dsc
How is progress on bug 617877 ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.2-1 of my package "aqemu".
It builds these binary packages:
aqemu - Qt4 front-end for QEMU and KVM
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 622722
Here is the relevant changelog section:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 02:34:03 +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/alternative
> Uploaded.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/open-axiom
>
> Sorry for flooding ;-)
>
Some of these things I should have found earlier, but I thought lintian
would keep you busy longer ;).
- The se
On 8/28/11, Igor Pashev wrote:
> 28.08.2011 19:00, David Bremner пишет:
Without having looked at all at your package (and, note, I am purely a
random bystander, not a mentor or packager or anything):
>> I'm not sure if open-axiom uses this feature (and I notice sbcl itself
>> also has broken #!
Tony Houghton writes:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 22:50:46 +0800
> Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
>
>> Only one problem when I tested the package. The gtk3 version, the
>> terminal window shrinks its width when I try to move it around. I don't
>> know if it's because of my window manager (awesome) or it also appe
On 28/08/2011 1:04 PM, Ryan Tandy wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.4-1
of my package "micro-evtd".
The package has found a sponsor and been uploaded. Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:05:55PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> Sure -- I could remove it. I'd rather, though, say we should fix the PTS
> to only show versions of packages greater than the ones in Debian.
>
> Can you file that bug against the PTS? I don't removing it from m.d.n
> once you have
Uploaded.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/open-axiom
Sorry for flooding ;-)
2011/8/29 David Bremner
>
> Just upload another source package to mentors.debian.net, and I'll
> review and hopefully upload it. Or find something else to complain
> about :).
>
> David
>
* Asheesh Laroia , 2011-08-28, 18:05:
Someone, somewhen uploaded a dpatch 2.0.31-1[1] package to
mentors.d.n, before it became debexpo. That version is well.. lets
just say, obsolete. However, it still shows up on the dpatch PTS
page[2], which is kind of annoying. I've tried emailing the upload
Excerpts from Gergely Nagy's message of Sun Aug 28 16:13:55 -0400 2011:
> Hi!
>
> The Q&A on mentors.d.n wasn't quite clear on whom I shall contact in
> cases like this, but figured there's no harm asking on -mentors@ either:
Hi there! If it's a support question, which this mostly is, then I sugg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gregely,
On 28.08.2011 22:13, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Someone, somewhen uploaded a dpatch 2.0.31-1[1] package to mentors.d.n,
> before it became debexpo. That version is well.. lets just say,
> obsolete.
in hope nobody will miss the package on Mento
Hi Bart,
Thanks for your reply.
2011/8/28 Bart Martens
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 09:11:58PM +0200, Sergio Oller wrote:
> >
> > http://mentors.debian.net/package/festival-ca
>
> I can't find this information in debian/copyright:
> $ head -n5 languages.scm
>
> ;;
Dear mentors and ARM porters,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.4-1
of my package "micro-evtd".
It builds these binary packages:
micro-evtd - Linkstation Pro/Kurobox Pro special features support
micro-evtd-udeb - Linkstation Pro/Kurobox Pro special features support -
udeb (udeb)
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 09:11:58PM +0200, Sergio Oller wrote:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/festival-ca
I can't find this information in debian/copyright:
$ head -n5 languages.scm
;;;
Hi!
The Q&A on mentors.d.n wasn't quite clear on whom I shall contact in
cases like this, but figured there's no harm asking on -mentors@ either:
Someone, somewhen uploaded a dpatch 2.0.31-1[1] package to mentors.d.n,
before it became debexpo. That version is well.. lets just say,
obsolete. Howev
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:11:25 +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/alternative
> Lintian clear.
>
> 1. Hypetex data is moved to /usr/share with symlink.
> 2. Removed shebangs and "compiled from ..." lines from *.fasl files
>
> Now OA packages are lintian clear.
Just upload another
Lintian clear.
1. Hypetex data is moved to /usr/share with symlink.
2. Removed shebangs and "compiled from ..." lines from *.fasl files
Now OA packages are lintian clear.
Can we ship it?
Should I make one more source package
or compile binary (I have only amd64)?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "festival-ca".
* Package name: festival-ca
Version : 1.0.2-1
Upstream Author : Sergio Oller
* URL : http://www.talp.cat/festcat/
* License : LGPL-2.1
* Jakub Wilk , 2011-08-28, 17:33:
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/conque
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/conque/c
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 04:16:02PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 22:50:46 +0800
> Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
>
> > Only one problem when I tested the package. The gtk3 version, the
> > terminal window shrinks its width when I try to move it around. I don't
> > know if it's because of
28.08.2011 19:00, David Bremner пишет:
> I'm not sure if open-axiom uses this feature (and I notice sbcl itself
> also has broken #! lines in it's fasl files. In your case, I suspect the
> upstream build process is putting the wrong path into the #!
> lines. interpsys isn't installed by debian sbcl
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xxxterm".
* Package name: xxxterm
Version : 1.517-1
Upstream Author : Several (Marco Peereboom )
* URL : http://opensource.conformal.com/wiki/XXXTerm
* License : ISC, MIT, BSD-4-clause, BSD-3-clause,
* harish badrinath , 2011-08-25, 21:41:
vim-conqueterm - This Vim-Plugin is used to run interactive commands
inside a Vim.
I have followed Debian packaging policy for vim plug ins, to the best
of my knowledge. I have checked the deb file with lintian using the
command "lintian -IiE --pedantic"
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 22:50:46 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Only one problem when I tested the package. The gtk3 version, the
> terminal window shrinks its width when I try to move it around. I don't
> know if it's because of my window manager (awesome) or it also appears
> on other environment. If y
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 23:01:12 +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> I have fixed all lintian issues, except two:
> 1. image-file-in-usr-lib (e. g.
> usr/lib/open-axiom/share/hypertex/bitmaps/anna_logo.xbm)
Hmm. This should be fixed eventually, but if it will be fixed upstream
anyway, it is probably more s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sunday 28 August 2011 09:32 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
>> On 27/08/11 at 03:08 +0530, Muneeb Shaikh wrote:
>>> Dear mentors,
>>>
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-omniauth".
>>>
>>> * Package
Hi Paul,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 02:15:02PM +0100, Paul Wise wrote:
> Given the attitudes displayed by upstream wrt your patches I'm
> unlikely to use this software, let alone sponsor it so my opinion is
> irrelevant here.
I guess I may have provided a wrong idea here. I also have my own opinion
On Saturday 27 August 2011 01:13 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 27/08/11 at 03:08 +0530, Muneeb Shaikh wrote: Hi,
>
> The gem has dependencies on oa-basic (= 0.2.6), oa-enterprise (=
> 0.2.6), oa-core (= 0.2.6), oa-more (= 0.2.6), oa-oauth (= 0.2.6),
> oa-openid (= 0.2.6). Are you sure that the
On 28/08/11 at 10:27 +0530, karim memon wrote:
> >
> > So please don't upload. Ruby is API mess even without multiple rails
> > versions.
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I haven't looked at the package, but I know that Ondřej Surý has been
> > > doing some work on rails-related packages, so maybe he woul
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Sorry, but I don't think that's an option upstream will take. For
> example, the default homepage of the upstream version is a website of a
> company. One of the patches changes this to a blank page and has been
> discarded by upstream.
..
Hi Paul,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:31:40AM +0100, Paul Wise wrote:
> Here is a review of your package:
Thank you lot for your time!
> I would personally wrap the build-deps one package per line, since it
> makes it easier to see what changed.
Ok, I'll do that.
> Your watch file is overly gene
Hi and thanks for your feedback.
On 08/24/2011 10:56 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2011-08-23 20:55, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Jan-Hendrik (hennr) Peters
>> wrote:
>>> But there is another lintian warning that bugs me and I could use some
>>> advices with thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "l2tp-ipsec-vpn-daemon".
* Package name: l2tp-ipsec-vpn-daemon
Version : 0.9.6-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "l2tp-ipsec-vpn".
* Package name: l2tp-ipsec-vpn
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web s
Here is a review of your package:
I would personally wrap the build-deps one package per line, since it
makes it easier to see what changed.
Your watch file is overly generic, I would suggest using this instead:
http://opensource.conformal.com/snapshots/xxxterm/xxxterm-([\d\.]+)\.tgz
There is a
On 08/28/11 06:57, karim memon wrote:
> So please don't upload. Ruby is API mess even without multiple rails
> versions.
> So do i need to stop working on this package? and what about the ITP,
> what should it be retitled to?
I don't know anything about Ruby or Rails (except that they exi
37 matches
Mail list logo
