Re: RFS: getstream

2011-09-04 Thread Hervé Rousseau
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 14:17, Christoph Egger wrote: > The orig.tar.gz downloaded from the website differs from the orig.tar.gz > in your package: > > 1144dc0180cedb494f6c7826e994fc3bcf7eebe4 > getstream_20100616.orig.tar.gz.website > 1e45acb2b75b6da9ecd446408f04dd2631c5f71f > getstream_20100616

Re: RFS: fizsh

2011-09-04 Thread Guido van Steen
Hi Michael. That is excellent news. Thank you very much! Guido On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi Guido, > >> I fixed the two remaining issues (added a patch for the man page, and >> used dput to upload the original version of fizsh_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz). >> > [...] >

Re: decibel-audio-player

2011-09-04 Thread Leonardo Marín
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:51:39PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > No, that's appropriate, since it is the Python Applications Team's own > forum. Thanks for clarifying what you meant. I don't see the message in the history list, and resend message, > You might want to find the exact message-id field

Re: decibel-audio-player

2011-09-04 Thread Ben Finney
Leonardo Marín writes: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 10:24:31AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > When you say “the list of python”, do you mean the ‘debian-python’ > > forum? When did you write to that forum? What was the message-id field > > of your message? > > I sent my message to "python-apps-t...@li

Re: decibel-audio-player

2011-09-04 Thread Leonardo Marín
Hi Ben, On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 10:24:31AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > When you say “the list of python”, do you mean the ‘debian-python’ > forum? When did you write to that forum? What was the message-id field > of your message? I sent my message to "python-apps-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org", wro

Re: decibel-audio-player

2011-09-04 Thread Ben Finney
Leonardo Marín writes: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:58:11PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > You might want to contact the Python Apps packaging team directly > > […] > I wrote to the list of python, but nobody has responded, When you say “the list of python”, do you mean the ‘debian-pytho

Re: RFS: open-axiom

2011-09-04 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:02:27 +0400, Igor Pashev wrote: > > Oh, and for next upload please add Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git headers > Is it ok to use github or whatsoever for this? I think this is not well codified within Debian at the moment, but I would say the corporate nature and non-free software

Re: decibel-audio-player

2011-09-04 Thread Leonardo Marín
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:58:11PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi, > > You might want to contact the Python Apps packaging team directly, but most > likely your project membership should immediately give you (write) access to > the > subversion repository. I suppose you have already read

Re: RFS: fizsh

2011-09-04 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Guido, > I fixed the two remaining issues (added a patch for the man page, and > used dput to upload the original version of fizsh_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz). > [...] Thanks a lot for this quick update. I've checked the changes, built the package, signed, and uploaded it. Thanks a lot for your work,

Re: decibel-audio-player

2011-09-04 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, [...] > I need assistance for configure svn (last config doesn't work), > i saw http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/Svn > but, i confused with this, > and how to update package in alioth :) > You might want to contact the Python Apps packaging team directly, but most likely your project membership

decibel-audio-player

2011-09-04 Thread Leonardo Marín
Hi all, Attempt to adopt the package decibel-audio-player, the current maintainer (it's busy), I need assistance for configure svn (last config doesn't work), i saw http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/Svn but, i confused with this, and how to update package in alioth :) My apologies, Leonardo. -- L.

decibel-audio-player

2011-09-04 Thread Leonardo Marín
Hi all, Attempt to adopt the package decibel-audio-player, the current maintainer (it's busy), I need assistance for configure svn (last config doesn't work), i saw http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/Svn but, i confused with this, and how to update package in alioth :) My apologies, Leonardo. -- L.

RFS: sxiv

2011-09-04 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sxiv". * Package name: sxiv Version : 0.9-1 Upstream Author : Bert Münnich * URL : https://github.com/muennich/sxiv * License : GPL-2.0+ Section : graphics It build

Re: RFS: fizsh

2011-09-04 Thread Guido van Steen
Hi Michael, I fixed the two remaining issues (added a patch for the man page, and used dput to upload the original version of fizsh_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz). The amended package and the original version have been uploaded as: * http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fizsh/fizsh_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz

Re: RFS: open-axiom

2011-09-04 Thread Igor Pashev
Thank you David! I was blind: build-arch <-> binary-arch :-) > Oh, and for next upload please add Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git headers Is it ok to use github or whatsoever for this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

RFS: manaplus

2011-09-04 Thread andrei karas
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "manaplus". * Package name: manaplus Version : 1.1.9.4-1 Upstream Author : Andrei Karas * URL : http://manaplus.evolonline.org/ * License : GPL v2 Section : games It builds those binary p

Re: RFS: fizsh

2011-09-04 Thread Guido van Steen
Hi Michael, Thanks for looking at my package again. > - why not fix the hyphen-used-as-minus-sign via a patch instead of overriding > the warning? Overriding a correct warning for the mere reason of silencing > lintian seems to be of no use. I first tried to create a patch, but I could not add

Re: RFS: open-axiom

2011-09-04 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:35:12 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > > 2. I set build-dep to sbcl >= 1.0.30, but I see sbcl has an epoch. > >Should I change it? sbcl >=2:1.0.30 (wheezy and sid have 2) ? > > no, you don't need the epoch. I have been corrected on IRC that indeed the epoch is necessary.

Re: RFS: xxxterm

2011-09-04 Thread Luis Henriques
Hi, On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 04:20:17PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > It's ok to keep the file, but you can't use it as-is. I think a conversion > during package build is the easiest solution and AFAIK other packages do so as > well. Again, thanks for you time. I've just uploaded a new packa

Re: RFS: fizsh

2011-09-04 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Guido, > Dear Michael, and other mentors, > > Thank you very much for reviewing my package! > > I corrected the errors you spotted. I also added a "lintian-override" > file to suppress the lintian "hyphen-used-as-minus-sign" tag. (This > "override-file" will not be needed anymore when Upstrea

Re: RFS: fizsh

2011-09-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Guido van Steen wrote: > I corrected the errors you spotted. I also added a "lintian-override" > file to suppress the lintian "hyphen-used-as-minus-sign" tag. (This > "override-file" will not be needed anymore when Upstream releases a > newer version of fizsh.) You

Re: RFS: xxxterm

2011-09-04 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, [...] > > E: xxxterm: menu-icon-not-in-xpm-format usr/share/xxxterm/xxxtermicon32.png > > > > If that could be fixed, the package should be ready to be uploaded. > > Thank you for your review. > > As the png files within the package are provided by upstreams, I thought > it would be OK to k

Re: RFS: fizsh

2011-09-04 Thread Guido van Steen
Dear Michael, and other mentors, Thank you very much for reviewing my package! I corrected the errors you spotted. I also added a "lintian-override" file to suppress the lintian "hyphen-used-as-minus-sign" tag. (This "override-file" will not be needed anymore when Upstream releases a newer versio

Re: RFS: xxxterm

2011-09-04 Thread Luis Henriques
Hi Michael, On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 06:49:36PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi, > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xxxterm". > > > > * Package name: xxxterm > >Version : 1.518-1 > >Upstream Author : Several (Marco Peereboom ) > > * URL : http

Re: RFS: open-axiom

2011-09-04 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:54:43 +0400, Igor Pashev wrote: > 03.09.2011 19:22, David Bremner пишет: > 1. Is it ok to use different lisps on different archs? >Or is it better to wait for sbcl (in lenny there were many archs) ? Yes, that is OK. > > 2. I set build-dep to sbcl >= 1.0.30, but I see

Re: RFS: open-axiom

2011-09-04 Thread Igor Pashev
03.09.2011 19:22, David Bremner пишет: > On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:34:23 +0400, Igor Pashev wrote: > Other architectures will be built on the autobuilder network, all going > well. For the second question, it depends how long the package takes to > pass through NEW. It is usually pretty quick these