Re: RFS: sxiv

Hi, 2011/9/7 Jakub Wilk > * Daniel Echeverry , 2011-09-07, 16:15: > > > http://mentors.debian.net/**debian/pool/main/s/sxiv/sxiv_**0.9-1.dsc >> > > I tried to build the package with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt, but -O2 was used > as

Re: RFS: sxiv

* Daniel Echeverry , 2011-09-07, 16:15: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sxiv/sxiv_0.9-1.dsc I tried to build the package with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt, but -O2 was used as optimization anyway. Could you please fix that? -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-r

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package; NMU for RC bugs among others)

On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:08:57 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > > OK - do you have any pointers to migration documentation? The main > > > intent of the NMU was to fix the FTBFS, not really overhaul the whole > > > package, but it would i

Re: RFS: sxiv

Hi, $ tar -tvvf sxiv_0.9.orig.tar.gz | grep '/debian/$' > drwxr-xr-x epsilon/epsilon 0 2011-07-07 21:19 sxiv-0.9/debian/ > > Huh? > > -- > Jakub Wilk > > Fixed. Please checkout: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sxiv/sxiv_0.9-1.dsc Thank you! -- Epsilon http://www.rinconinformat

Re: Becoming DM [was: Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs]

Hi Chris, [...] > > I would very much appreciate your help. May I email you? > I wouldn't claim I could answer all your questions, especially when it comes to games-specific ones, but at least I'll try my best to help. So yes, please go ahead. Best, Michael pgp6wMMNMscgR.pgp Description: PG

Re: Becoming DM [was: Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs]

On 06/09/2011 23:47, Michael Tautschnig wrote: Hi Chris, [...] As said above: I for one would be perfectly fine to offer this kind of mentoring to you. I'm not sure whether you had ever had a negative answer to such a request for mentorship - have you ever asked for it (before)? I had a men

Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs

[...] > > The BTS provides a good way to track requests. But mentors.d.n does, > too. On the other hand, the BTS doesn't have a useful interface to > search, filter and sort RFSes based on various criterias, such as: > - is the package already in Debian? (sponsoring a second upload is > easier)

Re: RFS: django-autoslug

* Jocelyn Delalande , 2011-09-06, 01:46: First of all, as it's my initial post here ; so I just wanted to say Hi to you all, I hope we'll happy-hack together :-). I'll mainly work with Python packaging, as it's a language I know well, love fairly. I use some nice pieces of python software missi

Re: RFS: slurm 0.4.0-1

Matthias Schmitz wrote on 2011-09-07 16:21: > * Package name: slurm >Version : 0.4.0-1 > * License : GPL-2 >Section : net Thanks for updating this package. It seems you have started as upstream by yourself, too - right? It would be very nice to see a home of

Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs

On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 09:53:07 AM, Arno Töll wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On 06.09.2011 16:49, Paul Wise wrote: > > I'm concerned that this might turn out about as useful as filing an > > RFP bug against wnpp; not very useful at all. > > I am not sure, a mailing list is better suited. I was n

Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs

On 05/09/11 at 15:12 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Hi, > > I've been thinking about how mentors works lately (after watching > Asheesh's debconf11 talk). It seems like the 4 day response effort > worked somewhat well for a while, but kind of tailed off, and I've been > pondering what could be d

Re: RFS: sxiv

* Daniel Echeverry , 2011-09-04, 17:14: To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sxiv Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sxiv

Re: spotweb_0~20110903+gitab1d95b4-1_i386.changes REJECTED

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote: > Some of the compressed .js and .css files in the upstream source are not > accompanied by their uncompressed originals. I've now put those in > debian/extra_sources, to be able to generate the proper compressed files > at package build t

Re: spotweb_0~20110903+gitab1d95b4-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Michael, others, Sorry for the delay after the NAK from ftp-masters. I've prepared a new version, but there is something I'm now quite sure about. Some of the compressed .js and .css files in the upstream source are not accompanied by their uncompressed originals. I've now put those in debian/ext

RFS: slurm 0.4.0-1

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "slurm". * Package name: slurm Version : 0.4.0-1 * License : GPL-2 Section : net It builds those binary packages: slurm - Realtime network interface monitor To access further information about this pac

Re: adopting a package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Shaun, thanks for your interest to help Debian. On 07.09.2011 12:37, Shaun Silk wrote: > Do I have to find a sponsor for this package? How do I proceed? Yes, you need a sponsor. Please read [1][2] to get the idea. You may also find the New Mainta

adopting a package

I am adopting an orphaned package (ircii), I have changed the title to ITA, and I have also changed the owner using cont...@bugs.debian.org. As the last package built was from 2008, I have started work on building the 2011 version, patching the build system etc. I also have an account on mentor

Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, On 06.09.2011 16:49, Paul Wise wrote: > I'm concerned that this might turn out about as useful as filing an > RFP bug against wnpp; not very useful at all. > I am not sure, a mailing list is better suited. I was not thrilled to use the BTS

Re: dh_python2: error: no such option: --with

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > Hi, > you can remove this to workaround the dh_python2 issue: > >> # require to get dh_clideps >> include /usr/share/cli-common/cli.make > > the values set in this include are default now so it is not needed > anymore when you pass --with cli

[solved] Re: Packaging php app/scripts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/09/11 19:12, Игорь Пашев wrote: > # find > . > ./src > ./src/index.php > ./debian > ./debian/control > ./debian/rules > ./debian/changelog > ./debian/my-pkg.install > ./debian/compat > ./debian/copyright sic well, thx for your help with pointing

Re: dh_python2: error: no such option: --with

Hi, you can remove this to workaround the dh_python2 issue: > # require to get dh_clideps > include /usr/share/cli-common/cli.make the values set in this include are default now so it is not needed anymore when you pass --with cli to dh. Best Regards, Julian Taylor signature.asc Description:

Re: dh_python2: error: no such option: --with

Hi, On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:16 PM, David Paleino wrote: > On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:04:59 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > >> %: >>       dh $@ --with cli,python2 --parallel >> >> Unknown option: with >> dh_icons: warning: ignored unknown options in DH_OPTIONS >>    dh_perl -O--parallel >> Unknown

Re: dh_python2: error: no such option: --with

On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:04:59 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > %: > dh $@ --with cli,python2 --parallel > > Unknown option: with > dh_icons: warning: ignored unknown options in DH_OPTIONS >dh_perl -O--parallel > Unknown option: with > dh_perl: warning: ignored unknown options in DH_OPTIO

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package; NMU for RC bugs among others)

On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: Hi, > > OK - do you have any pointers to migration documentation? The main intent of > > the NMU was to fix the FTBFS, not really overhaul the whole package, but it > > would indeed be better to avoid leaving predictable future FTBFSe

Re: dh_python2: error: no such option: --with

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:37 AM, David Paleino wrote: > --with options go right after the target -- and they can be grouped together. [...] > > dh $@ --with cli,python2 --parallel Exact same error, using: %: dh $@ --with cli,python2 --parallel Unknown option: with dh_icons: warning: i

Re: dh_python2: error: no such option: --with

Le Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:23:27AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : > Dear mentors, > > I am trying to use the new dh for the gdcm package, as seen at: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/gdcm/trunk/debian/rules?view=markup Hi Mathieu, shouldn't it be --with cli,p

Re: dh_python2: error: no such option: --with

On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:23:27 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am trying to use the new dh for the gdcm package, as seen at: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/gdcm/trunk/debian/rules?view=markup > > [..] > dh $@ --parallel --with=cli --w

Re: dh_python2: error: no such option: --with

Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am trying to use the new dh for the gdcm package, as seen at: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian- med/trunk/packages/gdcm/trunk/debian/rules?view=markup >From your debian/rules: dh $@ --parallel --with=cli --with=python2 Now from `

dh_python2: error: no such option: --with

Dear mentors, I am trying to use the new dh for the gdcm package, as seen at: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/gdcm/trunk/debian/rules?view=markup However this package fails to build with: Unknown option: with dh_icons: warning: ignored unknown options in DH_OPTIO

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package; NMU for RC bugs among others)

On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 08:12:43AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:43:37 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Am 07.09.2011 00:57, schrieb Stephen Kitt: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "mail-notification". This > > > update would fix a couple of RC bugs (the usual E