Hello mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pysolfc".
* Package name: pysolfc
Version : 2.0-1
* URL : http://pysolfc.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
* Programming Lang: Python
* Description : A Python solitaire game collection
It builds the binary package: pysol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everyone,
our (not so) old host running http://mentors.debian.net was replaced
right before by shiny new hardware. For you, as user you shouldn't
hopefully notice the switch. The new hardware is much more powerful and
has plenty of disk space. H
* Jakub Wilk , 2011-09-21, 22:48:
unless you want to keep multiple versions of it in the archive at the
same people.
Err, of course I meant s/people/time/. Thanks to Arno for spotting this.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
Gergely Nagy writes:
> Wouldn't the "fixed" tag work for cases where the package is reviewed,
> and will be uploaded VerySoon(tm)?
Please disregard that, I had a brainfart. Apologies for the noise.
--
|8]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Ansgar Burchardt writes:
>>> - pending (closing the bug): Somebody will (did) upload the package
>>> (no further changes required).
>>
>> I'm not sure if "pending" would be ever useful (except maybe for
>> uploads to DELAYED).
>
> Hmm, I thought about using it in case the sponsor did review the
* Ole Streicher , 2011-09-21, 16:42:
I am currently packaging the "wcslib" package (Bug #641624) as my first
Debian package, and I am wondering about the naming conventions. The
package contains two libraries, some tools and an common API
documentation for both libraries. I would now make the f
Hi,
Jakub Wilk writes:
>>- Comments are sent to the BTS. Tags are used as follows:
>> - moreinfo: Open questions or changes are required before an upload.
>> - confirmed: Somebody did review the package and thinks it is
>> okay. (Not needed when the package is directly uploaded.)
>
> Let me bik
On 09/21/2011 12:49 PM, Daniel Kauffman wrote:
> ... for serving Adobe socket policy files.
What's that? How do you make them?
> The package is ready for sponsorship and can be downloaded from:
>
> http://socketpolicyserver.com
>
1/ The package is a native package, which isn't required for an Apa
* Ansgar Burchardt , 2011-09-21, 11:47:
I do not sponsor very much, but I am a bit unhappy about having comment
possibilities on both mentors.d.n and the mailing list with information
not forwarded.
Same here.
- A new pseudo-package mentors.debian.org (or whatever) is created; the
maintainer
Hi,
2011/9/20 Gergely Nagy :
>
> A few nitpickings from the sideline, if you don't mind (IANADD applies,
> and so on and so forth):
>
> * It would perhaps be a good idea to add a few more headers to
> debian/patches/01_license-headers.patch, like fill in the Author
> field, or add "Origin: Upstr
Dear list,
I am currently packaging the "wcslib" package (Bug #641624) as my first
Debian package, and I am wondering about the naming conventions. The
package contains two libraries, some tools and an common API
documentation for both libraries. I would now make the following binary
packages:
-
Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> Gergely Nagy writes:
>> Ansgar Burchardt writes:
>>> - mentors.d.n automatically closes RFS bugs for uploaded packages or
>>>packages that were removed from there. It may also automatically
>>>close inactive bugs.
>>
>> Apart from closing inactive bugs autom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
aside from my comments below I fully agree to both of your mails.
On 21.09.2011 14:33, Gergely Nagy wrote:
>> but I am a bit unhappy about having comment possibilities on both
>> mentors.d.n and the mailing list with information not forwarded.
Hi,
Gergely Nagy writes:
> Ansgar Burchardt writes:
>> - mentors.d.n automatically closes RFS bugs for uploaded packages or
>>packages that were removed from there. It may also automatically
>>close inactive bugs.
>
> Apart from closing inactive bugs automatically, I believe this is a
I wanted to comment on this thread, but for some reason, it always fell
off my radar. No more!
Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> I do not sponsor very much,
While I don't sponsor at all at the moment, because I'm not a DD right
now, if and when I become one, I do wish to sponsor from time to
time. And
Thanks it's working now.
Regards,
Jeroen
On 09/21/2011 12:02 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> On 21.09.2011 11:39, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
>> Same message for me:
>> http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnupg-pkcs11-scd
>
> I correct myself: Our clock is /supposed/ to run with UTC as local time.
> Now it rea
Hi,
I do not sponsor very much, but I am a bit unhappy about having comment
possibilities on both mentors.d.n and the mailing list with information
not forwarded. This results in duplicate work (for example I reviewed a
package that already had a review on mentors.d.n pointing out the same
issues
Hi Andrey,
>> > What is "This has to be exported to make some magic below work." (before
>> > 'export DH_OPTIONS')?
>> Hmm, apparently a remnants after dh_make
> No, looks like a blind copy-paste.
Fair enough, that could be the case of momentarily blindness of mine. :)
>
>> > If "At the moment
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 08:13:33PM +1000, onlyjob wrote:
> > You didn't fix Vcs-* per Arno comments in the ITP bug.
> I can't quite do it yet because I have no public repository.
Then remove the tags. They are optional.
> Given that our only option is merge, it looks like there will be no
> second
Dear Sune,
Thank for explaining this.
Cheers,
Dmitry.
On 21 September 2011 19:11, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2011-09-21, onlyjob wrote:
>> * Is it true that whoever happen to create an ITP first gets the
>> monopoly for packaging?
>> * If ITP always have priority, aren't we sending a
Dear Gergely,
What a brilliant explanation!
All the questions answered - much appreciated.
Thank you, thank you.
All the best,
Dmitry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
htt
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 12:11 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> On 21.09.2011 12:10, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
> > PS I can't delete my previous uploaded package: it gives me an internal
> > error 500, in details:
>
> That's a known (and fixed) bug, supposed to be deployed soon.
Right, thanks.
No more lintia
Hi Andrey,
Thank you very much for your feedback.
On 21 September 2011 16:31, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:21:00PM +1000, onlyjob wrote:
>> Could someone please kindly have a look at the package I've made
>> (and provide comments)?
> You didn't fix Vcs-* per Arno co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21.09.2011 12:10, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
> PS I can't delete my previous uploaded package: it gives me an internal
> error 500, in details:
That's a known (and fixed) bug, supposed to be deployed soon.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daem
Hi Arno,
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 12:02 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> On 21.09.2011 11:39, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
> > Same message for me:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnupg-pkcs11-scd
>
> I correct myself: Our clock is /supposed/ to run with UTC as local time.
> Now it really is (again).
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21.09.2011 11:39, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
> Same message for me:
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnupg-pkcs11-scd
I correct myself: Our clock is /supposed/ to run with UTC as local time.
Now it really is (again).
If both of you care enough, yo
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:15 +0200, Jeroen Nijhof wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When trying to upload packages to mentors.debian.net it fails due to
> time issue's. It seems like mentors is running behind in time.
> Or is it just me?
Same message for me:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnupg-pkcs11-scd
Che
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jeroen,
On 21.09.2011 11:22, Jeroen Nijhof wrote:
> Hi Arno,
> E: libpam-tacplus: tar-errors-from-data ./lib/security/pam_tacplus.so:
> time stamp 2011-09-21 08:46:23 is 6411.189313009 s in the future
Don't worry, that's Lintian, not a reject. Your
Hi,
When trying to upload packages to mentors.debian.net it fails due to
time issue's. It seems like mentors is running behind in time.
Or is it just me?
Regards,
Jeroen Nijhof
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2011-09-21, onlyjob wrote:
> * Is it true that whoever happen to create an ITP first gets the
> monopoly for packaging?
> * If ITP always have priority, aren't we sending a wrong message
> for ambitious maintainers who might be tempted to create ITP early in
> order
>to secure
(Note: I didn't have a look at either package; I merely read the
preceding discussion in the bug log)
>From what I've read so far, my impression is that this is not a
technical issue, but more a social / team-work... misunderstanding,
perhaps.
So read my comments below, with these things in mind.
31 matches
Mail list logo
