Where to place man-pages, when building multiple packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi there! I'm just working on packaging. When I build on source into 2 pkgs. Theese are the two packages: jailkit -- here go all the c-binaries jailkit-common -- here go python-scripts, manpages, other no-arch After building the pkg, lintian

Where to place man-pages, when building multiple packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi there! I'm just working on packaging. When I build on source into 2 pkgs. Theese are the two packages: jailkit -- here go all the c-binaries jailkit-common -- here go python-scripts, manpages, other no-arch After building the pkg, lintian

Re: debian/rules override_dh_auto_build-indep

On 2011-11-10 08:20, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hi all, > Hi > I have been trying to split indep operations from the rest on the > activiz.net package, see: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/activiz.net/trunk/debian/rules?view=markup > > However the -indep rule

Re: Where to place man-pages, when building multiple packages

On 2011-11-10 10:01, Björn Esser wrote: > Hi there! > Hi, > I'm just working on packaging. When I build on source into 2 pkgs. > > Theese are the two packages: > > jailkit -- here go all the c-binaries > jailkit-common -- here go python-scripts, manpages, other no-arch > > After building

Re: Where to place man-pages, when building multiple packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 > "Newer" versions of lintian (around 2.5.1 or so) will check direct > dependencies (that are built from the same source) if said dependencies > are processed together. > > So if you placed your manpage correctly in jailkit-common and jailkit > dep

Re: Where to place man-pages, when building multiple packages

Hi! Am 10.11.2011 10:37, schrieb Björn Esser: >> "Newer" versions of lintian (around 2.5.1 or so) will check direct >> dependencies (that are built from the same source) if said dependencies >> are processed together. [..] > So what shall I try to get things fixed? What version of lintian are you

Additional lintian warnings in mentors upload

I've noticed that the lintian check on my mentors uploads are a bit more strict than the lintian checks on my PC; for example, lintian on mentors catches version numbering intended for debian native packages. I want to eliminate such warnings and errors before I upload rather than discovering them

Re: Where to place man-pages, when building multiple packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 lintian -V shows me: Lintian v2.4.3+squeeze1 It's the one which is shipped on default with Squeeze. Am 10.11.2011 10:58, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl: > Hi! > > Am 10.11.2011 10:37, schrieb Björn Esser: > >>> "Newer" versions of lintian (ar

Re: Where to place man-pages, when building multiple packages

Hi! Am 10.11.2011 11:02, schrieb Björn Esser: >> What version of lintian are you using? > lintian -V shows me: Lintian v2.4.3+squeeze1 > > It's the one which is shipped on default with Squeeze. http://backports-master.debian.org/ has an updated lintian package for squeeze, please always use that

Re: Additional lintian warnings in mentors upload

On 2011-11-10 10:59, Ole Wolf wrote: > I've noticed that the lintian check on my mentors uploads are a bit more > strict than the lintian checks on my PC; for example, lintian on mentors > catches version numbering intended for debian native packages. I want to > eliminate such warnings and errors

Re: Where to place man-pages, when building multiple packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 10.11.2011 10:01, Björn Esser wrote: > jailkit -- here go all the c-binaries > jailkit-common -- here go python-scripts, manpages, other no-arch why? Wouldn't it make slightly more sense to put the manpage where the corresponding executable

Re: RFS: yast2-devtools

Hi, Björn Esser writes: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yast2-devtools". I'm just curious: what is this used for? Isn't YaST only used by SuSE? Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li

Re: RFS: yast2-devtools

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10.11.2011 11:42, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > I'm just curious: what is this used for? Isn't YaST only used by SuSE? YaST has been liberated from its non-free origins a while ago. There even was an approach to introduce it to Debian once [1]. So, in

Re: debian/rules override_dh_auto_build-indep

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:25:27AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2011-11-10 08:20, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > I have been trying to split indep operations from the rest on the > > activiz.net package, see: > > > > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/activiz.net/trunk/

Re: Where to place man-pages, when building multiple packages

On 2011-11-10 11:55, Arno Töll wrote: > Hi, > On 10.11.2011 10:01, Björn Esser wrote: >> jailkit -- here go all the c-binaries >> jailkit-common -- here go python-scripts, manpages, other no-arch > > why? Wouldn't it make slightly more sense to put the manpage where the > corresponding executa

RFS: scrotwm (already in Debian)

Dear mentors, I’m looking for a sponsor for my package “scrotwm”. * Package name : scrotwm Version : 0.9.34-1 Upstream Authors : Marco Peereboom , Ryan McBride , Darrin Chandler * URL : http://opensource.conformal.com/

Re: Additional lintian warnings in mentors upload

Quoting Niels Thykier : How do you use lintian? lintian pkg_ver_arch.deb lintian src_ver.dsc lintian src_ver_arch.changes Ah, my bad. I thought lintian should only be applied to the .deb files. -- OLE WOLF[1] Rødhættevej 4 * 9400 Nørresundby Telefon: 9632-0108 * Mobil: 2467-5526 * S

Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors

Hi everyone, I have the same problem with my package 'uhub': http://mentors.debian.net/package/uhub Yesterday evening I uploaded updated version of the package via http. And dput said me that upload was successful. But there is no bot message in my e-mail and there is no updated package in m.d.n

Re: Additional lintian warnings in mentors upload

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Ole Wolf wrote: > Ah, my bad. I thought lintian should only be applied to the .deb files. It might be interesting to find out where you got that impression from, so that we can prevent other people from getting the same impression in the future. -- bye, pabs ht

Re: Additional lintian warnings in mentors upload

Hi, > I've noticed that the lintian check on my mentors uploads are a bit more > strict than the lintian checks on my PC; for example, lintian on mentors > catches version numbering intended for debian native packages. I want to > eliminate such warnings and errors before I upload rather than d

Bug#648299: uscan; whitespace in filename

Package: devscripts Version: 2.10.69 Mathieu Malaterre writes: > Has anyone work with upstream tarball with a space in the filename ? > I could get uscan to work (--verbose), however --repack fails > miserably on the following file: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/collab-maint/deb-maint/op

ITS: scrotwm (already in Debian)

On 2011-11-10 11:51, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > Dear mentors, > > [...] > > The package is already in Debian; however, the packaged version is really > old (almost two years) and my usual sponsor is no longer able to review > and upload it further due to time constraints. > > I would be glad if s

Re: Additional lintian warnings in mentors upload

Quoting Paul Wise : Ah, my bad. I thought lintian should only be applied to the .deb files. It might be interesting to find out where you got that impression from, so that we can prevent other people from getting the same impression in the future. I'm sure I got the impression from

Re: Additional lintian warnings in mentors upload

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Ole Wolf wrote: > I'm sure I got the impression from some web page that provided a howto on > building a package. I don't recall which one, unfortunately. Ok. > Nevertheless, the reason I relied on that web page was that I find it > difficult to follow manuals su

Re: RFS: yast2-devtools

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 10.11.2011 12:08, schrieb Arno Töll: > On 10.11.2011 11:42, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> I'm just curious: what is this used for? Isn't YaST only used by SuSE? YaST was licensed under GPLv2 somewhen in 2004/2005. So it can be used by anyone and ins

uploaded package as if it belong to someone else

Hi Mentors, Just wanted to share a peculiar situation with package upload: Recently I uploaded a package to mentors for review, but it didn't show in http://mentors.debian.net/packages/my (Fortunately I could get a URL for .dsc file from confirmation email so it wasn't much of a problem apart fr

Re: RFS: python-libmemcached

thx, I will try to fix that. 2011/11/9 Jakub Wilk > * Shell Xu , 2011-11-04, 15:53: > > > http://mentors.debian.net/**package/python-libmemcached >> >> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: >> >> dget

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 04:54:34PM +, mezgani ali wrote: > > All job is done Andrey, what do you think ? > You've renamed README.Debian to README.source. > > debian/patches/01_network.patch: > - Why Forwarded: not-needed? > - Origin

Re: RFS: cxxtest - xUnit-like framework for C/C++ applications

Hello Michael. No interesting reply from the upstream authors. Only one of the authors reply me but asking the others what they want to do about the missing license header in the source files. I suggested some alternative to release the new version of cxxtest with the license header, but they d

Re: ITS: scrotwm (already in Debian)

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:56:57PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > As the subject suggests I am willing to sponsor the package. :) I’m glad to hear that! > But > before I do; have you considered enabling hardning flags in your > package? A basic example of how to do it can be seen the a

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 03:36:40PM +, mezgani ali wrote: > Why may i rename my work to MIT ? Because you have the copyright. > please explain , if i understand i have to remove GPL-3 and let the > package licence as is it What should I explain? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digit

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]

Andrey, all changes is updated please take a look to my package. On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 03:36:40PM +, mezgani ali wrote: > > Why may i rename my work to MIT ? > Because you have the copyright. > > > please explain , if i understan

RFS: dwm (Adapted package)

Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for package dwm. This package was orphaned by its previous maintainer. This upload will close #647088. The package can be accessed using dget -X http://silpa.org.in/~vasudev/dwm/dwm_5.9-1.dsc I was trying to upload to mentors from past one week with no luc

RFS: aclock.app/0.2.3-3.1 (NMU to fix RC bug)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of "aclock.app". It fixes #645921. I'd be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aclock.app/aclock.app_0.2.3-3.1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: RFS: aclock.app/0.2.3-3.1 (NMU to fix RC bug)

On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Yavor Doganov wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of "aclock.app". > It fixes #645921. > > I'd be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. I am looking into it now. cheers, Andrea signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors

I have just tried again twice. Result is still negative. Any suggestions? 10.11.2011, 13:49, "Boris Pek" : > Hi everyone, > > I have the same problem with my package 'uhub': > http://mentors.debian.net/package/uhub > > Yesterday evening I uploaded updated version of the package via http. And dput

RFS: jailkit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jailkit". * Package name: jailkit Version : 2.14-1 Upstream Author : Olivier Sessink * URL : http://olivier.sessink.nl/jailkit/ * License : BSD-3

Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors

Ok. I found temporary solution for myself. I had deleted the package before new upload. And uploaded package was successfully added again in m.d.n. and I received appropriate confirmation from bot. But this is not common solution. And this bug is really serious. 10.11.2011, 19:48, "Boris Pek" :

Re: RFS: jailkit

* BjĂśrn Esser , 2011-11-10, 19:57: http://mentors.debian.net/package/jailkit Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jailkit/jailkit_2.14-1.dsc (I don't intend to sponsor this package.) The package fail

Re: ITS: scrotwm (already in Debian)

On 2011-11-10 17:08, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:56:57PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As the subject suggests I am willing to sponsor the package. :) > > I’m glad to hear that! > Hi, >> But >> before I do; have you considered enabling hardning flags in y

Re: debian/rules override_dh_auto_build-indep

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:25:27AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: >> On 2011-11-10 08:20, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> >   I have been trying to split indep operations from the rest on the >> > activiz.net package, see: >> > >> > http://anonscm.de

Re: debian/rules override_dh_auto_build-indep

Mathieu Malaterre writes: > buildd can make the decision to run build-indep, I am ok with it. > What I am not ok with, is when buildd are setup to run build-indep > rules, but do not respect B-D-I ! > That does not make any sense for me. > > Anyway I have merged B-D-I into B-D, as suggested. And

RFS: php-pecl-http - extended HTTP support for php5

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "php-pecl-http". * Package name: php-pecl-http Version : 1.7.1+dfsg.1-1 Upstream Author : Michael Wallner * URL : http://pecl.php.net/package/pecl_http * License : BSD-2 Section : web

Re: RFS: yubiserver (new package in Debian, 2nd try)

On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:50:29AM +0200, Nanakos V. Chrysostomos wrote: >It needs automake package in the Build-Depends field. I will upload a >new update in a few hours. Uploaded. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: yubiserver (new package in Debian, 2nd try)

Thank you very much. On 11 Νοε 2011, at 0:27, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:50:29AM +0200, Nanakos V. Chrysostomos wrote: It needs automake package in the Build-Depends field. I will upload a new update in a few hours. Uploaded. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: ITS: scrotwm (already in Debian)

2011/11/10 Niels Thykier > On 2011-11-10 17:08, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:56:57PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> As the subject suggests I am willing to sponsor the package. :) > > > > I’m glad to hear that! > > > > Hi, > > >> But > >> before I do

RFS: acsccid (squeeze-backports)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "acsccid". * Package name: acsccid Version : 1.0.2-3~bpo60+1 Upstream Author : Advanced Card Systems Ltd. * URL : http://acsccid.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL-2.1+ Section : libs It build

Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors

2011/11/11 Boris Pek : > Ok. I found temporary solution for myself. I had deleted the package before > new upload. > And uploaded package was successfully added again in m.d.n. and I received > appropriate > confirmation from bot. > > But this is not common solution. And this bug is really seriou

Re: RFS: dwm (Adapted package)

On 10.11.2011 20:52, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I'm looking for a sponsor for package dwm. This package was orphaned > by its previous maintainer. This upload will close #647088. Hm. So I become curious and looked into its homepage -- http://dwm.suckless.org/ . And there, there's