Re: RFS: Cacti

2012-01-02 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 02:19:19PM +0700, Mahyuddin Susanto wrote: Hi, cacti - Frontend to rrdtool for monitoring systems and services This upload will be fixed #653863 which is RC bug. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: Diff looks sensible,

Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-rpaf

2012-01-02 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:36:51PM +0300, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote: Hi, It builds those binary packages: libapache2-mod-rpaf - module for Apache2 which takes the last IP from the 'X-Forwarded-For' header in theory I'm willing to sponsor an upload (well I did the QA upload of this package a

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight. dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc Why do you list temporary files in debian/source/include-binaries? They should be removed by

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: And the version with unpatch and the include removed? From the error I suspect you moved the dh_testdir one line up behind the clean. With: # include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make # clean: unpatch clean: dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread werner
Hi Ansgar, thank you for your hints. Why do you list temporary files in debian/source/include-binaries? They should be removed by the clean target (dh_clean). You're right. I just forgot to remove the file. Fixed. Keeping dh_testdir in the clean target also should not hurt. Thanks. Added to

RFS: gemrb

2012-01-02 Thread Oliver Sauder
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gemrb. I have recently updated it to the newest gemrb version 0.7.0 and therefore trying to request sponsorship one more time. * Package name: gemrb Version : 0.7.0-1 Upstream Author :

Re: RFS: boot-repair

2012-01-02 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello, [ I don't intend to upload this package ] On 2011-12-30 11:14, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote: and i read that Canonical plans to integrate it into Ubuntu 12.04 CD (i think deadline is mid-January) Why Debian as project should care about deadlines of some commercial companies? Quick

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: I've recreated and reuploaded the package. It looks okay, but you should no longer need neither the build dependency on quilt (the include in d/rules is gone) nor the d/README.source (it's a standard format and d/changelog already mentions it was deleted).

Re: RFS: Cacti

2012-01-02 Thread Mahyuddin Susanto
Hi On 02/01/12 16:55, Sven Hoexter wrote: Diff looks sensible, so uploaded. Hope your team members don't mind. My team mate still on vacation Thanks for sponsoring! -- [ Mahyuddin Susanto ] - http://udienz.web.id GPG: 4096R/90B36C5B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread werner
Hi Ansgar, thanks - again :) It looks okay, but you should no longer need neither the build dependency on quilt (the include in d/rules is gone) nor the d/README.source (it's a standard format and d/changelog already mentions it was deleted). deleted quilt dependency, deleted

Re: RFS: boot-repair

2012-01-02 Thread yannubu...@gmail.com
Hello consider writing more interesting information in RFSes, such as what this software actually does. Sorry if i expressed wrong, i just wanted to say to Boot-Repair can be a useful software for Debian. Here is the long description (thanks Thomas for your advice): Description: Graphical

Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-rpaf

2012-01-02 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 02.01.2012 11:38, Sven Hoexter wrote: I'm not sure how near we're to new Apache release but maybe the deprecation notice would be more appropriate in a NEWS file? But maybe that can wait until we acutally have it in Debian. Httpd 2.4 is

Re: RFS: boot-repair

2012-01-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/02/2012 10:05 AM, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote: Happy new year ! I disabled the update from PPA, removed the setup.py, created the packages.install files, moved data to debian/tmp and changed the rule to %:dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp See

Re: RFS: boot-repair

2012-01-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/02/2012 10:05 AM, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote: Happy new year ! I disabled the update from PPA, removed the setup.py, created the packages.install files, moved data to debian/tmp and changed the rule to %:dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp See

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, Since I might be interested in using this software, I had a quick look to the packaging. I've noticed some issues that are remaining. Ansgar, feel free to correct me if you don't agree with my remarks! * Please run lintian with the options -Ii -E --pedantic so it will show you more issues

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread werner
Hi Thomas, hi Ansgar, thanks for the hints. I will improve the package as suggested by you and let you know when I'm done :) Cheers, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread werner
Hi, * Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the DEP5 specifications. It'd be great if you could update that.

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread werner
Hi, ntian with the options -Ii -E --pedantic so it will show you more issues (like spelling mistakes in the man pages, etc.). I wont details them here, since Lintian does it better than me! :) Thanks for the hint. How do you handle spelling errors by the upstream author in the relevant

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread werner
Hi, As per: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/ the latest revision seem to be 240. Thanks, that worked for me :) Cheers, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/03/2012 03:02 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Hi, * Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the DEP5

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread werner
Hi Thomas, * Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the DEP5 specifications. It'd be great if you could update

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/03/2012 03:03 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Thanks for the hint. How do you handle spelling errors by the upstream author in the relevant manpages? Should i create patches for it? How's the workflow handling spelling errors by the upstream author? Best is to create a patch,

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Dienstag, den 03.01.2012, 04:10 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand: OK, got it *but* what revision do i have to use? http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=? Thanks, Werner As per: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/ the latest

Re: RFS: python-mplayer

2012-01-02 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Olivier Schwander olivier.schwan...@chadok.info, 2011-12-30, 17:28: I'd recommend using the upstream name (mplayer.py) for the source package name. The upstream author seems to change the name of the project nearly at each release but, ok, I'll try to stick to it. Actually it seems I

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-02 Thread werner
Hi again :) Best is to create a patch, include it in your Debian package, and forward that patch to upstream so he can have his manpage fixed upstream as well (so you will later remove the debian-specific patch). I've created a new Patch which fixes the spelling errors and mentioned that in