Just a general remark just came into my mind about the symbols
dicssusion:
Is is really *safe* to use inline methods as API in libraries?
My belly states "no", because you might found yourselg to be unable to
fix bugs in library, if the software using the interface will use a
inline here and if t
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my non-maintainer upload of the package
libxml2, version 2.7.8.dfsg-5.2.
The changes introduced:
* Enabled hardened build flags (Closes: #654903).
* error.c: Fix __xmlRaiseError (Closes: #622358).
More information here:
http://mentors.debian.net/pa
Am 24.12.2011 12:23, schrieb David Kalnischkies:
> It's not only aptitude, every package manager using libapt will hate
> you for this - and therefore i will hate you; even on Christmas. ;)
I wouldn't want you to hate me. At least not on Christmas. ;-)
> In general, you should NEVER touch a file
Le Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:45:50PM +0300, Andrew Shadura a écrit :
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my non-maintainer upload of the package
> libxml2, version 2.7.8.dfsg-5.2.
Dear Andrew,
libxml2 has been orphaned, and two persons proposed themselves to co-maintain
it. Have you tried to conta
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:26:42AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Just a general remark just came into my mind about the symbols
> dicssusion:
>
> Is is really *safe* to use inline methods as API in libraries?
Just trying to test this with the following code:
#include
class test
{
public:
inli
* Roger Leigh , 2012-01-08, 11:38:
I'm most surprised about the functions only being compiled on use even
without the inline. Maybe I need to take them out of the class
definition and inline the separate functions.
Yes, all member functions that are defined within the class body are
consider
>> drwright - Known as typing break in GNOME 2
>
> No need to mention GNOME 2 in the short description, since the package
> is unrelated to GNOME 2.
Thank you, but Michael Biebl informed me about that:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654970
I have changed the description to some
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "texi2html".
* Package name: texi2html
Version: 5.0-1
Upstream Author : Francesco Cecconi
* URL : http://www.nongnu.org/texi2html/
* License : GPLv2
Section : te
Hi,
* Andrew Shadura [2012-01-08 11:51]:
[...]
> More information here:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/libxml2
>
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libx/libxml2/libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-5.2.dsc
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Please follow the no
* Nico Golde , 2012-01-08, 13:40:
More information here:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/libxml2
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libx/libxml2/libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-5.2.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Please follow the normal NMU procedures
http://w
Hi,
* Jakub Wilk [2012-01-08 13:50]:
> * Nico Golde , 2012-01-08, 13:40:
> >>More information here:
> >>
> >> http://mentors.debian.net/package/libxml2
> >>
> >>
> >>http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libx/libxml2/libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-5.2.dsc
> >>
> >>I would be glad if someone uploaded t
Hi,
can anyone re-upload the package ? :)
regards,
Werner Detter
Am 07.01.12 11:45, schrieb wer...@aloah-from-hell.de:
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I've just installed my policyd-weight package from unstable. There my
> /etc/default/policyd-weight file is not created, currently I'm not sure
> if the ver
Hi Ansgar,
hi everybody,
>>> Stable is frozen, we do not change packages there unless there is a very
>>> good reason to do so. The bug you are fixing does not seem to qualify as
>>> release critical thus we need to deal with the problem as is.
>>
>> OK, thanks for your details. I do also think, t
Hi Ansgar,
hi everybody,
>>> Stable is frozen, we do not change packages there unless there is a very
>>> good reason to do so. The bug you are fixing does not seem to qualify as
>>> release critical thus we need to deal with the problem as is.
>> OK, thanks for your details. I do also think, that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 08.01.2012 15:52, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> It would just be one modification to fix that bug (e.g. comment out the
> non functional blacklist). What is the right way to go here? This Bug is
> fixed in my latest uploaded package to
Hi,
I’m updating a debian/copyright file in DEP5 format, but I’m finding
myself unable to pick an acceptable value for the Format: field.
The previous value, from an earlier version of the package, is
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?op=file&rev=135
lintian correctly wa
* Simon Chopin , 2012-01-07, 10:10:
But anyway, on i386 I get this lintian error:
E: libchromaprint0: symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision
on symbol
_ZNSt6vectorIdSaIdEE14_M_fill_insertEN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPdS1_EEjRKd@Base
and 2 others
I added a specific symbol
On 08.01.2012 16:47, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m updating a debian/copyright file in DEP5 format, but I’m finding myself
> unable to pick an
> acceptable value for the Format: field.
Hi Andrea,
yes that's quite a mess. Please cf.:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/09/msg00056.
Andrea Bolognani writes:
> I’m updating a debian/copyright file in DEP5 format, but I’m finding
> myself unable to pick an acceptable value for the Format: field.
This is a temporary transitional annoyance that exists for a long and
complex set of reasons that isn't really worth getting into, bu
Hello,
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 20:35:55 +0900
Charles Plessy wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my non-maintainer upload of the
> > package libxml2, version 2.7.8.dfsg-5.2.
> libxml2 has been orphaned, and two persons proposed themselves to
> co-maintain it. Have you tried to contact them ?
Dear mentors,
There's also thousands of example packages in the Debian archive that you
> can look into.
>
As said before i don't know any package using dh_install (if someone knows
one, please tell me), and i didn't find any relevant documentation about
implementing dh_install. If [dh_install in
Dear killian, dear mentors,
A new version of autoconf-archive.
Nothing fancy.
I removed quilt depends as you have asked previous time (now mentors lintian
report that it is missing but my local version is
ok).
>-(snip)-
>make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/autoconf-archive-20110917'
>rm -
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 09:58:25AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Andrea Bolognani writes:
>
> > I’m updating a debian/copyright file in DEP5 format, but I’m finding
> > myself unable to pick an acceptable value for the Format: field.
>
> This is a temporary transitional annoyance that exists for
Hi,
I tried building a package from beast and uploaded for simlicity this
stuff to
http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/beast-mcmc-help-wanted/
It contains six executable files in /usr/bin. Three of them are
starting nicely. These are beast-mcmc, beauti and loganalyser.
However, the o
On 01/06/2012 09:32 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I've received an email from Debian FTP-Masters with the information that the
> package got
> rejected:
>
> ---
> Reject Reasons:
> policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [ 'exceptions.NameErro
On 01/08/2012 10:27 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can anyone re-upload the package ? :)
>
> regards,
> Werner Detter
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=wer...@aloah-from-hell.de
It's in, as you can see!
I don't think re-uploading only for the /etc/default/policyd-weight
is
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 14:56 +0100, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks for the review! :)
> I have fixed a bunch of the things pointed out, and tried to justify
> those I have not.
>
> I have marked items which I consider incomplete yet with "###", it's
> either things that I am unsure how
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:17 AM, bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> A new version of autoconf-archive.
At the very least you should be linking to the dsc file.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
Andrea Bolognani writes:
> Given the situation, I guess I’ll just use the unversioned URI and hope
> DEP5 will become official soon.
Maybe put the version to a comment at least?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Le Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 04:47:34PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani a écrit :
>
> I’m updating a debian/copyright file in DEP5 format, but I’m finding
> myself unable to pick an acceptable value for the Format: field.
Dear Andrea,
there will be no syntax changes until DEP 5 is finished, so for a new
copy
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 06:42:27PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote:
> expected URL: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0
I've seen this url twice, including with the trailing slash.
However, it gives me a 404 from two Australian locations.
http://www.debian.org/doc/packagin
Le Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:09:54PM +1100, Craig Small a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 06:42:27PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote:
> > expected URL:
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0
> I've seen this url twice, including with the trailing slash.
>
> However, it g
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for new version 1.10-2 (updated) of my package
> "xiterm+thai".
Typo in txiterm.1:
"...\fBtxiterm\fP is a wrapper around the \fBxiterm+thai(1)\fP program
that invokes the *later* program..."
Should s/later/
Hi,
sorry that I could not look at your package even after I said that I
would earlier, but I did not have enough free time. But it was uploaded
in the end anyway :)
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
> Could you please re-upload the package? I've just uploaded the latest
> version to mentors. So
34 matches
Mail list logo
