Dear Gergely, debian-mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package couriergrey.
* Package name: couriergrey
Version : 0.3.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Matthias Wimmer m...@tthias.eu
* URL : http://couriergrey.com
* License : GPL-2+
Section :
Hi,
I have a source that needs to be repackaged due to some copyright
issues. From the Mentors FAQ, I found that I should name the package
foo-1.2.3+dfsg-1. So, I made a repacking script (should it have a
predefined name, btw?) like:
8---
#!/bin/sh
ver=$2
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:12:37 +0100, Olе Streicher wrote:
uscan debug: [...]
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
[...]
http://foo.bar.edu/foo/foo-1.2.3.tar.gz
Newest version on remote site is 1.2.3, local version is 1.2.3+dfsg
= remote site does not even have current version
--
Hi,
On 01/16/2012 02:12 PM, Olе Streicher wrote:
When I now run uscan -debug -f (to check the script), I get
uscan debug: [...]
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
[...]
http://foo.bar.edu/foo/foo-1.2.3.tar.gz
Newest version on remote site is 1.2.3, local version is 1.2.3+dfsg
=
This is my first post in this list and I couldn't find an older post in the
archives which answered my questions.
I need to package a commercial application for automatic installation in a
cluster, as well as not messing up the system. I want it to integrate well
with the Debian environment.
The
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:48:52PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
Hi,
before this falls through the cracks I've uploaded the package to get
the bug fixed.
in theory I'm willing to sponsor an upload (well I did the QA upload
of this package a few month ago) but I don't like people setting
Hi,
On 01/16/2012 03:27 PM, Ivan Reche wrote:
The package is just a directory with lots of binaries and it likes to
install itself in /opt. Besides that, it needs to set some environment
variables (similar to JAVA_HOME and friends).
What is the best way to approach this? Do I change the PATH
before this falls through the cracks I've uploaded the package to get
the bug fixed.
Thank you.
I'm sorry, but that was noted in comments. Feel free to drop this
control field.
Droped.
I don't see how I can judge if you're able to handle the package or not.
E.g. by looking in QA?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Sergey,
On 16.01.2012 17:28, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
Looks like DM does not make sence at all :(
I'm waiting for upload for months just in case of very
simple changeset (e.g. for rpaf or php-memcached).
You seem to misunderstand the DM
Dear mentors ,
could you please sponsor my package libpam-abl which fixes FTBFS bug #655119
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc
Thank you ,
Alex
On 05/07/2011 04:59 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
Package name: libpam-abl
License : GPL 2
* Alex Mestiashvili a...@biotec.tu-dresden.de, 2012-01-16, 19:21:
Dear mentors ,
could you please sponsor my package libpam-abl which fixes FTBFS bug #655119
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc
The changelog says debian/control added
On 01/16/2012 07:38 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Alex Mestiashvili a...@biotec.tu-dresden.de, 2012-01-16, 19:21:
Dear mentors ,
could you please sponsor my package libpam-abl which fixes FTBFS bug
#655119
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi there!
How shall software be handled, when it needs
- huge modifactions
- scripts to be replaced by 'debianized' ones
- to be extended by custom scripts or progs
when packaging it for debian?
Shall the custom / replaced stuff be
2012/1/17 Björn Esser:
- huge modifactions
Get those included upstream.
- scripts to be replaced by 'debianized' ones
Make those scripts generic but configurable, send the required changes
upstream and drop in a second configuration file overriding the
defaults.
- to be extended
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi there!
I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until now.
BR,
Björn.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
2012/1/14 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org:
* Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st, 2012-01-14, 15:56:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shaarli/shaarli_0.0.33beta-1.dsc
Shaarli contains the jQuery 1.6.2 minified file,
…for which we have no source. This is violation of
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package oss-compat. The updated package
adds a Multi-Arch declaration (#651335) and handles its configuration file
according to policy (#649507, which is RC).
The dsc is available at
2012/1/17 Björn Esser:
I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until now.
It is not currently accepted by the Debian archive:
http://bugs.debian.org/642801
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Emilien Klein wrote:
I've worked with upstream Shaarli to fix the issue with the inclusion
of the minified jQuery files. Upstream has released a tarball that
uses the jQuery CDN instead of the local minified files (which have
been removed from the archive)
You seem to misunderstand the DM status.
I don't think so, but thank you for explanation.
It is not a Debian Developer
Lite. It does not mean you, as a DM, are trusted to upload any given
package to Debian at any time.
It just a meaningless thing for now. See below.
If you got DM status
Marco Balmer ma...@balmer.name writes:
Dear Gergely, debian-mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package couriergrey.
Will have a look this week. Sorry for the delays.
--
|8]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Sergey,
On 16.01.2012 23:57, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
For example, that was not a very first upload (of mod_rpaf) for me.
But next time I should convince new sponsor and so on.
That's unfortunate, but this happens. I'm sorry for you, and I
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package oss-compat. The updated package
adds a Multi-Arch declaration (#651335) and handles its configuration file
according to policy (#649507, which is RC).
The dsc is available at
2012/1/16 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@googlemail.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi there!
How shall software be handled, when it needs
- huge modifactions
Modify original sources in Debian.
- scripts to be replaced by 'debianized' ones
- to be extended by
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
Yes, you should replace inside sources, and call it ~dfsg.
In general it should be +dfsg not ~dfsg.
~dfsg/+dfsg should only be added when repacking for DFSG-related
reasons, so not in this case.
--
bye,
pabs
Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com writes:
Yes, you should replace inside sources, and call it ~dfsg.
Is the source being repackaged for DFSG reasons? If not, ‘~dfsg’ is a
confusing choice.
--
\ “Religious faith is the one species of human ignorance that |
`\ will not admit of
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
I note that the package is installable on hurd-*. AFAICT Hurd doesn't
support sound or Alsa so maybe it should not depend on 'hurd' or
should switch to architecture linux-any (or linux-all if that
existed)?
The kind folks on #debian-hurd
Is the source being repackaged for DFSG reasons? If not, ‘~dfsg’ is a
confusing choice.
VirtualBox src ships with binary *.exe, which are forbidden in Debian.
I don't know specific paragraphs of violations.
But I'm just a Debian-student, not mentor (@_@)
--
-Alexey Eromenko Technologov
--
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
Hello again, upstream has now released Red Eclipse 1.2 and hence this is
partly a RFS, partly a re-review request.
...
[1]
Is this motivation good enough for not using stand-alone Enet?
Hmm, I don't have a good answer for that.
[2]
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 03:00:04AM +0200, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
Is the source being repackaged for DFSG reasons? If not, ‘~dfsg’ is a
confusing choice.
VirtualBox src ships with binary *.exe, which are forbidden in Debian.
.exe file are fine, as long as they can be rebuilt with free
30 matches
Mail list logo
