Re: Re: RFS: quickrdp

2012-01-21 Thread Tobias Eliasson
On 2012-01-15 16:49, Jakub Wilk wrote: The comment at the top of d/rules doesn't make sense. Please remove it. debian/docs is empty. Just remove it. Why "Priority: extra"? The upstream makefile hides compilation commands. Please patch it not to do that. The program is built without debugging

Re: Making mentors.debian.net a .org (was: proposed new pseudo-package 'debian-mentors' for handling sponsoring requests)

2012-01-21 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:47:59PM +0100, Arno Töll wrote: > DSA is the team which makes a DNS CNAME record, or provides a hosting > facility. In my interpretation they are not making facts by that. Making > mentors.debian.net a .org makes the project official part of Debian, > just like any other

Re: RFS: libqsi

2012-01-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jasem Mutlaq wrote: > The driver that requires this library (INDI QSI driver) is released > under the LGPL v2.1. However, the library itself (QSI) is proprietary > and there is no open source alternative as this is a very special > purpose library for controlling a

Re: RFS: git2cl

2012-01-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > My apologies, I didn't mean to be rude for not replyng - I only noticed this > email of yours just now. Sorry for missing it. No probs. > I reckon we can always talk first, before engaging the punishment actions. :) My action was definite

Re: RFS: tupi -- 2D Animation design and authoring tool

2012-01-21 Thread Paul Wise
2012/1/18 Dmitry Smirnov : > I'm still looking for a sponsor for package "tupi". > > # >  Tupi: 2D Magic is a design and authoring tool for digital artists interested >  in 2D Animation, offering an interface experience focused on 8-100 years old >  kids. It's source code is based on the KTooN

Re: RFS: git2cl

2012-01-21 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Hi Paul, On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:36:45 Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > > > This wouldn't be a problem with responsive upstream. > > I already tried to contact him but he is not answering to emails. > > This was also confirmed by other people who tried

Re: RFS: tupi -- 2D Animation design and authoring tool

2012-01-21 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:40:03 Paul Wise wrote: > You might want to get involved in the multimedia team: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMultimedia > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/Join > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ Thank you, I'll consider this. Frankly this ide

Re: RFS: watermelons

2012-01-21 Thread Jakub Wilk
(Sorry for the late reply! :P) * Stephen M. Webb , 2011-09-16, 10:47: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/watermelons/watermelons_1.1.1-1.dsc The Larabie font is non-free. You have the following choices: 1) Document this fact in debian/copyright and move the package to non-free. 2) R

RFS: tk-table

2012-01-21 Thread Ole Streicher
Dear mentors, hello Andrew, Andrew Shadura writes: > For that to work properly, you have to call tcltk-depends during > package build process. > > Tcl manpages need to be installed within section 3tcl or 3tk, not 3. > > Also, why compat level 5? If you used 7 or later, dh_installchangelogs > wo

Re: RFS: libpam-abl , bug fix , package is already in Debian

2012-01-21 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
On 01/20/2012 06:28 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Alex Mestiashvili , 2012-01-16, 20:16: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc >>> The changelog says "debian/control added DM-Upload-Allowed", but >>> 0.4.2-1 had already this field. >>> >>> What do y

RFS: cxxtest - lightweight xUnit-like framework for C/C++ applications

2012-01-21 Thread Simone Rossetto
Hello mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cxxtest". CxxTest is a lightweight xUnit-like testing framework for C/C++ applications. Writing test is easier and simpler than others C/C++ testing frameworks because it is not required to register them. Once the test case is written, it

Re: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg

2012-01-21 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Samuel Bronson , 2012-01-21, 00:38: * Package name: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg Does "non-dfsg" really need to be a part of source package name? What if FSF decides to free the documentation one day? -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a su

Re: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg

2012-01-21 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:09:35PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Samuel Bronson , 2012-01-21, 00:38: > >* Package name: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg > > Does "non-dfsg" really need to be a part of source package name? > What if FSF decides to free the documentation one day? Then this source package wi

Re: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg

2012-01-21 Thread Samuel Bronson
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:09:35PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> * Samuel Bronson , 2012-01-21, 00:38: >> >* Package name    : gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg >> >> Does "non-dfsg" really need to be a part of source package name? >> What if FSF decides t

Re: RFS: acetoneiso (same upstream, closing 2 debian bugs)

2012-01-21 Thread Nick Andrik
Hi Ansgar, You can find an updated version of the package in the same place http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acetoneiso/acetoneiso_2.3-2.dsc Thank you very much for the review Regards, Nick -- =Do- N.AND Στις 20/01/2012 04:30 μμ, ο/η Ansgar Burchardt έγραψε: Hi, Nick Andrik wri

Re: RFS: acetoneiso (same upstream, closing 2 debian bugs)

2012-01-21 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Nick Andrik writes: > You can find an updated version of the package in the same place > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acetoneiso/acetoneiso_2.3-2.dsc I just uploaded the package. Thanks for your contribution to Debian :) Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ment

Re: RFS: jbigkit

2012-01-21 Thread Michael van der Kolff
Can I please get a mentor, reviews, anything for jbigkit 2.0-1? Cheers, Michael On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Michael van der Kolff wrote: > OK, I've simplified and renamed the debian revision to 2.0-1 (Yeah, I > know, the history went backward...) > > Is anything else required? > > Cheers,

RFS: dwb

2012-01-21 Thread Nathan Owens
I thought I would give it a try again, I don't know if my origional message were seen or not. I have packaged dwb, which allows a person to "click" links by using key shortcuts similar to vi or vim. It uses the webkit as the rendering engine. URL: http://portix.bitbucket.org/dwb/ License:GPL-3