On 24.01.2012 02:55, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> As for the usertag names, I came up with the following when writing
> support for this into reportbug:
>
> 'new': "a sponsorship request for a brand new package",
> 'update': "a sponsorship request for an update to
Hi!
Am 25.01.2012 08:58, schrieb Vasudev Kamath:
> I'm working on to prepare QA upload for surf which is orphaned by its
> previous maintainer. There is a FTBFS bug reported against this
> package [1]. But I'm not able to reproduce this bug. Package builds
> fine on the pbuilder clean chroot. I'v
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:24:27 +0100, Michael Stummvoll wrote:
> On 24.01.2012 02:55, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > As for the usertag names, I came up with the following when writing
> > support for this into reportbug:
[..]
> How would I tag a sponsorship request of an ITA-Package? It matches neith
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:28:49 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> I'm working on to prepare QA upload for surf which is orphaned by its
> previous maintainer. There is a FTBFS bug reported against this
> package [1]. But I'm not able to reproduce this bug. Package builds
> fine on the pbuilder clean chr
Don Armstrong writes:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Would something as simple as "Requests for package review and
>> sponsorship" be appropriate?
>
> That's fine for me, assuming it's ok with everyone else.
It's fine for me as well.
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi,
I have done possible changes. Hoping for more help.
On Mon, January 23, 2012 7:49 pm, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> debian/control:
> * Homepage: There is an extra space after the website URL, better to
> remove it. You could add the final / too, although that is not required
Fixed this.
> should
tags 656755 +patch
thanks
While I really agree to this statement I think there is few chance that
somebody else will step in. We are just needing to maintain this as a
predependency for two important packages of the Debian Med team.
Ok I took pity on you and took a look at the Makefile.am in th
Hi Andreas,
Shall we have a crack at this on Saturday?
> > If you can't handle this then I don't think you are competant to be
> > maintaining this package in debian. Knowing how the components of
> > the software they are packaging fit together and how to fix the
> > build systems to produce pac
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Medhamsh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have done possible changes. Hoping for more help.
Hello,
DISCLAIMER:
I don't know if i am supposed to "review" packages since
(a)I cant upload to debian.
(b)I myself am a maintainer of just one package :).
My intention is to help out.
Hi Peter,
many thanks for the patch which was in fact helpful to solve the problem.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:04:13AM +, peter green wrote:
> Ok I took pity on you and took a look at the Makefile.am in that
> directory, turns out it wasn't that hard to disable building of the
> CPU with SSE
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Michael Stummvoll wrote:
> I uploaded a new version of the suckless-tools package:
> * dropped st now, cause its maintained by the stterm-packe.
> * included sprop and lsx from the suckless-upstream into the package.
> * changed slock to not suid root b
Hello List:
Yesterday I upload my package with dput at http://mentors.debian.net :
the uploading worked fine, and mentors.debian.net sent me a email.
But it appeared that the URL of my package,
http://mentors.debian.net/package/bibtool ,
is somehow wrong as there is some kind of interference:
th
Hi!
"lguignard.deb...@gmail.com" writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dhcp-probe".
>
> * Package name: dhcp-probe
>Version : 1.3.0-10
>Upstream Author : Irwin Tillman
> * URL : http://www.net.princeton.edu/software/dhcp_probe/
> * License :
Hello,
On Wed, January 25, 2012 5:01 pm, harish badrinath wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Medhamsh wrote:
> complains, only about a missing changelog. Upstream does not seem to ship
> a changelog with the distribution tarball/zip file.
There seems a changelog in the upstream's website
Dear GCC Maintainers,
Perhaps I should have CC'd you in the first place, but here's a copy now:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Samuel Bronson
Date: Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:38 AM
Subject: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
> > >> Hence, please add a "sponsorship-requests" pseudo-package with
> > >> debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed from
unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as found in
experimental). Could you do this? Nikita, could you sponsor the package?
Matthias
On 25.01.2012 19:05, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Dear GC
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed
> from unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as
> found in experimental). Could you do this? Nikita, could you sponsor the
> package?
Su
Dear all,
I uploaded to mentors a new version of apt-spy [1]. After the Paul
Wise's kind review [2] [3] I reworked the package and switched to
git.debian.org both for upstream work and debian work. I need a review
of the package before going on with the upload. I know the package is
not lintian cle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 25.01.2012 18:15, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> So I feel stuck:
> is there a way to fix this issue ?
> despite it, can I begin to look for a sponsor ?
I just fixed that. Please re-upload your package and you will be the
owner of it. Of course this d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "not-yet-commons-ssl".
* Package name: not-yet-commons-ssl
Version : 0.3.9-1
Upstream Author : Julius Davies
* URL
Hello List:
I have just tried to re-upload my package, but without success:
I get the message:
Package has already been uploaded to debexpo on mentors.debian.net
Nothing more to do for bibtool_2.53-1_amd64.changes
I guess that something has to be reset.
Jerome
On 25/01/12 22:11, Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 25.01.2012 23:21, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Package has already been uploaded to debexpo on mentors.debian.net
> Nothing more to do for bibtool_2.53-1_amd64.changes
Remove the .upload file or pass -f to dput. That's a local error.
- --
with kin
Thanks for the prompt reply:
the re-upload finally succeeded.
Now I will step forward: find a sponsor.
Jerome
On 25/01/12 23:23, Arno Töll wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 25.01.2012 23:21, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Package has already been uploaded to debexpo on men
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "skstream":
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/skstream
/skstream_0.3.8-1.dsc
It builds these binary packages:
libskstream-0.3-6 - iostream-based C++ socket library
lib
Dear mentors, dear TeX maintainers:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bibtool".
* Package name: bibtool
Version : 2.53-1
Upstream Author :Gerd Neugebauer
* URL
:http://www.gerd-neugebauer.de/software/TeX/BibTool/index.en.html
* License : GPL-1+
Howdy!
INADD, so I can't sposor
I did try a test-build, and got the following result in a sid pbuilder env --
## --- ##
## confdefs.h. ##
## --- ##
/* confdefs.h */
#define PACKAGE_NAME "skstream"
#define PACKAGE_TARNAME "skstream"
#define PACKAGE_VERSION "0.3.8"
#define PACKAG
On a rebuild it worked.
Something odd's going on here.
-T
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> INADD, so I can't sposor
>
> I did try a test-build, and got the following result in a sid pbuilder env --
>
>
> ## --- ##
> ## confdefs.h. ##
> ## ---
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 657393 affects + skstream
Unknown tag/s: affects, skstream.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experime
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 657393 affects + src:skstream
Unknown tag/s: affects, src:skstream.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 657393 + src:skstream
Bug #657393 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: skstream/0.3.6-1 [ITA] -- IOStream C++
socket Library
Added indication that 657393 affects src:skstream
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 653977 by 657393
Bug #653977 [wnpp] ITA: skstream -- Isostream C++ socket library
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 653977: 657393
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Dear Paul
Thank you for your review.
I filed #657110 on lintian to check for commented out Vcs-* fields
pointing at collab-maint (which is created by dh_make). Please
consider implementing a patch for it so that others don't make the
same mistake.
Done. I removed the comment.
You might want
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "v8cgi", for which I'm also
the upstream author.
v8cgi is a multi-purpose wrapper around V8 Javascript engine: it can
be used as a shell-scripting language/environment, CGI/FastCGI binary
or Apache module. It resembles Node.js, but comes wit
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "surf". This package is
orphaned and I've prepared a QA upload for the same. The package can
be downloaded with
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/surf/surf_0.4.1-5.dsc
Thi
35 matches
Mail list logo
