Thanks for the precision:
versionning with cvs really confused me.
On 22/02/12 05:43, Bartosz Feński wrote:
W dniu 22.02.2012 02:42, Jerome BENOIT pisze:
Thanks for the prompt reply.
On 22/02/12 02:34, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Three days ago I u
W dniu 22.02.2012 02:42, Jerome BENOIT pisze:
Thanks for the prompt reply.
On 22/02/12 02:34, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Three days ago I uploaded for sponsoring my package with version
2.54+cvs20120219 which obviously cvs version.
You should have
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 13:59 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:58:45AM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> > Paul Wise wrote on 2012-02-21 09:28:
> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:40 AM, David Roguin wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm making some changes to the evolution package and every
On 22/02/12 02:41, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Jerome BENOIT , 2012-02-22, 01:46:
Three days ago I uploaded for sponsoring my package with version
2.54+cvs20120219 which obviously cvs version.
Meanwhile, more precisely yesterday, the upstream maintainer finally released
version 2.54, so now I plan t
Thanks for the prompt reply.
On 22/02/12 02:34, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Three days ago I uploaded for sponsoring my package with version
2.54+cvs20120219 which obviously cvs version.
You should have used 2.54~cvs20120219 instead, since that sort
* Jerome BENOIT , 2012-02-22, 01:46:
Three days ago I uploaded for sponsoring my package with version
2.54+cvs20120219 which obviously cvs version.
Meanwhile, more precisely yesterday, the upstream maintainer finally
released version 2.54, so now I plan to upload an upstream version of
my packa
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Three days ago I uploaded for sponsoring my package with version
> 2.54+cvs20120219 which obviously cvs version.
You should have used 2.54~cvs20120219 instead, since that sorts before
2.54 (note the special ~ character).
> Meanwhile, more p
Here is another review of manaplus:
If you contact upstream as a result of this review, please point them
at these two pages:
http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Games/Upstream
Did you intend for this to be maintained as part of the Debian games team?
Do you int
On 19.02.2012 14:11, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi Vedran,
Hey,
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:18:52 +0100, Vedran Furač wrote:
>
>> On 12.01.2012 11:21, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
>>
Hey, since you're DD, and I am not, would you be so kind and sponsor the
upload?
>>>
>>> I am and I
Hello List:
Three days ago I uploaded for sponsoring my package with version
2.54+cvs20120219 which obviously cvs version.
Meanwhile, more precisely yesterday, the upstream maintainer finally released
version 2.54, so now I plan
to upload an upstream version of my package with version 2.54.
But
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 627141 with 660519
Bug #627141 [wnpp] ITP: manaplus -- Advanced client Evol for Online and The
Mana World
Bug #627142 [wnpp] ITP: manaplus -- Advanced client Evol for Online and The
Mana World
Was blocked by: 658713
Added blocking bug(s) o
I've updated the packages on mentors and splitted the original one in
two. There's the main dwarf-fortress with binaries, data files and
scripts for modding support, and the default graphic mod package that
is also required. I've not re-uploaded the other third-party mods for
now but they would be
Vsevolod Velichko wrote:
> I'm very thankful for your package review. I've just fixed most of the
> things you mentioned. However, there're a couple of moments I'm
> unsure.
>
> > I: libjreen1: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libjreen.so.1.0.1
> There was a long "C++ vs symbols" discussion[1]
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Benoît Knecht , 2012-02-21, 13:36:
> >In the same file, you run compileall unconditionally; I guess it
> >should only run during configure.
>
> What's wrong with running it unconditionally?
Nothing wrong per se, it just seemed unnecessary...
> As far as I know, none of the
Hi,
maintai...@lftp-gtk.com writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lftp-gtk".
>
> * Package name: lftp-gtk
>Version : 1.5
> * URL : [http://www.lftp-gtk.com]
> * License : [gpl-2.0]
>Section : web
the package is far from meeting req
Dear Benoît,
I'm very thankful for your package review. I've just fixed most of the
things you mentioned. However, there're a couple of moments I'm
unsure.
> I: libjreen1: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libjreen.so.1.0.1
There was a long "C++ vs symbols" discussion[1] recently with pros and
Package: sponsorship-requests
Hi,
following [0], first upload has to be sponsored.
Could anyone please upload gnash to backports for me?
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnash/gnash_0.8.10-3~bpo60+1.dsc
[it should go in testing tomorrow]
Thanks.
--
Gabriele
[0] http://lists.debian
* Benoît Knecht , 2012-02-21, 13:36:
In the same file, you run compileall unconditionally; I guess it should
only run during configure.
What's wrong with running it unconditionally?
As far as I know, none of the Python helpers in the wild create
maintainer script fragments that'd check the fi
> Or make use of format 3.0 multi-orig feature.
That seems interesting, is it supported by git-buildpackage? #561071
makes me think it is not...
--
Beren Minor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:15:00PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote:
> > I'm not talking about patches, gbp and gbp-pq. I mean git checkout magic
> > in your Makefile.
> >
> > As with any other standalone Debian package, dget --build for .dsc URL or
> > dpkg-source -x and dpkg-buildpackage for downloaded o
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> For the reference: #598909.
> Also, glew doesn't seem to be needed.
That's what I was talking about. There's no answer to this bug and no
willing to add the sdl libraries to ia32-libs, because the ia32-libs
is though to be obsolete, repl
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:48:50PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote:
> The other correct way, as far as I could see, to have an i386 package
> available on amd64 is to use ia32-libs package, however this package
> does not contain all the required dependencies for dwarf-fortress
> (sdl-ttf, sdl-image and g
> > I'm not a Debian Maintainer and I'm also looking for advices and
> > comment on the way the game has been packaged, as the available
> > upstream binaries are 32bits only, and I had to embed 32bit libraries
> > with the package in order to have it work.
> You should not embed libraries. You al
Hi and thanks for you interest,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Did you try to contact the previous ITP owner?
I did, a year ago and before as well. The answer I got was "it's still
work in progress, we are trying to talk with the upstream author to
have a more FHS co
]] Michael Gilbert
> In this case, I think it would be possible to use ssh public keys as
> that authentication. The process would be:
This seems overly complex, why not just have the user put all those
files in a well-known location on alioth (or some other host) and have
the mentors code down
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:47:42PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwarf-fortress".
That's good news.
Unfortunately, the package is not ready yet.
> dwarf-fortress-bin - Dwarf Fortress binaries
> dwarf-fortress-data - Dwarf Fortress data files
> dwarf-fort
in-line :-
2012/2/21 Ansgar Burchardt :
> Hi,
>
> I think -project@ might be a better list for this.
>
> On 02/21/2012 03:14 PM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>> The info. I'm looking for is the physical infrastructure as to the
>> kinda specs (hardware specs of the machines) on the network are and if
>>
Hi,
I think -project@ might be a better list for this.
On 02/21/2012 03:14 PM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> The info. I'm looking for is the physical infrastructure as to the
> kinda specs (hardware specs of the machines) on the network are and if
> they are located at diverse locations (or not).
[DB
at bottom :-
2012/2/21 shirish शिरीष :
> Unfortunately though, most of the URI's shared don't seem to get/have
> a public-facing webpage . For instance to take the above e.g. both
> [09] [10] and don't seem to have a public-facing webpage via browser.
Did get my answer https://db.debian.org/mac
Hi all,
First of all I'm not a coder or a developer in anyway. So sorry
for butting onto the mailing list like this but don't know any place
better. So please either tell/share if there is a better mailing list
for the same or answer it here. Please CC me in replies as I'm not
subscribed to the
Obviously I meant mosh and not 'hello'. It was late. :)
Cheers,
--
David Banks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAOBNZ7ZD_9QsEyiC8BeNjjbgBO0nMA
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:58:45AM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Paul Wise wrote on 2012-02-21 09:28:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:40 AM, David Roguin wrote:
> >
> > > I'm making some changes to the evolution package and every time I want
> > > to test a tiny change I build a deb, install and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 660125 with 660128
Bug #660125 [wnpp] ITP: heybuddy - light identi.ca microblogging client
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 660125: 660128
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
block 660125 with 660128
thanks
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Martí wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "heybuddy".
>
> * Package name: heybuddy
>Version : 0.2.3-1
>Upstream Author : Jezra Johnson Lickter
> * URL : http://www.jezra.net/projects/heybuddy
> *
I am not subscribed to this list.
Hi!
I suggest you not to put any more energy into it - in case you didn´t
already notice yourself.
From what I have seen from Carl-Valentin Schmitt - whether that is his
real name or not I do not know - on debian-user-german[1], kernel-testers
mailinglist[2]
David Roguin wrote on 2012-02-20 21:40:
> Hi,
>
> I'm making some changes to the evolution package and every time I want
> to test a tiny change I build a deb, install and run it. As you can
> imagine that takes a lot of time.
>
> That's why I'm asking if there's a faster way to iterate over ch
Paul Wise wrote on 2012-02-21 09:28:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:40 AM, David Roguin wrote:
>
> > I'm making some changes to the evolution package and every time I want
> > to test a tiny change I build a deb, install and run it. As you can
> > imagine that takes a lot of time.
> >
> > That's wh
37 matches
Mail list logo
