Re: What happens when an architecture independent package won't build on all architectures?

2012-03-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Paul Elliott wrote: > The fact that a package is  architecture independent is no guarantee that the > package will build under all architectures. The package can "build depend" on > packages that don't exist for some architectures. > > But if the package once built

What happens when an architecture independent package won't build on all architectures?

2012-03-01 Thread Paul Elliott
The fact that a package is architecture independent is no guarantee that the package will build under all architectures. The package can "build depend" on packages that don't exist for some architectures. But if the package once built under any particular architecture, should then run under a

Bug#661664: RFS: pyswisseph/1.77.00-0-3 [ITP]

2012-03-01 Thread Paul Elliott
On Thursday, March 01, 2012 05:19:48 PM Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Paul Elliott , 2012-03-01, 14:03: > >On the issue of the pdfs, those pdfs are rebuilt from source in another > >package that depends on this package. > > Personally, I don't buy the “source is in another package” argument. It > might be

Bug#661664: RFS: pyswisseph/1.77.00-0-3 [ITP]

2012-03-01 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Paul Elliott , 2012-03-01, 14:03: On the issue of the pdfs, those pdfs are rebuilt from source in another package that depends on this package. Personally, I don't buy the “source is in another package” argument. It might be true for the time being (I didn't check), but next version of the

Bug#661853: RFS: kpdftool/0.23.1-1 [ITP] -- GUI to manipulate PDF and PS files using GhostScript and ImageMagick

2012-03-01 Thread Simone Rossetto
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kpdftool". KPDFTool can be used to perform basic and useful operations with PDF and PS files such as merge, extract pages and protect the text. All operations can be accomplished in a simpl

Processed: retitle 660175 to RFS: fcgi-daemon [ITP] -- Perl-aware FastCGI daemon ...

2012-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 660175 RFS: fcgi-daemon [ITP] -- Perl-aware FastCGI daemon Bug #660175 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: fcgi-daemon Changed Bug title to 'RFS: fcgi-daemon [ITP] -- Perl-aware FastCGI daemon' from 'RFS: fcgi-daemon' > retitle 661504 RFS: tk-htm

Bug#658426: xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X

2012-03-01 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Daniel Martí writes: > The new .orig.tar.gz has been modified because the folder it contained was > xfonts-bolkhov-1.1.20001007.orig, instead of xfonts-bolkhov-1.1.20001007. I > just renamed that folder and repacked the orig file. I know this breaks the > new revision thing, but as far as I know t

Bug#661664: RFS: pyswisseph/1.77.00-0-3 [ITP]

2012-03-01 Thread Paul Elliott
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 06:49:46 AM Jakub Wilk wrote: I will look into this and create a new version. It will probably take a while. On the issue of the pdfs, those pdfs are rebuilt from source in another package that depends on this package. References to those pdf's should be refered

Bug#659894: marked as done (RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server (new upstream version))

2012-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:51:37 +0100 with message-id <87fwdsm9xi@deep-thought.43-1.org> and subject line Re: Bug#659894: RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server (new upstream version) has caused the Debian Bug report #659894, regarding RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+

Bug#661831: RFS: texi2html/5.0-1

2012-03-01 Thread Francesco Cecconi
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "texi2html" * Package name : texi2html Version: 5.0-1 Upstream Author : Derek Price * URL : http://www.nongnu.org/texi2html/ * License

Bug#659894: RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server (new upstream version)

2012-03-01 Thread Benoît Knecht
Benoît Knecht wrote: > Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > Benoît Knecht writes: > > > dget -x > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.24+dfsg-1.dsc > > > > The package was removed due to a bug in the new debexpo version. Could > > you upload it again? > > Right, I h

Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP]

2012-03-01 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Daniel Martí , 2012-03-01, 15:22: I've removed postinst and prerm, and cleaned debian/rules of dh_python2 inside auto_install overrides (it builds exactly fine without it, so I guess it is run already by --with python2). Correct. I'd be very grateful if you could review it and upload it.

Bug#658426: xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X

2012-03-01 Thread Daniel Martí
tag 658426 - moreinfo thanks Dear Ansgar, The new .orig.tar.gz has been modified because the folder it contained was xfonts-bolkhov-1.1.20001007.orig, instead of xfonts-bolkhov-1.1.20001007. I just renamed that folder and repacked the orig file. I know this breaks the new revision thing, but as f

Bug#659894: RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server (new upstream version)

2012-03-01 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Ansgar, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Benoît Knecht writes: > > dget -x > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.24+dfsg-1.dsc > > The package was removed due to a bug in the new debexpo version. Could > you upload it again? Right, I had not realized, thanks. I

Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP]

2012-03-01 Thread Daniel Martí
Dear Jakub and Benoît, I've removed postinst and prerm, and cleaned debian/rules of dh_python2 inside auto_install overrides (it builds exactly fine without it, so I guess it is run already by --with python2). The new package is up at mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybudd

Re: RFS: python-gnupg

2012-03-01 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla''
On 2012-02-23 at 15:58:37 +0100, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > Thanks for your comments, I'm going to fix the package and reupload it. I've uploaded a new version which should fix most problems in the first attempt (and add new problems, of course), it is available at http://mentors.debian

Re: documentation for "Convenience copies of code" redundant regeneration?

2012-03-01 Thread Thibaut Paumard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 29/02/12 22:56, Paul Elliott a écrit : > > Question: Must I regenerate this Convenience copies of > Documentation from source, only to delete it, and refer to in > externally, Hi, If it sounds like nonsense, it probably is... Don't generate s