Hello,
I've faced the sources with the following copyright header:
/
**
** Copyright © 2009 Nokia Corporation and/or its subsidiary(-ies).
**
** Use, modification and distribution is allowed without limitation,
** warranty
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Vsevolod Velichko wrote:
> This header makes me think about public domain or WTFPL. However it's
> not strictly expressed, and neither me nor the upstream author (he's
> not the author of that code) is sure, how to express the copyright
> information in COPYING and
Hi,
[ I have no intention to sponsor this package. ]
On 03/29/2012 05:27 AM, Mike Miller wrote:
> openconnect (3.15-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * New maintainer
The package does not appear to be orphaned. Did you ask the current
maintainer if he is okay with you taking over the package?
Re
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [ I have no intention to sponsor this package. ]
>
> On 03/29/2012 05:27 AM, Mike Miller wrote:
>> openconnect (3.15-1) unstable; urgency=low
>>
>> * New maintainer
>
> The package does not appear to be orphaned. Did you ask the
Your message dated Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:10:56 +0200
with message-id <1333019424-sup-4...@stapelberg.de>
and subject line done
has caused the Debian Bug report #665823,
regarding RFS: libapache2-mod-geoip/1.2.7-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:24:34 +0200
with message-id <4f746292.5060...@users.sourceforge.net>
and subject line yorick-mpeg was uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #664835,
regarding RFS: yorick-mpeg [ITP] -- MPEG output support for the Yorick language
to be marked as done.
This
On 03/28/2012 05:25 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> - is it reasonable for the upstream repo to have a Debian branch,
> inverting the normal use-case of git-buildpackage? e.g gbp.conf:
>
> [DEFAULT]
> upstream-branch=master (not upstream)
> debian-branch=debian (not master)
>
When I'm at it, you might want to have a look here:
http://wiki.debian.org/GitPackagingWorkflow
Cheers,
Thomas
On 03/28/2012 05:25 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
>
> I am involved in several projects where I am either the founder of the
> project (e.g. dynalogin) or a contributor with full access
Your message dated Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:30:06 +0200
with message-id <87obrfnr29@deep-thought.43-1.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#663214: RFS: calamaris/2.99.4.0-18
has caused the Debian Bug report #663214,
regarding RFS: calamaris/2.99.4.0-18
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bwctl"
* Package name: bwctl
Version : 1.3-1
Upstream Author : Jeff Boote ,
Aaron Brown
* URL : http://www.internet2.edu/performance/bwctl/
*
Your message dated Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:11:56 +0200
with message-id <20120329211156.gm3...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Package uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #665655,
regarding RFS: fonts-dancingscript/1.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "peg"
* Package name: peg
Version : 0.1.7-1 Upstream Author : Ian Piumarta
* URL : http://piumarta.com/software/peg/
* License : MIT/X
Section
12 matches
Mail list logo
