Hi,
now, that you've updated your package I finally reviewed it. These are
my comments:
* Do not set urgency=high. There is no point in doing so unless you fix
a critical security issue.
* There is an invalid changelog.dch file left over. Please remove it.
* Do not modify previous changelog ent
Hi,
On 20.04.2012 22:27, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
> Do you want me the change the changelog also ?
Yes, of course you should mention things you fix in an upload. Moreover,
you shouldn't push the standards version in a NMU.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
Do you want me the change the changelog also ?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Arno Töll [mailto:a...@debian.org]
Verzonden: vrijdag 20 april 2012 22:09
Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg
CC: 669...@bugs.debian.org; mod-gnu...@packages.debian.org
Onderwerp: Re: Bug#669609: sponsorship-requests: NM
Hi,
On 20.04.2012 22:02, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
> The nmu is about #497097
I realize that, but I won't NMU a package because of a less severe bug.
I will, however, because you accidentally fix a serious bug along (but
you don't mention this in the changelog, see #667626 and #669476) unless
The nmu is about #497097
I mailed the owner 10 dayes a go no respons at all
But i also include the patch mentiond in #558232
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Arno Töll [mailto:a...@debian.org]
Verzonden: vrijdag 20 april 2012 21:47
Aan: 669...@bugs.debian.org; cont...@bugs.debian.org
CC:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 669609 !
Bug #669609 [sponsorship-requests] sponsorship-requests: NMU
mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1
Owner recorded as Arno Töll .
> tags 669609 + moreinfo
Bug #669609 [sponsorship-requests] sponsorship-requests: NMU
mod-gnutls/0.5.10-1.1
Added ta
owner !
tags +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Bastiaan,
please rework your changelog. Only by reading the changelog I wouldn't
know why it would be appropriate to NMU it. Did you try to contact the
maintainer? The problem was reported yesterday.
On 20.04.2012 14:11, Bastiaan Franciscus van den Dikkenberg wro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 669401 RFS: roxterm/2.6.2-1
Bug #669401 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: roxterm/2.6.1-1
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: roxterm/2.6.2-1' from 'RFS: roxterm/2.6.1-1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6
retitle 669401 RFS: roxterm/2.6.2-1
thanks
The Ubuntu PPA builder for lucid uncovered a backwards compatibility bug
so I've updated upstream and replaced the package so that uscan won't
complain about its not being the latest upstream.
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU for package "mod-gnutls"
It builds those binary packages:
libapache2-mod-gnutls - Apache module for SSL and TLS encryption with GnuTLS
To access further information about this package,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-django-evolution"
* Package name: python-django-evolution
Version : 0.6.7-1
Upstream Author : Christian Hammond, Russell Keith-Magee, Ben Khoo
* URL :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-django-djblets"
Package name: python-django-djblets
Version : 0.6.17-1
Upstream Author : Christian Hammond, David Trowbridge, Micah Dowty
URL : https://git
Hi Thomas
In d/bibtexconv.install you are installing src/bibtexconv{,-odt}. I
don't understand that since they are already installed by the build system.
Also I'm not sure about overriding the compression of the example files.
Any decent text editor will display them correctly even if compressed,
>> You need to add doxygen-latex and graphviz as build-deps.
>
> Rather as Build-Depends-Indep.
>
>> override_dh_auto_build:
>
> which would also run when building only the arch-dep packages. rather:
>
> build-doc:
>
>> cd doc ;\
>> rm -rf html/ ;\
>> qmake ;\
>>
Thomas,
Couple of quick comments:
* d/copyright does not contains copyrights for debian/* files. I
found also suspicious that Copyright is "2010-2011 Thomas Dreibholz",
shouldn't it be 2010-2012 ?
* d/control lists an empty 'Recommends:'
* d/rules I am not an autotools expert but I believe y
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bibtexconv". BibTeXConv is a BibTeX
file converter which allows one to export BibTeX entries to other formats,
including customly defined text output. Furthermore, it provides the
possibil
16 matches
Mail list logo
