Re: maximal or minimal deletion when creating dfsg tarball?

2012-04-23 Thread Paul Gevers
> It has been suggested by a respected reviewer that while I am removing the > unsourced binaries, I remove ALL of the "convenience copies of code". That > way > the unused code would not confuse anyone. > > I thought, that when creating a dfsg tarball, one should remove only the > files > wi

Bug#660982: marked as done (RFS: identicurse/0.9+dfsg0-1 [ITA] - simple Identi.ca client with a curses-based UI)

2012-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:07:02 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing #660982 has caused the Debian Bug report #660982, regarding RFS: identicurse/0.9+dfsg0-1 [ITA] - simple Identi.ca client with a curses-based UI to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#669722: RFS: gnunet/0.9.2-1 [ITA]

2012-04-23 Thread Bertrand Marc
Hello Christoph, Thank you for your answer. First of all, you are right: GNUnet has 2 dependencies in experimental (libextractor and libmicrohttpd). I intend to adopt and upload both to unstable (see RFS #669717 and #669719). With these, GNUnet shouldn't FTBFS. > uscan warning: In debian/watch no

Re: softlink creation in debian package

2012-04-23 Thread BRAGA, Bruno
See debian/links file. -- *Braga, Bruno* www.brunobraga.net bruno.br...@gmail.com On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:19 PM, karunakar medamoni < kannaiah.chi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > how to create symlink for a webapplication from > /usr/share/package-name to /var/www/package-name in debian pac

Re: maximal or minimal deletion when creating dfsg tarball?

2012-04-23 Thread Gergely Nagy
Paul Elliott writes: > It has been suggested by a respected reviewer that while I am removing the > unsourced binaries, I remove ALL of the "convenience copies of code". That > way > the unused code would not confuse anyone. > > I thought, that when creating a dfsg tarball, one should remove o

Re: Modifications of the changelog.

2012-04-23 Thread Gergely Nagy
Tomasz Muras writes: > On 04/22/2012 02:48 PM, Bernhard R. Link wrote: >> * Arno Töll [120421 11:51]: >>> The whole point of a changelog is a time dependent frozen point of view >>> at your package. Once you released a version of a package, you should >>> consider it untouchable >> >> I strongly

error while building debpackage for web

2012-04-23 Thread karunakar medamoni
cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/share/XAwu': No such file or directory dh_install: cp -a debian/tmp/usr/share/XAwu debian/xawu/var/www/htdocs/XAwu/ returned exit code 1 make: *** [binary-install/xawu] Error 2 --  Regards karunakar Department of sanskrit studies, SHMT project, University of Hyde

Re: error while building debpackage for web

2012-04-23 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 04/23/2012 01:48 PM, karunakar medamoni wrote: > cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/share/XAwu': No such file or directory > dh_install: cp -a debian/tmp/usr/share/XAwu > debian/xawu/var/www/htdocs/XAwu/ returned exit code 1 > make: *** [binary-install/xawu] Error 2 Please provide more information

Re: softlink creation in debian package

2012-04-23 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 04/23/2012 11:19 AM, karunakar medamoni wrote: > how to create symlink for a webapplication from > /usr/share/package-name to /var/www/package-name in debian package. > means when ever i will installed webapplicaton in any machine it > automatically create a symlink debian itself. As Bruno alr

Re: error while building debpackage for web

2012-04-23 Thread Gergely Nagy
karunakar medamoni writes: > cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/share/XAwu': No such file or directory > dh_install: cp -a debian/tmp/usr/share/XAwu > debian/xawu/var/www/htdocs/XAwu/ returned exit code 1 > make: *** [binary-install/xawu] Error 2 A bit more information would be appreciated. Where d

Re: Dependencies for FastCGI

2012-04-23 Thread Stefan Ott
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 18:07, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 04/17/2012 11:43 AM, Stefan Ott wrote: >> Hey mentors >> >> I have a question concerning one of my packages (fookebox). It >> currently depends on "libapache2-mod-wsgi | httpd-wsgi" since it's a >> web application that is typically called t

Re: softlink creation in debian package

2012-04-23 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Ansgar Burchardt wrote on 2012-04-23 13:53: > On 04/23/2012 11:19 AM, karunakar medamoni wrote: > As Bruno already said you can do so with dh_link(1), but note that it is > wrong for a package in the official archive to ship files in /var/www. A good way is using postinst script for check the env

Bug#670176: RFS: kismet/2011.03.R2-1 [ITA]

2012-04-23 Thread Nick Andrik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kismet" * Package name: kismet Version : 2011.03.R2-1 Upstream Author : Mike Kershaw * URL : http://www.kismetwireless.net/download.shtml * License : GPL/

Bug#670195: RFS: lierolibre/0.1-1

2012-04-23 Thread Martin Erik Werner
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org Thanks Dear mentors and pgk-gamers, I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "lierolibre" * Package name: lierolibre Version : 0.1-1 Upstream Author : (Me) Martin Erik Werner

Bug#670204: RFS: pylucene/3.5.0-1 ITA -- Python extension for accessing Java Lucene

2012-04-23 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pylucene" * Package name: pylucene Version : 3.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Apache Lucene developers * URL : http://lucene.apache.org/pylucene/ * License :

Bug#669167: marked as done (RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- Financial accounting, ERP)

2012-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:17:12 +0200 with message-id <20120423231712.ga28...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> and subject line Re: [Pkg-sql-ledger-discussion] New experimental LedgerSMB package, 1.3.15-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #669167, regarding RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- Fi

Bug#670195: RFS: lierolibre/0.1-1

2012-04-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Martin Erik Werner wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "lierolibre" A review, since you are upstream too, I'm including some advice related to that too. I would suggest using git2cl or 'git log' upstream to create the ChangeLog file. I note ma

Some questions related to signing

2012-04-23 Thread Christopher Howard
A few humble questions related to packaging signing: * I make binary deb packages available for my projects from my Web site, but I also wanted to make the deb source files available, so that people can wrap their own binary debs for other architectures. I know that they need the *.orig.tar.gz fil

Re: Some questions related to signing

2012-04-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Christopher Howard wrote: > * I make binary deb packages available for my projects from my Web site, > but I also wanted to make the deb source files available, so that people > can wrap their own binary debs for other architectures. I know that they > need the *.

Bug#670212: RFS: pentobi/1.2-1

2012-04-23 Thread Dean Evans
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Package name: pentobi Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Markus Enzenberger URL : http://pentobi.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL3 Section : games It builds those binary packages: pentobi- clone of Bloku

Re: Modifications of the changelog.

2012-04-23 Thread Ben Finney
Russ Allbery writes: > Ben Finney writes: > > [modifying previous changelog entries] breaks the entirely > > reasonable expectation: that a changelog only ever accumulates > > entries for the latest release, and nothing in earlier releases has > > changed since the last time the recipient read t

Re: Bug#665354: RFS: viennacl/1.2.1-1

2012-04-23 Thread Michael Wild
Dear mentors I am still looking for a sponsor for the upload of viennacl/1.2.1-1. My original sponsor, Michael Tautschnig, has not responded so far. Cheers Michael On 03/23/2012 11:42 AM, Michael Wild wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am lookin

Re: Modifications of the changelog.

2012-04-23 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi, On Di, 24 Apr 2012, Ben Finney wrote: > To say it more plainly: Modifying previous changelog entries, while not > prohibited, does break an implicit user expectation. I think that > expectation is reasonable to an extent, and breaking it is costly to the > same extent. But there are good reas