Bug#660014: marked as done (RFS: git-ftp/0.6.0+git20110923-1 [ITP] -- Git powered FTP client written as shell script)

Your message dated Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:11:37 +1000 with message-id <201204291711.37460.only...@member.fsf.org> and subject line Done: RFS: git-ftp/0.6.0+git20110923-1 [ITP] -- Git powered FTP client written as shell script has caused the Debian Bug report #660014, regarding RFS: git-ftp/0.6.0+git2

Bug#670696: RFS: burp/1.3.3-1

I don't understand, what the problem is. In this case we could not build burp on debian in version 1.3.2 this was major bug. Because people where asking me when i started packaging 1.3.2 i created a BUG reporting the problem. The isue was fixed in 1.3.3 so i think it is correct to close the bu

Processed: Re-orphaning

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 658306 ! Bug #658306 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: preload/0.6.4-2 [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon Owner recorded as Daniel Martí . > close 658306 Bug #658306 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: preload/0.6.4-2 [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon

Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP] (10th week)

Dear Mentors, I'm still looking for a sponsor for my package "heybuddy". To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/heybuddy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://me

Processed: Owner

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > submitter 660128 ! Bug #660128 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP] - light identi.ca microblogging client Changed Bug submitter to 'Daniel Martí ' from 'Daniel Martí ' > submitter 660125 ! Bug #660125 [wnpp] ITP: heybuddy -- lig

Bug#670851: RFS: plotter/2.2-1[ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "plotter" Package name: plotter Version : 2.2-1 Upstream Author : Ralf Jung URL : http://mathespiele.ralfj.de/programm.php?id=25 License : GPLv2 Section

Bug#664847: marked as done (RFS: z80dasm/1.1.3-1 -- disassembler for the Zilog Z80 microprocessor)

Your message dated Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:32:30 +0200 with message-id <4f9d893e.2010...@tablix.org> and subject line Re: Bug#664847: RFS: z80dasm/1.1.3-1 -- disassembler for the Zilog Z80 microprocessor has caused the Debian Bug report #664847, regarding RFS: z80dasm/1.1.3-1 -- disassembler for the Z

Bug#668112: marked as done (RFS: squidguard/1.4-5 -- filter and redirector plugin for Squid)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:01:07 +0200 with message-id <1335736867.6975.70.camel@LAPJFS> and subject line Bug #668112: RFS: squidguard/1.4-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #668112, regarding RFS: squidguard/1.4-5 -- filter and redirector plugin for Squid to be marked as done. This me

removing untracked files created by previous version

[Please Cc: me on replies.] Dear mentors, I maintain the package micro-evtd. I am preparing an updated version of my package to fix the serious bug #666218. My sponsor has asked me to seek your feedback on a separate bug that I found in my packaging. While running, micro-evtd periodically writ

Re: removing untracked files created by previous version

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Tandy wrote: > To sum up: any system that has had version 3.4-1 of micro-evtd > installed is likely to contain a status file in /usr/sbin that dpkg > doesn't know about, and I'm not sure what the best way to resolve this > is. Sounds like a serious bug. > T