Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libphidget21"
* Package name: libphidget21
Version : 2.1.8.20120507-1
Upstream Author : Phidgets Inc.
* URL : http://www.phidgets.com/
* License : LGPL-3
Hello everybody,
years after becoming DD, I am learning Debconf... amazing.
I could not find an explanation for the "Choices-C" field in debconf-devel(7)
nor the Developers Reference. Is that field clearly defined somewhere ?
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.deb
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "figlet"
* Package name: figlet
Version : 2.2.4-1
Upstream Author : Glenn Chappell, Ian Chai, John Cowan
* URL : http://www.figlet.org/
* License : BSD-3
S
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16.05.2012 00:41, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
>> GNS3 package is Debian has not been updated in the last year, and the
>> Debian maintainer, Erik Wenzel, went MIA. (doesn't answer to emails
>> for last few months)
>
> are there any traces o
Hi,
On 16.05.2012 00:41, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
> GNS3 package is Debian has not been updated in the last year, and the
> Debian maintainer, Erik Wenzel, went MIA. (doesn't answer to emails
> for last few months)
are there any traces of your approaches, e.g. in bug reports publicly
available? Hav
Le Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:41:58PM -0400, Alexey Eromenko a écrit :
> Hi All !
>
> GNS3 package is Debian has not been updated in the last year, and the
> Debian maintainer, Erik Wenzel, went MIA. (doesn't answer to emails
> for last few months)
Hi Alexey,
According to his QA page, the maintaine
Hi All !
GNS3 package is Debian has not been updated in the last year, and the
Debian maintainer, Erik Wenzel, went MIA. (doesn't answer to emails
for last few months)
As I'm upstream developer of GNS3 and a Debian user, I would like to
take on a responsibility to maintain GNS3 within Debian.
I
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "the-powder-toy"
* Package name: the-powder-toy
Version : 78.1-1
Upstream Author : HardWIRED and respective owners
* URL : http://powdertoy.co.uk/
* License
Andy Hawkins writes:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:10:29PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I think the previous pattern is not so helpful and we can also look at
>> it in a slightly different perspective, consistency with the pattern
>> used by other libs
> I'm not sure you can use all other libra
[Andy Hawkins]
> I think I'd prefer libmb5.so, as it maintains consistency with the
> libmb3 packages.
>
> It's also clearer to the person installing it exactly what they're getting.
> Otherwise, the libmb3 packages would have been called libmusicbrainz-6,
> which doesn't obviously tell them
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 2012-05-15 17:40, Stefan Ott wrote:
>> >>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-privacy-please".
>> >>>
>> >>> * Package name : pidgin-privacy-please
>> >>> Version : 0.7.1-1
>> >>> Upstream
Hi Stefan,
On 2012-05-15 17:40, Stefan Ott wrote:
> >>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-privacy-please".
> >>>
> >>> * Package name : pidgin-privacy-please
> >>> Version : 0.7.1-1
> >>> Upstream Author : Stefan Ott
> >>> * URL : http://pidgin-privacy-pl
On Tue, 15 May 2012, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> > * Are you sure about the location of the binary in the file system?
> > iptables is in /sbin, why do you install ipset to /usr/sbin?
>
> The ipset depends on libmnl which it is installed in /usr/lib or
> /usr/lib/[arch triplet] if it willing support
Hey mentors
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Stefan Ott wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Stefan Ott wrote:
>> Dear mentors
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Stefan Ott wrote:
>>> Dear mentors,
>>>
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-privacy-please".
>>>
>>> * Pac
On 05/15/2012 09:29 AM, David Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently working on a sanlock[1] package for Debian. My current
> attempts work good so far but some parts in the build process are
> rather complicated (no ./configure; have to run make twice) so I
> guess somebody more experienced shoul
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:21:37AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Seems the package isn't on mentors yet? I extracted the source tarball
> with pristine-tar.
Indeed, I later received a rejection: mentors has not updated their keyring
to reflect my new PGP key yet. (I then got another rejection for
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 14:08:46 +0200
with message-id <4fb2474e.70...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#672394: RFS: ipset/6.12-1 -- administration tool for
kernel IP sets
has caused the Debian Bug report #672394,
regarding RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP s
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tomoyo-tools"
* Package name: tomoyo-tools
Version : 2.5.0-20120414-0.1
Upstream Author : Tetsuo Handa
Toshiharu Harada
* URL : http:/
Hi,
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:10:29PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I think the previous pattern is not so helpful and we can also look at it
> in a slightly different perspective, consistency with the pattern used by
> other libs
I'm not sure you can use all other libraries as an example. A go
Le 15/05/12 11:26, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
> I agree that this is valid and that these libs/pkgs can co-exist
>
> My preference would be for the soname libmusicbrainz.so.5, is there any
> outright reason to avoid the other way of doing it, or it is largely at the
> discretion of upstream in each
Andy Hawkins wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I agree that this is valid and that these libs/pkgs can co-exist
>
>> My preference would be for the soname libmusicbrainz.so.5, is there
>any
>> outright reason to avoid the other way of doing it, or
Hi,
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I agree that this is valid and that these libs/pkgs can co-exist
> My preference would be for the soname libmusicbrainz.so.5, is there any
> outright reason to avoid the other way of doing it, or it is largely at
> the discretio
Mike Hommey wrote:
>On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 08:16:08AM +, Andy Hawkins wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In article <4fb20730.1090...@pocock.com.au>,
>>Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> > There has been some discussion on this list about flactag and
>libmusicbrainz
>> >
>> > libmusicbrainz SONAMEs hav
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 08:16:08AM +, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In article <4fb20730.1090...@pocock.com.au>,
>Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > There has been some discussion on this list about flactag and libmusicbrainz
> >
> > libmusicbrainz SONAMEs have a colourful history and this i
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package "eiskaltdcpp" which is already available in Debian.
Source package already has DMUA flag in Debian unstable and testing branches.
But new binary package
Hi,
In article <4fb20730.1090...@pocock.com.au>,
Daniel Pocock wrote:
> There has been some discussion on this list about flactag and libmusicbrainz
>
> libmusicbrainz SONAMEs have a colourful history and this is reflected in
> the way previous versions have been packaged
>
> e.g.
>
> S
Hi,
I'm currently working on a sanlock[1] package for Debian. My current
attempts work good so far but some parts in the build process are
rather complicated (no ./configure; have to run make twice) so I
guess somebody more experienced should do a deeper review before
I can send a RFS.
You can
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 670704
Bug #670704 {Done: Sven Eckelmann } [sponsorship-requests]
RFS: g3dviewer/0.2.99.5~svn130-2
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #670704 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 09:44:41 +0200
with message-id <2085065.kalqhqp...@sven-desktop.home.narfation.org>
and subject line Fwd: Accepted mupen64plus-core 1.99.5-3 (source all amd64)
has caused the Debian Bug report #671013,
regarding RFS: mupen64plus-core/1.99.5-3
to be marked as done
reopen 670704
thanks
Sry, send the -done mail to the wrong bug.
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 09:44 +0200
with message-id <1466920.qmyb3lt...@sven-desktop.home.narfation.org>
and subject line Fwd: Accepted mupen64plus-core 1.99.5-3 (source all amd64)
has caused the Debian Bug report #670704,
regarding RFS: g3dviewer/0.2.99.5~svn130-2
to be marked as done.
There has been some discussion on this list about flactag and libmusicbrainz
libmusicbrainz SONAMEs have a colourful history and this is reflected in
the way previous versions have been packaged
e.g.
SONAME = libmusicbrainz3.so.6
v2.1.x (currently in Debian, src pkg = libmusicbrainz-2.1) SONA
On 14/05/12 15:49, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:57:42AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
>>
>>http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
>>
> I'd rather see a correlation to the fact that some members
33 matches
Mail list logo
