Re: is wheezy frozen already?

2012-05-15 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 14/05/12 15:49, Andreas Tille wrote: On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:57:42AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html I'd rather see a correlation to the fact that some members of the

SONAME best practice

2012-05-15 Thread Daniel Pocock
There has been some discussion on this list about flactag and libmusicbrainz libmusicbrainz SONAMEs have a colourful history and this is reflected in the way previous versions have been packaged e.g. SONAME = libmusicbrainz3.so.6 v2.1.x (currently in Debian, src pkg = libmusicbrainz-2.1)

Bug#670704: marked as done (RFS: g3dviewer/0.2.99.5~svn130-2)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 09:44 +0200 with message-id 1466920.qmyb3lt...@sven-desktop.home.narfation.org and subject line Fwd: Accepted mupen64plus-core 1.99.5-3 (source all amd64) has caused the Debian Bug report #670704, regarding RFS: g3dviewer/0.2.99.5~svn130-2 to be marked as done.

Bug#670704: Fwd: Accepted mupen64plus-core 1.99.5-3 (source all amd64)

2012-05-15 Thread Sven Eckelmann
reopen 670704 thanks Sry, send the -done mail to the wrong bug. Kind regards, Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#671013: marked as done (RFS: mupen64plus-core/1.99.5-3)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 09:44:41 +0200 with message-id 2085065.kalqhqp...@sven-desktop.home.narfation.org and subject line Fwd: Accepted mupen64plus-core 1.99.5-3 (source all amd64) has caused the Debian Bug report #671013, regarding RFS: mupen64plus-core/1.99.5-3 to be marked as done.

Processed: Re: Fwd: Accepted mupen64plus-core 1.99.5-3 (source all amd64)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 670704 Bug #670704 {Done: Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org} [sponsorship-requests] RFS: g3dviewer/0.2.99.5~svn130-2 Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #670704 to the same values previously set thanks Stopping

Sanlock - Looking for review

2012-05-15 Thread David Weber
Hi, I'm currently working on a sanlock[1] package for Debian. My current attempts work good so far but some parts in the build process are rather complicated (no ./configure; have to run make twice) so I guess somebody more experienced should do a deeper review before I can send a RFS. You

Re: SONAME best practice

2012-05-15 Thread Andy Hawkins
Hi, In article 4fb20730.1090...@pocock.com.au, Daniel Pocockdan...@pocock.com.au wrote: There has been some discussion on this list about flactag and libmusicbrainz libmusicbrainz SONAMEs have a colourful history and this is reflected in the way previous versions have been packaged

Bug#672981: RFS: eiskaltdcpp/2.2.6-5 (updated) -- Direct Connect and Advanced Direct Connect client

2012-05-15 Thread Boris Pek
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my package eiskaltdcpp which is already available in Debian. Source package already has DMUA flag in Debian unstable and testing branches. But new binary packages

Re: SONAME best practice

2012-05-15 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 08:16:08AM +, Andy Hawkins wrote: Hi, In article 4fb20730.1090...@pocock.com.au, Daniel Pocockdan...@pocock.com.au wrote: There has been some discussion on this list about flactag and libmusicbrainz libmusicbrainz SONAMEs have a colourful history

Re: SONAME best practice

2012-05-15 Thread Daniel Pocock
Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 08:16:08AM +, Andy Hawkins wrote: Hi, In article 4fb20730.1090...@pocock.com.au, Daniel Pocockdan...@pocock.com.au wrote: There has been some discussion on this list about flactag and libmusicbrainz

Re: SONAME best practice

2012-05-15 Thread Andy Hawkins
Hi, On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: I agree that this is valid and that these libs/pkgs can co-exist My preference would be for the soname libmusicbrainz.so.5, is there any outright reason to avoid the other way of doing it, or it is largely at the discretion

Re: SONAME best practice

2012-05-15 Thread Daniel Pocock
Andy Hawkins a...@gently.org.uk wrote: Hi, On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: I agree that this is valid and that these libs/pkgs can co-exist My preference would be for the soname libmusicbrainz.so.5, is there any outright reason to avoid the other way of doing

Re: SONAME best practice

2012-05-15 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 15/05/12 11:26, Daniel Pocock a écrit : I agree that this is valid and that these libs/pkgs can co-exist My preference would be for the soname libmusicbrainz.so.5, is there any outright reason to avoid the other way of doing it, or it is largely at the discretion of upstream in each

Re: SONAME best practice

2012-05-15 Thread Andy Hawkins
Hi, On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:10:29PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: I think the previous pattern is not so helpful and we can also look at it in a slightly different perspective, consistency with the pattern used by other libs I'm not sure you can use all other libraries as an example. A good

Bug#672999: RFS: tomoyo-tools/2.5.0-20120414-0.1 [RC, NMU]

2012-05-15 Thread KURASHIKI Satoru
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package tomoyo-tools * Package name: tomoyo-tools Version : 2.5.0-20120414-0.1 Upstream Author : Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel _at_ I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp

Bug#672394: marked as done (RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 14:08:46 +0200 with message-id 4fb2474e.70...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#672394: RFS: ipset/6.12-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets has caused the Debian Bug report #672394, regarding RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP

Re: help with intra-package dependencies (library and binary)

2012-05-15 Thread Jon Dowland
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:21:37AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: Seems the package isn't on mentors yet? I extracted the source tarball with pristine-tar. Indeed, I later received a rejection: mentors has not updated their keyring to reflect my new PGP key yet. (I then got another rejection for

Re: Sanlock - Looking for review

2012-05-15 Thread Michael Wild
On 05/15/2012 09:29 AM, David Weber wrote: Hi, I'm currently working on a sanlock[1] package for Debian. My current attempts work good so far but some parts in the build process are rather complicated (no ./configure; have to run make twice) so I guess somebody more experienced should do

Re: RFS: pidgin-privacy-please

2012-05-15 Thread Stefan Ott
Hey mentors On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net wrote: Dear mentors On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package

Bug#672394: RFS: ipset/6.12-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets

2012-05-15 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 15 May 2012, Neutron Soutmun wrote: * Are you sure about the location of the binary in the file system? iptables is in /sbin, why do you install ipset to /usr/sbin? The ipset depends on libmnl which it is installed in /usr/lib or /usr/lib/[arch triplet] if it willing support

[done] Re: RFS: pidgin-privacy-please

2012-05-15 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi Stefan, On 2012-05-15 17:40, Stefan Ott wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-privacy-please.  * Package name    : pidgin-privacy-please  Version         : 0.7.1-1  Upstream Author : Stefan Ott  * URL             : http://pidgin-privacy-please.googlecode.com/  *

Re: [done] Re: RFS: pidgin-privacy-please

2012-05-15 Thread Stefan Ott
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org wrote: Hi Stefan, On 2012-05-15 17:40, Stefan Ott wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-privacy-please.  * Package name    : pidgin-privacy-please  Version         : 0.7.1-1  Upstream Author :

Re: SONAME best practice

2012-05-15 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Andy Hawkins] I think I'd prefer libmb5.so, as it maintains consistency with the libmb3 packages. It's also clearer to the person installing it exactly what they're getting. Otherwise, the libmb3 packages would have been called libmusicbrainz-6, which doesn't obviously tell them which

Re: SONAME best practice

2012-05-15 Thread Russ Allbery
Andy Hawkins a...@gently.org.uk writes: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:10:29PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: I think the previous pattern is not so helpful and we can also look at it in a slightly different perspective, consistency with the pattern used by other libs I'm not sure you can use all

Bug#673087: RFS: the-powder-toy/78.1-1 [ITP] -- Physics sandbox game

2012-05-15 Thread Aditya Vaidya
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package the-powder-toy * Package name: the-powder-toy Version : 78.1-1 Upstream Author : HardWIRED and respective owners * URL : http://powdertoy.co.uk/ * License

Maintainer of GNS3 Missing-in-Action, I volunteer

2012-05-15 Thread Alexey Eromenko
Hi All ! GNS3 package is Debian has not been updated in the last year, and the Debian maintainer, Erik Wenzel, went MIA. (doesn't answer to emails for last few months) As I'm upstream developer of GNS3 and a Debian user, I would like to take on a responsibility to maintain GNS3 within Debian. I

Re: Maintainer of GNS3 Missing-in-Action, I volunteer

2012-05-15 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:41:58PM -0400, Alexey Eromenko a écrit : Hi All ! GNS3 package is Debian has not been updated in the last year, and the Debian maintainer, Erik Wenzel, went MIA. (doesn't answer to emails for last few months) Hi Alexey, According to his QA page, the maintainer of

Re: Maintainer of GNS3 Missing-in-Action, I volunteer

2012-05-15 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 16.05.2012 00:41, Alexey Eromenko wrote: GNS3 package is Debian has not been updated in the last year, and the Debian maintainer, Erik Wenzel, went MIA. (doesn't answer to emails for last few months) are there any traces of your approaches, e.g. in bug reports publicly available?

Re: Maintainer of GNS3 Missing-in-Action, I volunteer

2012-05-15 Thread Alexey Eromenko
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote: Hi, On 16.05.2012 00:41, Alexey Eromenko wrote: GNS3 package is Debian has not been updated in the last year, and the Debian maintainer, Erik Wenzel, went MIA. (doesn't answer to emails for last few months) are there any

Bug#673096: RFS: figlet/2.2.4-1

2012-05-15 Thread Jonathan McCrohan
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package figlet * Package name: figlet Version : 2.2.4-1 Upstream Author : Glenn Chappell, Ian Chai, John Cowan * URL : http://www.figlet.org/ * License : BSD-3

About the field Choices-C Debconf templates.

2012-05-15 Thread Charles Plessy
Hello everybody, years after becoming DD, I am learning Debconf... amazing. I could not find an explanation for the Choices-C field in debconf-devel(7) nor the Developers Reference. Is that field clearly defined somewhere ? Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team,

Bug#673098: RFS: libphidget21/2.1.8.20120507-1 [ITP]

2012-05-15 Thread Jonathan McCrohan
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libphidget21 * Package name: libphidget21 Version : 2.1.8.20120507-1 Upstream Author : Phidgets Inc. supp...@phidgets.com * URL : http://www.phidgets.com/ *