Re: Can I adopt removed package?

2012-05-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:27:58 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:58 AM, KURASHIKI Satoru wrote: I want to adopt this package because I'm planning to ITP the package (rt-extension-calendar) which depends on this library.

Re: Bug#672290: RFS: uhub/0.4.0~git20120423-9efe4bc-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub

2012-05-24 Thread Boris Pek
Hi, Two weeks passed without any reply. And I am still looking for a sponsor for the package. Current version (0.3.2-1) of package in Debian Sid is FTBFS on s390 and s390x. I reported bug to upstream and it was fixed long time ago. Next stable release (0.4.0) of program will be soon. And I want

Bug#674291: RFS: olena/2.0-1 [ITP]

2012-05-24 Thread Guillaume Lazzara
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package olena * Package name: olena Version : 2.0-1 Upstream Author : Olena Team - EPITA Research and Development Laboratory (LRDE) ol...@lrde.epita.fr * URL

Re: Can I adopt removed package?

2012-05-24 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, Thank you for your comments. On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:33 PM, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: The library has already been removed from the archive, you will need to reintroduce it, meaning you need an ITP. The existing packaging can be found on snapshot.d.o:

Getting rid of control messages revisited

2012-05-24 Thread Arno Töll
Hello, some (most?) of us found the signal/noise ratio on the debian-mentors list significantly worse since we switched to a BTS based workflow. Having that said, I am sitting next to formorer, one of our list masters, on the LinuxTag right now and we ended up to discuss this problem again (c.f.

Re: d/copyright for mrtg-ping-probe (ITA)

2012-05-24 Thread Robert James Clay
Paul, On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Gevers wrote: The first thing I noticed when I was doing that is that while the original debian/copyright was for GPL-2+ for all files, the actual source COPYRIGHT file looks to be GPL-2 not GPL-2+. Please inspect the source files of the

Re: Getting rid of control messages revisited

2012-05-24 Thread Gergely Nagy
Arno Töll a...@debian.org writes: What about creating a list as owner of the pseudo-package dedicated to BTS traffic (including control messages) named sponsorship-requests@l.d.o. Furthermore, the mentors list should still get bug traffic (only). Therefore we would subscribe that list via PTS

Re: RFS: torrentflux-b4rt

2012-05-24 Thread Panayiotis Karabassis
On 10/07/2011 04:35 πμ, Michael Tautschnig wrote: Hi, [...] Here's a preliminary review of your package: - The source package contains several versions of other clients as archives in the clients/ directory. For one, this seems strange, as both other clients appear to be packaged in

Re: Getting rid of control messages revisited

2012-05-24 Thread David Bremner
Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu writes: That sounds like a good idea, though closing mails would be useful on -mentors@ too, not sure whether that counts as bug traffic or control. But that's just a nice to have thing, in my opinion, one can always manually subscribe to interesting RFS bugs

Bug#673600: RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1

2012-05-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com, 2012-05-23, 11:48: I think you need some extra code in postinst to deal with this transition. See 'Transition of Depends: update-inetd packages' section of DEP-9. I purposely haven't added postinst code because according to popcon [1], nobody has

Bug#674432: RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-3

2012-05-24 Thread Etienne Millon
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gmpc, version 11.8.16-3. I uploaded it on mentors.d.n. The details can be seen at the following URL : http://mentors.debian.net/package/gmpc Alternatively, one can download the package with

Bug#674432: marked as done (RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-3)

2012-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 May 2012 18:20:03 +0200 with message-id 4fbe5fb3@debian.org and subject line RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #674432, regarding RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#674445: RFS: ruby-juicer/1.0.16-1 (RFP: 641973)

2012-05-24 Thread Jean Parpaillon
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ruby-juicer * Package name: ruby-juicer Version : 1.0.16-1 Upstream Author : Christian Johansen * URL :

Re: RFS: torrentflux-b4rt

2012-05-24 Thread Panayiotis Karabassis
On 24/05/2012 05:27 μμ, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote: On 10/07/2011 04:35 πμ, Michael Tautschnig wrote: Hi, [...] Here's a preliminary review of your package: - The source package contains several versions of other clients as archives in the clients/ directory. For one, this seems

Re: Bug#672981: RFS: eiskaltdcpp/2.2.6-5 (updated) -- Direct Connect and Advanced Direct Connect client

2012-05-24 Thread Boris Pek
Hi, Week passed without any reply. And I am still looking for a sponsor for the package. Best regards, Boris 2012-05-15 11:29, Boris Pek wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my

Re: Bug#672981: RFS: eiskaltdcpp/2.2.6-5 (updated) -- Direct Connect and Advanced Direct Connect client

2012-05-24 Thread Bart Martens
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:25:22PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote: Hi, Week passed without any reply. And I am still looking for a sponsor for the package. Boris, No need to send reminders to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org . The package is still on these lists, so it won't be forgotten:

Re: Bug#672981: RFS: eiskaltdcpp/2.2.6-5 (updated) -- Direct Connect and Advanced Direct Connect client

2012-05-24 Thread Boris Pek
Hi, No need to send reminders to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org . The package is still on these lists, so it won't be forgotten Yes, but it can be there during months or years without any reply. There are no RC or important bugs in this package. And it could be hard to find the sponsor for

Bug#673345: Still in need of sponsor

2012-05-24 Thread Tobias Hansen
In #672142 Cyril Brulebois offered to review the package, but he just notified me that he won't get to it for another week or so. If someone else wants to review and possibly sponsor the package, that would be greatly appreciated. Best regards, Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#674477: RFS: frogatto{-data}/1.2+dfsg-1.1 [NMU] -- 2D platformer game starring a quixotic frog

2012-05-24 Thread Vincent Cheng
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my packages frogatto and frogatto-data. Maintainer is listed on the Low Threshold NMU wiki page, so I've taken the liberty of packaging a new upstream version, in addition to fixing a number of bugs and

Bug#674483: RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA] -- Web-oriented universal programming language

2012-05-24 Thread Gabriele Giacone
Package: sponsorship-requests Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package haxe. haxe has been removed one year ago due to FTBFS on kfreebsd still reproducible http://deb.li/3KVzx. This version builds fine. * Package name: haxe Version : 1:2.9+20120414-1 Upstream

Bug#673600: RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1

2012-05-24 Thread Jonathan McCrohan
[I've uploaded version 1.0+git20120523.99dc310-1 [1] to mentors.d.o] On 24/05/12 16:09, Jakub Wilk wrote: Well, I have it installed. Is that enough? :) Fair enough. This is fixed in 1.0+git20120523.99dc310-1. I'm confused. What NEWS page? A NEWS.Debian file. Section 6.3.4 of the Debian

Bug#666925: marked as done (RFS: mpdscribble/0.22-3 [ITA])

2012-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 05:05:50 + with message-id 20120525050550.ga18...@master.debian.org and subject line closing sponsorship-requests for packages uploaded to unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #666925, regarding RFS: mpdscribble/0.22-3 [ITA] to be marked as done. This

Processed: retitle sponsorship-requests

2012-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 673600 RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120523.99dc310-1 Bug #673600 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1 Changed Bug title to 'RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120523.99dc310-1' from 'RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1' retitle

Bug#671184: marked as done (RFS: usbmuxd/1.0.8-1 (new upstream release))

2012-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 05:25:40 + with message-id 20120525052540.ga30...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS: usbmuxd/1.0.8-1 (new upstream release) has caused the Debian Bug report #671184, regarding RFS: usbmuxd/1.0.8-1 (new upstream release) to be marked as done. This means