On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:27:58 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:58 AM, KURASHIKI Satoru wrote:
I want to adopt this package because I'm planning to ITP
the package (rt-extension-calendar) which depends on this
library.
Hi,
Two weeks passed without any reply.
And I am still looking for a sponsor for the package.
Current version (0.3.2-1) of package in Debian Sid is FTBFS on s390 and s390x.
I reported bug to upstream and it was fixed long time ago. Next stable release
(0.4.0) of program will be soon. And I want
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package olena
* Package name: olena
Version : 2.0-1
Upstream Author : Olena Team - EPITA Research and Development Laboratory
(LRDE) ol...@lrde.epita.fr
* URL
hi,
Thank you for your comments.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:33 PM, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote:
The library has already been removed from the archive, you will need
to reintroduce it, meaning you need an ITP.
The existing packaging can be found on snapshot.d.o:
Hello,
some (most?) of us found the signal/noise ratio on the debian-mentors
list significantly worse since we switched to a BTS based workflow.
Having that said, I am sitting next to formorer, one of our list
masters, on the LinuxTag right now and we ended up to discuss this
problem again (c.f.
Paul,
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Gevers wrote:
The first thing I noticed when I was doing that is that while the
original debian/copyright was for GPL-2+ for all files, the actual
source COPYRIGHT file looks to be GPL-2 not GPL-2+.
Please inspect the source files of the
Arno Töll a...@debian.org writes:
What about creating a list as owner of the pseudo-package dedicated to
BTS traffic (including control messages) named
sponsorship-requests@l.d.o. Furthermore, the mentors list should still
get bug traffic (only). Therefore we would subscribe that list via PTS
On 10/07/2011 04:35 πμ, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Here's a preliminary review of your package:
- The source package contains several versions of other clients as archives in
the clients/ directory. For one, this seems strange, as both other clients
appear to be packaged in
Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu writes:
That sounds like a good idea, though closing mails would be useful on
-mentors@ too, not sure whether that counts as bug traffic or
control. But that's just a nice to have thing, in my opinion, one can
always manually subscribe to interesting RFS bugs
* Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com, 2012-05-23, 11:48:
I think you need some extra code in postinst to deal with this
transition. See 'Transition of Depends: update-inetd packages'
section of DEP-9.
I purposely haven't added postinst code because according to popcon
[1], nobody has
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gmpc, version 11.8.16-3. I
uploaded it on mentors.d.n. The details can be seen at the following
URL :
http://mentors.debian.net/package/gmpc
Alternatively, one can download the package with
Your message dated Thu, 24 May 2012 18:20:03 +0200
with message-id 4fbe5fb3@debian.org
and subject line RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #674432,
regarding RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ruby-juicer
* Package name: ruby-juicer
Version : 1.0.16-1
Upstream Author : Christian Johansen
* URL :
On 24/05/2012 05:27 μμ, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
On 10/07/2011 04:35 πμ, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Here's a preliminary review of your package:
- The source package contains several versions of other clients as archives
in
the clients/ directory. For one, this seems
Hi,
Week passed without any reply.
And I am still looking for a sponsor for the package.
Best regards,
Boris
2012-05-15 11:29, Boris Pek wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:25:22PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
Hi,
Week passed without any reply.
And I am still looking for a sponsor for the package.
Boris,
No need to send reminders to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org . The package is
still on these lists, so it won't be forgotten:
Hi,
No need to send reminders to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org . The package is
still on these lists, so it won't be forgotten
Yes, but it can be there during months or years without any reply. There are no
RC or important bugs in this package. And it could be hard to find the sponsor
for
In #672142 Cyril Brulebois offered to review the package, but he just
notified me that he won't get to it for another week or so. If someone
else wants to review and possibly sponsor the package, that would be
greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Tobias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages frogatto and
frogatto-data. Maintainer is listed on the Low Threshold NMU wiki
page, so I've taken the liberty of packaging a new upstream version,
in addition to fixing a number of bugs and
Package: sponsorship-requests
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package haxe.
haxe has been removed one year ago due to FTBFS on kfreebsd still
reproducible http://deb.li/3KVzx. This version builds fine.
* Package name: haxe
Version : 1:2.9+20120414-1
Upstream
[I've uploaded version 1.0+git20120523.99dc310-1 [1] to mentors.d.o]
On 24/05/12 16:09, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Well, I have it installed. Is that enough? :)
Fair enough. This is fixed in 1.0+git20120523.99dc310-1.
I'm confused. What NEWS page?
A NEWS.Debian file. Section 6.3.4 of the Debian
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 05:05:50 +
with message-id 20120525050550.ga18...@master.debian.org
and subject line closing sponsorship-requests for packages uploaded to unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #666925,
regarding RFS: mpdscribble/0.22-3 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 673600 RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120523.99dc310-1
Bug #673600 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120523.99dc310-1' from 'RFS:
nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1'
retitle
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 05:25:40 +
with message-id 20120525052540.ga30...@master.debian.org
and subject line RFS: usbmuxd/1.0.8-1 (new upstream release)
has caused the Debian Bug report #671184,
regarding RFS: usbmuxd/1.0.8-1 (new upstream release)
to be marked as done.
This means
24 matches
Mail list logo
