Bug#672981: RFS: eiskaltdcpp/2.2.7-1 (updated) -- Direct Connect and Advanced Direct Connect client

2012-05-30 Thread Boris Pek
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eiskaltdcpp/eiskaltdcpp_2.2.7-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian

Processed: your mail

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 665354 RFS: viennacl/1.3.0-1 Bug #665354 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: viennacl/1.2.1-1 Changed Bug title to 'RFS: viennacl/1.3.0-1' from 'RFS: viennacl/1.2.1-1' > summary 665354 0 Bug #665354 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: viennacl/1.3.0-1 Sum

RFS: l2tp-ipsec-vpn-daemon (updated package)

2012-05-30 Thread Werner Jaeger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, My sponsor is kil...@debian.org. I just uploaded the new version 0.9.9-1 of my package "l2tp-ipsec-vpn-daemon". This upload contains changes to make the daemon binary compatible over various linux distributions. * Package name:

RFS: l2tp-ipsec-vpn (updated package)

2012-05-30 Thread Werner Jaeger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, My sponsor is kil...@debian.org. I just uploaded the new version 1.0.7-1 of my package "l2tp-ipsec-vpn". This upload contains changes to make the application binary compatible over various linux distributions and would fix several bug

Bug#673096: Bug#674850: RM: figlet -- RoQA; license which "specifically excludes the right to re-distribute"

2012-05-30 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
clone 674850 -1 clone 674850 -2 retitle -1 "Please remove figlet 2.2.2-1 from stable" retitle -2 "Please remove all versions of src:figlet from snapshots.d.o" reassing -1 release.debian.org reassing -2 snapshot.debian.org thanks Hi! * Bart Martens [120528 10:58]: > Please remove figlet 2.2.2-1

Bug#670212: RFS: pentobi/1.2-1

2012-05-30 Thread Dean Evans
On Sat, 26 May 2012 13:57:20 + Bart Martens wrote: > Hi Dean, > > Why not pentobi 2.0 ? > http://sourceforge.net/projects/pentobi/files/ > > Regards, > > Bart Martens Hi Bart, Thank you for uploading auralquiz. I missed the recent release of 2.0 final, I will package that up this week a

Bug#673096: RFS: figlet/2.2.4-1

2012-05-30 Thread Jakub Wilk
I'm no longer interested in sponsoring this package. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120530112155.ga9...@jwilk.net

Re: hardening with non-C compilers

2012-05-30 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 27.05.2012 15:19, Paul Gevers wrote: > Can somebody point me at relevant information about hardening of non-c > based compilers (in Debian). I have read > http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening but as far as I can see it assumes C. > Something specifically about FPC/Lazarus would be even better o

Bug#665354: RFS: viennacl/1.3.0-1

2012-05-30 Thread Michael Wild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "viennacl" * Package name: viennacl Version : 1.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Karl Rupp * URL : http://viennacl.sf.net *

Processed: your mail

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > summary 665354 44 Bug #665354 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: viennacl/1.3.0-1 Ignoring request to change the summary of bug 665354 to the same value > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 665354: http://bugs

Processed: your mail

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > summary 665354 Bug #665354 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: viennacl/1.3.0-1 Removed summary > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 665354: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665354 Debian Bug Tr

Bug#675225: RFS: drupal6/6.26-1.1 [RC]

2012-05-30 Thread Raúl Benencia
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "drupal6" * Package name: drupal6 Version : 6.26-1.1 * URL : https://drupal.org/ * License : gpl-2 Section : web It builds those binary pack

Bug#675226: RFS: rsskit/0.3-1 [ITP]

2012-05-30 Thread Yavor Doganov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rsskit" * Package name: rsskit Version : 0.3-1 Upstream Author : Günther Noack * URL : http://gap.nongnu.org/grr/ * License : LGPL-2.1 Section

Bug#675230: RFS: zeroc-icee/1.2.0-6.1 [RC]

2012-05-30 Thread Raúl Benencia
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeroc-icee" * Package name: zeroc-icee Version : 1.2.0-6.1 * URL : http://www.zeroc.com/ * License : gpl-2 Section : libs It builds those b

Bug#659947: Bug #659947: RFS: portabase/2.0+git20110117-1 [ITP] -- Easy-to-use personal database application

2012-05-30 Thread Aron Xu
Hi, The packaging of this package is almost fine, but there is a problem in DEP5 copyright file: W: portabase source: syntax-error-in-dep5-copyright line 8: Duplicate field copyright. Please fix this warning, thanks! -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@li

Bug#675251: RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-3 [ITA]

2012-05-30 Thread William Dauchy
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ebtables" * Package name: ebtables Version : 2.0.10.4-3 Upstream Author : Bart De Schuymer , Nick Fedchik , Grzegorz Borowiak * URL : http://ebtables.sourceforge.n

Bug#673096: Bug#674850: RM: figlet -- RoQA; license which "specifically excludes the right to re-distribute"

2012-05-30 Thread Julien Cristau
tag 675167 moreinfo kthxbye On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:58:07 +, Bart Martens wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: normal > > Please remove figlet 2.2.2-1 from unstable, testing, stable and oldstable. > > The package contains material that must not be distributed. One example is > t

Hassles when using git-buildpackage

2012-05-30 Thread Christian Welzel
Hi there, i have a problem with git and git-buildpackage that i cannot solve in a "git" way. I would appreciate any hints on this issue. My situation: I use git-buildpackage to handle my packages. I'm following the suggested setup with master, upstream and pristine-tar branch. This works fine most

architechture specific depency 's

2012-05-30 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
Is it posebol to specify a depency voor a specific architechture ? For example I want voor hppa and powerpcspe that debhelper (= 9.20120513) is and all other debhelper => 8 With kind regards, Bas van den Dikkenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#659947: Bug #659947: RFS: portabase/2.0+git20110117-1 [ITP] -- Easy-to-use personal database application

2012-05-30 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
This is fixed, thank you very much. > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/portabase/portabase_2.0+git20110117-1.dsc Cheers, Dmitry. On 31/05/12 04:01, Aron Xu wrote: > Hi, > > The packaging of this package is almost fine, but there is a problem > in DEP5 copyright file: > > W: portab

Re: Hassles when using git-buildpackage

2012-05-30 Thread Russell Sim
Christian Welzel writes: > My situation: > I use git-buildpackage to handle my packages. I'm following the > suggested setup with master, upstream and pristine-tar branch. > This works fine most the time, but now i'm a bit stuck. > The current upstream version C is in master and upstream. Some >

Re: architechture specific depency 's

2012-05-30 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: > Is it posebol to specify  a depency voor a specific architechture ? http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-depsyntax > For example I want voor hppa and powerpcspe that debhelper (= 9.20120513) is > and all

Processed: retitle to RFS: uhub/0.4.0-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 672290 RFS: uhub/0.4.0-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced > Direct Connect p2p hub Bug #672290 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: uhub/0.4.0~git20120423-9efe4bc-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub Changed Bug t

Bug#672899: marked as done (RFS: foremost/1.5.7-2 [ITA])

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 04:14:14 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: foremost/1.5.7-2 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #672899, regarding RFS: foremost/1.5.7-2 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#674961: marked as done (RFS: roxterm/2.6.4-1)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 04:14:14 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: roxterm/2.6.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #674961, regarding RFS: roxterm/2.6.4-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#675225: marked as done (RFS: drupal6/6.26-1.1 [RC])

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 04:14:14 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: drupal6/6.26-1.1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #675225, regarding RFS: drupal6/6.26-1.1 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#674717: Bug#674684: About your qpdfview package on mentors.d.n

2012-05-30 Thread Aron Xu
Hi Benjamin, I can upload it if it's all okay but now I have more concerns regarding the license issue. qpdfview needs libpoppler, which is licensed under GPL-2 only, but qpdfview is GPL-3. The two license are not compatible. Would it be possible to ask upstream to re-license the software and rel

Bug#659947: marked as done (RFS: portabase/2.0+git20110117-1 [ITP] -- Easy-to-use personal database application)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 14:54:45 +0800 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug #659947: RFS: portabase/2.0+git20110117-1 [ITP] -- Easy-to-use personal database application has caused the Debian Bug report #659947, regarding RFS: portabase/2.0+git20110117-1 [ITP] -- Easy-to-use perso