Hi Bob,
The previous package maintainers are also copyright holders of debian/* so
debian/copyright needs an update for that. Please talk to the previous
maintainers if there is doubt on the license(s) for debian/*.
The package uses source format "3.0 (quilt)" but does not really use quilt, so
d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 674483 -1
Bug #674483 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: haxe and neko [ITA]
Bug 674483 cloned as bug 678480
> retitle 674483 RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA]
Bug #674483 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: haxe and neko [ITA]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ha
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bdsup2sub++".
Package: BDSup2Sub++
Version: 1.0.0-1
Upstream author: Adam Thomas-Murphy
Source URL: https://github.com/amichaelt/BDSup2SubPlusPlus
License: Apache Public License version 2
Sec
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 673457 RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files
> for Psi+
Bug #673457 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5333.2-1 [ITP] --
translation files for Psi+
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1
retitle 673457 RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for
Psi+
thanks
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psi-plus-i18n/psi-plus-i18n_0.15.5338.4-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-men
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sgml-data".
It builds binary package:
sgml-data - common SGML and XML data
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/sg
Hi Jeroen,
thanks for adopting wmctrl! I would sponsor your package, but please
fix the following small issues first:
- use the current homepage in debian/watch
- remove 03_makefile_prelibs.patch (it is not in debian/patches/series
and does not work because either Makefile.in need to be pat
Hi,
I have uploaded a new version of the dhelp package to also address bug
#678055, which showed up shortly after my initial RFS.
In case someone is reviewing the previous version of the package, the
changes are located in only one file: src/dhelp_parse.rb (and also
debian/changelog, of course).
Dear mentors,
that is my second try searching for a sponsor my package.
the old maintainer allowed an NMU, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653539#15
and after some mails in the last two weeks he allowed me to adopt
his package because of lacking in time.
So I am looking f
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:12:40AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Have you forwarded these patches upstream?
I planned to forward them as soon as the package was accepted into Debian,
but as it’s apparently going to take very long I have done it yesterday.
> You changed priority from extra to option
The latest 'time' package release candidate is here:
http://www.proulx.com/~bob/debian/pool/sid/main/time/2012-06-21/
-rw-r--r-- 1 16649 Jun 21 13:38 time_1.7-24.debian.tar.gz
-rw-rw-r-- 1 1038 Jun 21 13:48 time_1.7-24.dsc
-rw-r--r-- 1 12317 Jun 21 13:39 time_1.7-24_amd64.build
-rw-
Hi Malcolm,
http://mentors.debian.net/package/chordii
Uploaded: 2012-02-25 23:28
The file /usr/share/doc/chordii/changelog.gz is no longer installed, and that
is not mentioned in debian/changelog.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.or
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:14:22 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: qmpdclient/1.2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #678214,
regarding RFS: qmpdclient/1.2.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 675532 RFS: bilibop/0.3.2 (ITP #675467)
Bug #675532 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: bilibop/0.3.1 (ITP #675467)
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: bilibop/0.3.2 (ITP #675467)' from 'RFS:
bilibop/0.3.1 (ITP #675467)'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
On 06/08/2012 06:00 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Guillaume Lazzara
> wrote:
>
> Anyway why is the package on mentors so damn huge !
>
> $ dget -u http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/olena/olena_2.0-1.dsc
> $ wget http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/olena/2.0/
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwarftherapist"
* Package name: dwarftherapist
Version : 0.6.12+hg20120621-1
Upstream Author : Justin Ehlert
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/dwarfthera
On 06/21/2012 06:16 AM, bilibop project wrote:
> I intent to set up a Git repository for my project. A source package is
> already
> available (see http://mentors.debian.net/package/bilibop). Now, at least five
> successive versions have been uploaded on mentors.debian.net.
>
> So, my question ab
Hi,
Le 2012-06-17 19:42, intrigeri a écrit :
Hopefully, I'll review this before the end of the month.
Other potential sponsors: if you can be faster than me, please do.
There is a new version (after tests on freshly installed systems):
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bilibop/bilib
Hi,
I intent to set up a Git repository for my project. A source package is already
available (see http://mentors.debian.net/package/bilibop). Now, at least five
successive versions have been uploaded on mentors.debian.net.
So, my question about Git is: should I start it from the initial release,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-qa mailing list)
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libvisual".
It builds those binary packages:
libvisual-0.4-0 - Audio visualization framework
libvisual-0.4-0-i18n - Audio vi
Processed moment ago. Thanks.
2012-06-21 09:51, Boris Pek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago
> via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for
> uploads (tested using dput).
>
> Best regards,
> Boris
--
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Boris Pek wrote:
> Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago
> via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for
> uploads (tested using dput).
The importer was down, I've restarted it and it is pro
On 2012-06-21 09:37, Olе Streicher wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I just re-inserted a package that was removed from Debian a year ago
> (saods9), and following some recommendations, I exhumated the old bugs
> and set them to "fixed" in the new version.
>
> Shall I archive them now again manually? Or is t
Hi list,
I just re-inserted a package that was removed from Debian a year ago
(saods9), and following some recommendations, I exhumated the old bugs
and set them to "fixed" in the new version.
Shall I archive them now again manually? Or is this done somehow
automatically? What is this "archived"
24 matches
Mail list logo
