Processed: bzr-email: block ITA 668266 by RFS 679344

2012-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 668266 by 679344 Bug #668266 [wnpp] ITA: bzr-email -- Notification email plugin for Bazaar 668266 was not blocked by any bugs. 668266 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 668266: 679344 stop Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: retitle to RFS: taskcoach/1.3.16-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager

2012-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 663431 RFS: taskcoach/1.3.16-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager Bug #663431 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: taskcoach/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- friendly task manager Changed Bug title to 'RFS: taskcoach/1.3.16-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager' from

Processed: qemplayer: block ITP 679336 by RFS 679342

2012-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 679336 by 679342 Bug #679336 [wnpp] ITP: qemplayer -- File-manager-like GUI front-end to MPlayer 679336 was not blocked by any bugs. 679336 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 679336: 679342 stop Stopping processing here.

Bug#679201: marked as done (RFS: mysqltuner/1.2.0-1 [ITA])

2012-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:14:02 + with message-id e1sk7zo-0001y9...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: mysqltuner/1.2.0-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #679201, regarding RFS: mysqltuner/1.2.0-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#678914: marked as done (RFS: fuse-convmvfs/0.2.6-2)

2012-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:14:00 + with message-id e1sk7zm-0001xw...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: fuse-convmvfs/0.2.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #678914, regarding RFS: fuse-convmvfs/0.2.6-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#670334: RFS for package in NEW

2012-06-28 Thread Bart Martens
Hello, I see that this package is in NEW. http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html Does this mean that this RFS can be closed now ? Or is this RFS meant to replace the package in NEW ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread Benoît Knecht
José Luis Segura Lucas wrote: El 27/06/12 12:48, Benoît Knecht escribió: I just meant that you should use something like opts=dversionmangle (see uscan(1)) so that uscan would remove the +20120619git27g55c0f4e part before comparing the debian version with the upstream one. But if you're

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
Hi! I had contacted upstream author and I get a good response from him: 1.- I can remove Matchman Green from the copyright file. 2.- I added libcppunit-dev as build-depend and the test suite is built now, but never executed. As we suspect, make test doesn't work. Which rule on debian/rules must

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
El 28/06/12 09:12, Benoît Knecht escribió: Actually, Boris' suggestion (cherry-picking the changes you need and including them as patches) is even better, you should consider doing that and dropping the +20120619git27g55c0f4e entirely. Ok, I just seen it. I will make the changes ASAP before

Bug#670334: RFS for package in NEW

2012-06-28 Thread Philipp Hartwig
Hi, I see that this package is in NEW. http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html Does this mean that this RFS can be closed now ? Or is this RFS meant to replace the package in NEW ? it can be closed, thank you. Regards, Philipp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#674483: RFS: haxe and neko [ITA] (Was: Re: Bug#674483: RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA] -- Web-oriented universal programming language)

2012-06-28 Thread Gabriele Giacone
Please upload haxe and neko for me before the freeze. I'm trying to adopt them just because haxe is needed by gnash testsuite and I'd like bringing it back in stable. Swftools has been reintroduced few months ago, haxe would be the only missing test tool. If I won't find any sponsor, I'll

Bug#676646: marked as done (RFS: sblim-wbemcli/1.6.2-7 [ITP #675232] through the BTS this time)

2012-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:10:21 +0200 with message-id 87r4szeohe@szonett.ki.iif.hu and subject line already in NEW, closing has caused the Debian Bug report #676646, regarding RFS: sblim-wbemcli/1.6.2-7 [ITP #675232] through the BTS this time to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#677239: RFS: fractalnow [ITP #673395] -- Fast, advanced fractal generator

2012-06-28 Thread pe . marc
Hi, Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org wrote: Please provide a direct link to the .dsc file, so that it can be easily downloaded with dget. The best way to do this is uploading your package to mentors [1], following these instructions [2]. [1] http://mentors.debian.net [2]

How to rebuild binary package to fix bugs?

2012-06-28 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, I've explored RC bugs list, and consider helping to close this: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=nobug=668209 It seems that videolan binary package depends on old (build-time) xulrunner, and needs to be recompiled against current xulrunner. So, there is no need to touch

Re: How to rebuild binary package to fix bugs?

2012-06-28 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Satoru KURASHIKI lur...@gmail.com wrote: hi, I've explored RC bugs list, and consider helping to close this: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=nobug=668209 It seems that videolan binary package depends on old (build-time) xulrunner, and

Bug#677019: RFS: chordii

2012-06-28 Thread Malcolm Locke
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:44:19PM +, Bart Martens wrote: Hi Malcolm, http://mentors.debian.net/package/chordii Uploaded: 2012-02-25 23:28 The file /usr/share/doc/chordii/changelog.gz is no longer installed, and that is not mentioned in debian/changelog. Thanks Bart, New version

Re: How to rebuild binary package to fix bugs?

2012-06-28 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, letting alone the problem beyond, as I am not qualified to comment on that: On 28.06.2012 13:13, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote: In such case, what do I prepare for NMU patch? Or, are there another option to rebuild package on the archive? you do not need to prepare binNMU patch. A binNMU is

Bug#679402: RFS: mysql-tzdata/1.0

2012-06-28 Thread Steven Ayre
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mysql-tzdata Package name: mysql-tzdata Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Steven Ayre stevea...@gmail.com URL : https://github.com/SteveAyre/mysql-cluster-7.2 License

Bug#678594: RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 [ITA] [RC] (second try: documented upstream repackaging and updated man file)

2012-06-28 Thread david . sephirot
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package driftnet Package name : driftnet Version: 0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 Upstream Author : Chris Lightfoot ch...@ex-parrot.com URL : http://www.ex-parrot.com/~chris/driftnet/ License

Bug#678594: RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 [ITA] [RC] (second try: documented upstream repackaging and updated man file)

2012-06-28 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi David, On 2012-06-28 14:43, david.sephi...@gmail.com wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package driftnet [...] * Imported Upstream version 0.1.6+cvs20040426 * New maintainer (closes: #616451) * Fix memstr() implementation non-working on 64bit systems

Bug#679420: RFS: pdfposter/0.5.0-1

2012-06-28 Thread Elena Grandi
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, Since the sponsor of my other package seems to be busy, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pdfposter This upload adopts the package, updates it to the latest upstream release and to current packaging practices and closes 3

Bug#670334: marked as done (RFS: notion/3+2012042300-1 [ITP] -- Notion tiling tabbed window manager)

2012-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:35:24 + with message-id 20120628153524.ga14...@master.debian.org and subject line closing as confirmed by Philipp [p...@phhart.de: Re: Bug#670334: RFS for package in NEW] has caused the Debian Bug report #670334, regarding RFS: notion/3+2012042300-1

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
El 28/06/12 09:16, José Luis Segura Lucas escribió: I have only a questions before uploading the package again to mentors.debian.net: which rule I must override on debian/rules to execute the unit tests? Best regards I can answer myself: overriding the rule dh_auto_test. I had worked into

Processed: retitle to RFS: grive/0.1.1-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 678992 RFS: grive/0.1.1-1 [ITP #675310] Bug #678992 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: grive/0.1.1-1 [ITP #675310]' from 'RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP

Re: Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread Andreas Rütten
Am Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:57:30 +0200 schrieb José Luis Segura Lucas josel.seg...@gmx.es: [...] P.S. After uploading to mentors.debian.net I have seen a lintian informational warning (missing headers on the quilt patches). I describe it in a few words, but after a debuild -S -sd I tried dput

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

2012-06-28 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
Hi, I'm sending this on to the pkg-bazaar list. Would you be interested in maintaining this as part of that team? -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething Debian Maintainer http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a.starr.b%40gmail.com PGP/GPG

Bug#677491: RFS: narval

2012-06-28 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Xavier, There is no package at mentors. What happened ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#679439: RFS: lightspeed/1.2a-9 [QA] -- Shows how objects moving at relativistic speeds look like

2012-06-28 Thread Boris Pek
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the package lightspeed. It builds binary package: lightspeed - Shows how objects moving at relativistic speeds look like To access further information about this

Bug#677491: Fwd: Re: RFS: narval

2012-06-28 Thread xavier grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 forgot to replay all, sorry - Message original Sujet: Re: RFS: narval Date : Thu, 28 Jun 2012 22:05:35 +0200 De : xavier grave xavier.gr...@ipno.in2p3.fr Répondre à : xavier.gr...@ipno.in2p3.fr Pour : Bart Martens ba...@debian.org

Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP]

2012-06-28 Thread Alexander Inyukhin
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package task-spooler * Package name: task-spooler Version : 0.7.3-1 Upstream Author : Lluís Batlle i Rossel vi...@vicerveza.homeunix.net * URL : http://vicerveza.homeunix.net/~viric/soft/ts/ * License :

Bug#679402: mysql-tzdata

2012-06-28 Thread Nicholas Bamber
Steven, First a question. How does this relate to the 'mysql_tzinfo_to_sql' tool that comes with mysql-5.5 (and presumably MySQL cluster as well)? Secondly this would be quite a small package. We have never had a definitive answer from the FTP masters, on when they reject packages

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread Benoît Knecht
José Luis Segura Lucas wrote: El 28/06/12 09:16, José Luis Segura Lucas escribió: I have only a questions before uploading the package again to mentors.debian.net: which rule I must override on debian/rules to execute the unit tests? Best regards I can answer myself: overriding the

Bug#678594: RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 [ITA] [RC] (second try: documented upstream repackaging and updated man file)

2012-06-28 Thread david . sephirot
Hi Eugene. Your changes look fine as for me (module corrections above, s/hidding/hiding/, s/especified/specified/, s/non-working/to work/). Sorry, Im not English native. Two questions: 1) Where is the Git repository which is mentioned a couple of times in your packaging? You probably

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

2012-06-28 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a.star...@gmail.com wrote: I'm sending this on to the pkg-bazaar list. Would you be interested in maintaining this as part of that team? Does the team needs some help? Though I'm not a skilled python developer, bzr packaging is

Re: Bug#679045: RFS: xmhtml/1.1.7-18 [QA] -- Motif widget for display HTML 3.2

2012-06-28 Thread Nicholas Breen
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:39:30AM +0300, Boris Pek wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the package xmhtml. It builds those binary packages: xmhtml1 - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (library) xmhtml1-dev - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (development files) To access further

Bug#678368: marked as done (RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework)

2012-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:58:13 -0700 with message-id 20120629025813.gj6...@ofb.net and subject line Re: Bug#678368: RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework has caused the Debian Bug report #678368, regarding RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization

Bug#677019: marked as done (RFS: chordii/4.3+repack-2 [ITA] -- Text file (chordpro format) to music sheet converter)

2012-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 04:20:03 + with message-id e1sksgd-0004pr...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: chordii/4.3+repack-2 [ITA] -- Text file (chordpro format) to music sheet converter has caused the Debian Bug report #677019, regarding RFS: chordii/4.3+repack-2

Bug#678935: marked as done (RFS: coinor-ipopt/3.10.2-1.1 [NMU] [RC])

2012-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 04:20:03 + with message-id e1sksgd-0004po...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: coinor-ipopt/3.10.2-1.1 [NMU] [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #678935, regarding RFS: coinor-ipopt/3.10.2-1.1 [NMU] [RC] to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#667617: marked as done (RFS: postgres-xc/1.0beta1-1 [NEW] -- Write-scalable, synchronous multi-master, transparent PostgreSQL)

2012-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 05:40:34 + with message-id 20120629054033.gc26...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS: postgres-xc has caused the Debian Bug report #667617, regarding RFS: postgres-xc/1.0beta1-1 [NEW] -- Write-scalable, synchronous multi-master, transparent PostgreSQL

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-06-28 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
El 28/06/12 23:47, Benoît Knecht escribió: The idea was to pick only the specific diffs that solved issues, rather that including all the changes up to that git revision. Yes, it was my first idea too, but I tried to only retrieve the Cmake-stuff, the newer MD5 implementation (without linking