Bug#678368: marked as done (RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework)

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2012 04:20:28 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework has caused the Debian Bug report #678368, regarding RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#679512: marked as done (RFS: yorick-mpeg/0.1-2 [Release goal: hardening])

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2012 03:05:25 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: yorick-mpeg/0.1-2 [Release goal: hardening] has caused the Debian Bug report #679512, regarding RFS: yorick-mpeg/0.1-2 [Release goal: hardening] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#679509: marked as done (RFS: yorick-av/0.0.1-2 [Release goal: hardening])

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2012 03:05:25 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: yorick-av/0.0.1-2 [Release goal: hardening] has caused the Debian Bug report #679509, regarding RFS: yorick-av/0.0.1-2 [Release goal: hardening] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Processed: retitle to RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.6-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 673457 RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.6-1 [ITP] -- translation files > for Psi+ Bug #673457 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+ Changed Bug title to 'RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.6-1

Bug#678803: marked as done (RFS: sgml-data/2.0.8 [QA] -- common SGML and XML data)

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:48:50 -0700 with message-id <20120630014850.gh5...@ofb.net> and subject line Uploads: libcdaudio, sgml-data, roxterm has caused the Debian Bug report #678803, regarding RFS: sgml-data/2.0.8 [QA] -- common SGML and XML data to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#678581: marked as done (RFS: libcdaudio/0.99.12p2-12 [QA] -- library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs)

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:48:50 -0700 with message-id <20120630014850.gh5...@ofb.net> and subject line Uploads: libcdaudio, sgml-data, roxterm has caused the Debian Bug report #678581, regarding RFS: libcdaudio/0.99.12p2-12 [QA] -- library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio C

Bug#678552: marked as done (RFS: roxterm/2.6.5-1)

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:48:50 -0700 with message-id <20120630014850.gh5...@ofb.net> and subject line Uploads: libcdaudio, sgml-data, roxterm has caused the Debian Bug report #678552, regarding RFS: roxterm/2.6.5-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#679594: RFS: zgv/5.9-5 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer

2012-06-29 Thread Boris Pek
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "zgv". It builds binary package: zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://men

Bug#679045: marked as done (RFS: xmhtml/1.1.7-18 [QA] -- Motif widget for display HTML 3.2)

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:58:37 -0700 with message-id <20120629225837.ge5...@ofb.net> and subject line Re: Bug#679045: RFS: xmhtml/1.1.7-18 [QA] -- Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #679045, regarding RFS: xmhtml/1.1.7-18 [QA] -- Motif widget for displ

Processed: Reopen Bug#678368: RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 678368 ! Bug #678368 {Done: Nicholas Breen } [sponsorship-requests] RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework Bug reopened Ignoring request to change the submitter of bug#678368 to the same value Ignoring request to alte

Re: Who maintains manpages.debian.net?

2012-06-29 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 29.06.2012 23:01, Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote: > today I had a look at a section 3 manpage for unstable. I was > offered an outdated version. Where is "the right place to complain" - > to suggest importing an up to date version? you could ask Javier, the maintainer [1] (CC:ed). Granted h

Bug#672701: marked as done (RFS: clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP])

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:04:50 -0400 with message-id <20120629210450.GA8500@chayot> and subject line uploaded has caused the Debian Bug report #672701, regarding RFS: clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#679578: RFS: awffull/3.10.2-2 [QA] -- web server log analysis program

2012-06-29 Thread Boris Pek
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "awffull". It builds binary package: awffull - web server log analysis program To access further information about this package, please visit the following U

Who maintains manpages.debian.net?

2012-06-29 Thread Martin Eberhard Schauer
Hi, today I had a look at a section 3 manpage for unstable. I was offered an outdated version. Where is "the right place to complain" - to suggest importing an up to date version? Cheers, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscri

Bug#672237: marked as done (RFS: vim-vimerl/1.4.1+git20120509.89111c7-2 [ITP])

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 21:01:11 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: vim-vimerl/1.4.1+git20120509.89111c7-2 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #672237, regarding RFS: vim-vimerl/1.4.1+git20120509.89111c7-2 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#677067: marked as done (RFS: cairosvg/0.4.3-1 [ITP])

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 21:01:13 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: cairosvg/0.4.3-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #677067, regarding RFS: cairosvg/0.4.3-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: retitle to RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.5-2 [ITP]

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 676608 RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.5-2 [ITP] Bug #676608 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.5-1 [ITP] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.5-2 [ITP]' from 'RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.5-1 [ITP]' > stop Stopping processing here.

Bug#678368: RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework

2012-06-29 Thread Boris Pek
2012-06-29 05:58, Nicholas Breen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:00:06PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote: > >> Unnecessary package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n was deleted. >> >> Now there are only such changes: >> >> libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low > > Uploaded. Thank you for the QA work. Hi, T

Bug#678594: marked as done (RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-2 [ITA])

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 21:57:24 +0300 with message-id <20120629185724.GH6941@r500-debian> and subject line Re: Bug#678594: RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 [ITA] [RC] (second try: documented upstream repackaging and updated man file) has caused the Debian Bug report #678594, regardin

Processed: block 678860 with 679553

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 678860 with 679553 Bug #678860 [wnpp] ITA: uvccapture -- USB UVC Video Class snapshot software 678860 was not blocked by any bugs. 678860 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 678860: 679553 > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#679553: RFS: uvccapture/0.5-2 [ITA] -- USB UVC Video Class snapshot software

2012-06-29 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi mentors, I decided to adopt the recently orphaned package uvccapture, and I'm looking for a sponsor. This upload is mainly house keeping: taking over maintainer-ship, moving to dh, DEP-5, ect... Here's the full changelog: uvccapture (0.5-2) unsta

Bug#678594: RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 [ITA] [RC] (second try: documented upstream repackaging and updated man file)

2012-06-29 Thread david . sephirot
Hi, >Since you uploaded -2 already, I now want -3. Leave your original -1 >changes (only apply grammar fixes to them) under "-1", make new "-3" >changelog entry, and document all your changes which you made after my >review in it (probably it'd nice to mention that you applied some fixes >to the

Processed: retitle to RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-2 [ITA]

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 678594 RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-2 [ITA] Bug #678594 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 [ITA] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-2 [ITA]' from 'RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 [ITA]' > stop

Bug#678594: RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 [ITA] [RC] (second try: documented upstream repackaging and updated man file)

2012-06-29 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
On 2012-06-29 16:11, david.sephi...@gmail.com wrote: > And whats for the -2 entry ? Since there is nothing to put into, just don't add it. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++ GNU/Linux developer, Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mento

Bug#678594: RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 [ITA] [RC] (second try: documented upstream repackaging and updated man file)

2012-06-29 Thread david . sephirot
Hi, > Secondly, Vcs-* should point to your packaging (Git, as I understood) > repository, not upstream. Or is your packaging repository not public? > Then don't add any Vcs-* fields for now. At the moment is not hosted nor public. When I will fork upstream I publish it in allioth or github, prob

Bug#678594: RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 [ITA] [RC] (second try: documented upstream repackaging and updated man file)

2012-06-29 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi, On 2012-06-29 14:24, david.sephi...@gmail.com wrote: > > Good. Another point which I now noticed is that you want to lowercase > > the short description: s/Picks out/picks out/. So, please fix that, add > > Vcs-* headers, fix changelog corrections above and I'll upload the > > package. > > OK

Bug#678552: RFS: roxterm/2.6.5-1

2012-06-29 Thread Tony Houghton
Pinging this. I guess it may already be too late to avoid some of the extra work needed to get it into testing after the freeze though :-(. On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:59:27 +0100 Tony Houghton wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponso

Bug#678594: RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 [ITA] [RC] (second try: documented upstream repackaging and updated man file)

2012-06-29 Thread david . sephirot
Hi eugene, > Good. Another point which I now noticed is that you want to lowercase > the short description: s/Picks out/picks out/. So, please fix that, add > Vcs-* headers, fix changelog corrections above and I'll upload the > package. OK, thanks for point out the typos :) driftnet/0.1.6+cvs200

Bug#661309: marked as done (RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP])

2012-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:00:03 -0300 with message-id <87k3yqz5to.fsf@zancas.localnet> and subject line uploaded has caused the Debian Bug report #661309, regarding RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP]

2012-06-29 Thread David Bremner
Alexander Inyukhin writes: > > Changes from previous package version: > * priority changed to optional; > * fixed memory leak (cppcheck warning). Sounds good, I'll have a (hopefully final) look at this today. d -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Bug#679045: RFS: xmhtml/1.1.7-18 [QA] -- Motif widget for display HTML 3.2

2012-06-29 Thread Boris Pek
Hi, > % debdiff xmhtml1_1.1.7-17_amd64.deb xmhtml1_1.1.7-18_amd64.deb > [The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have > different names, permissions or owners.] > > Files in first .deb but not in second > - > -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr

Bug#679512: RFS: yorick-mpeg/0.1-2 [Release goal: hardening]

2012-06-29 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yorick-mpeg". This upload fixes issues with the hardening flags, a Wheezy release goal (in addition to complying with the debian-science policy). * Package name: yorick-mpeg Versio

Bug#679509: RFS: yorick-av/0.0.1-2 [Release goal: hardening]

2012-06-29 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yorick-av". This upload fixes issues with the hardening flags, a Wheezy release goal: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags In addition, this upload puts yorick-av

Bug#678594: RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 [ITA] [RC] (second try: documented upstream repackaging and updated man file)

2012-06-29 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi David, On 2012-06-29 01:01, david.sephi...@gmail.com wrote: > Sorry, Im not English native. No big problem, neither am I. [...] > My intention is take over the development of driftnet but I tried to contact > Chris Lightfoot, the upstream author, and I notice that he dead some years > ago.