Hi Michael,
About your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-03 08:00. You wrote
this in debian/copyright :
| Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/viennacl/files/
| The repacked source as used in the upload of this package was obtained by
| using git-import-orig(1) as follow
There is a new upstream version. The updated package can be found at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/allegro5/allegro5_5.0.7-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archi
Change to use default jdk and jre as requested by Ubuntu (Closes:
#683541)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/501d3e7b.9040...@comcast.net
Gentle reminder of this request.
I am looking for a sponsor for a new version of Jampal. The previous
sponsor of Jampal was Kilian Krause
* Package name: jampal
Version : 02.01.06+dfsg1-1
Upstream Author : Peter Bennett
* URL : http://jampal.sf.net
* License
Greetings,
could someone sponsor this?
http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/
It closes a few bugs, it's a switch to dh, uses quilt, builds with hardening
options.
Later on i plan to work to upload the newest version and check if the patches
need to be re-applied or fixed.
Bye
--
Salvo
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 05:57:46PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> could someone sponsor this?
>
> http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/
It's 403 so I cannot be sure it targets sid, but if it does, are you
aware of the freeze and its implications?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 673346 RFS: allegro5/2:5.0.7-1 [ITP] -- Portable library for
> cross-platform game and multimedia development
Bug #673346 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: allegro5/2:5.0.6-1 [ITP] -- Portable
library for cross-platform game and multimedia dev
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2012 16:20:05 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: cvc3/2.4.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #668398,
regarding RFS: cvc3/2.4.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
lördagen den 4 augusti 2012 18.00.04 skrev Andrey Rahmatullin:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 05:57:46PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > could someone sponsor this?
> >
> > http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/
>
> It's 403
403?
> so I cannot be sure it targets sid, but
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 06:28:56PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > could someone sponsor this?
> > >
> > > http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/
> >
> > It's 403
> 403?
All files yield 403 Forbidden.
> > so I cannot be sure it targets sid, but if it does, are y
> All files yield 403 Forbidden.
Ops, forgot to chmod the files!
> Updating a package in unstable during the freeze makes updating that
> package in testing (if needed) more complicated.
Well it's not _STRICTLY_ needed for it to go into testing, the changes are not
that important. But on the oth
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 06:57:12PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> > Updating a package in unstable during the freeze makes updating that
> > package in testing (if needed) more complicated.
> Well it's not _STRICTLY_ needed for it to go into testing, the changes are
> not
> that important.
I me
> I mean if the package that is now in testing will need to be updated with
> some urgent fix, it won't be possible to upload the fix directly into
> unstable.
I knew it wasn't going to be into testing soon and it was ok with me, but now
i am not sure wether compiling with the new hardening option
On 2012-08-04 19:22:26 +0200 (+0200), Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> I knew it wasn't going to be into testing soon and it was ok with
> me, but now i am not sure wether compiling with the new hardening
> options is a good reason for asking a freeze exception or not.
Generally, you should only seek a fr
> Generally, you should only seek a freeze exception for an upload
> containing strictly backported fixes for RC bugs and release goals.
> New upstream versions, minor bug fixes and packaging improvements
> should be omitted if you're targeting the release.
this bug[1], which is the only one that
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "razorqt".
I am a DM and I already take care of a few widely used packages, I
intend to keep this one in good shape as well. Initially I decided to
put this one into experimental, since it's
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 08:05:08PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
>
> > Generally, you should only seek a freeze exception for an upload
> > containing strictly backported fixes for RC bugs and release goals.
> > New upstream versions, minor bug fixes and packaging improvements
> > should be omitte
* Noel David Torres Taño , 2012-08-01, 18:19:
This upload is to fix an RC bug.
Some time ago it was filed a 'serious' bug against the package
kstars-data-extra-tycho2 that I maintain. The seriousness of the bug
was related to the possibility of copyright infringement. Bug number is
#681654.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Control: block 676717 by -1
Control: block 678902 by -1
User: sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: for-wheezy
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a third (and hopefully last) NMU to
sgml-base. It fixes all remaining RC menti
Processing control commands:
> block 676717 by -1
Bug #676717 [sgml-base] sgml-base produces broken super catalog when packages
are in "rc" state
Bug #675462 [sgml-base] nsgmls:/etc/sgml/mutter-common.cat:8:8:E: cannot open
"/usr/share/sgml/mutter-common/catalog
Bug #678143 [sgml-base] Broken {p
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
User: sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: for-wheezy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of package "gnomint" to fix #682432.
Package name: gnomint
Version
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 683844
Bug #683847 [release.debian.org] unblock: sgml-base/1.26+nmu4
683847 was not blocked by any bugs.
683847 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 683847: 683844
--
683847: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683847
Debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 682432 with 683845
Bug #682432 [gnomint] [gnomint] *** glibc detected *** gnomint: double free or
corruption (fasttop): 0x00c7ffd0 ***
682432 was not blocked by any bugs.
682432 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 68
Hi Manuel,
The package name is "razor-qt" on the ITP and "razorqt" on the RFS and at
mentors. Why the difference ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi Bart,
2012/8/4 Bart Martens :
> Hi Manuel,
>
> The package name is "razor-qt" on the ITP and "razorqt" on the RFS and at
> mentors. Why the difference ?
Initially I was using "razor-qt", then tried to follow upstream's
recent names in Ubuntu's PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~razor-qt/+archive/pp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 652745 by 683840
Bug #652745 [wnpp] ITP: razorqt -- simple qt-based desktop environment
652745 was not blocked by any bugs.
652745 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 652745: 683840
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please co
Your message dated Sat, 4 Aug 2012 20:30:53 +
with message-id <20120804203053.gc8...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: gnomint/1.2.1-4 [RC] [QA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #683845,
regarding RFS: gnomint/1.2.1-4 [RC] [QA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdevilspie"
* Package name: gdevilspie
Version : 1:0.5-3
Upstream Author : Islam Amer
* URL : http://code.google
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyskein"
* Package name: pyskein
Version : 0.7.1-1
Upstream Author : Hagen Fürstenau
* URL : http://packages.python.org/pyskein/
* License : GPL-3
Sect
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 682044 by 683871
Bug #682044 [wnpp] ITP: pyskein -- Python extension implementing the Skein
cryptographic hash
682044 was not blocked by any bugs.
682044 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 682044: 683871
> stop
Stopping pro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 608309 ITA: gdevilspie -- A user friendly interface for devilspie
Bug #608309 [wnpp] O: gdevilspie -- A user friendly interface for devilspie
Changed Bug title to 'ITA: gdevilspie -- A user friendly interface for
devilspie' from 'O: gdevi
Hi Andrei,
The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ? Are you still
working on this package or can this RFS be closed ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Your message dated Sun, 5 Aug 2012 05:59:17 +
with message-id <20120805055917.ga28...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: gdevilspie/1:0.5-3 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #683864,
regarding RFS: gdevilspie/1:0.5-3 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Hi Vedran,
I suggest to remove logkeys 0.1.1a+svn20120529-1 (2012-06-27 22:32) from
mentors. It is no solution for bug 679182. It also does not help to get the
bugs in wheezy fixed.
I suggest to start from logkeys 0.1.0-1, add the fix from Helmut Grohne (13 Dec
2011) for bug 624991, add a fix f
34 matches
Mail list logo
