Your message dated Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:20:08 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #683500,
regarding RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On 16 August 2012 18:38, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:21:39PM -0400, Alex Korobkin wrote:
>> 1. Download the source of my package: apt-get source liblcms2-2
> Note that we don't have Ubuntu precies as our default repo so the command
> doesn't do the same as for you. You m
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> The problem is Makefile files that are regenerated by configure called in
> the clean target.
> That these files are patched by debian/patches/debian-changes-* is another
> problem, caused by this one.
Sounds like a situation where I wo
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:21:39PM -0400, Alex Korobkin wrote:
> 1. Download the source of my package: apt-get source liblcms2-2
Note that we don't have Ubuntu precies as our default repo so the command
doesn't do the same as for you. You mean dget
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lcms2
Hi all,
I'm trying to learn how to use pbuilder, but cannot manage to build a
simple package. The pbuilder baze.tgz looks OK, it is something about
dpkg-source and quilt patches that I cannot grasp.
My steps are:
1. Download the source of my package: apt-get source liblcms2-2
It downloads the sou
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 684944 RFS: ecere-sdk/0.44.01-1 [ITP: #665332] - Ecere SDK
Bug #684944 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ecere/0.44.01-1 [ITP] -- SDK
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ecere-sdk/0.44.01-1 [ITP: #665332] - Ecere SDK' from
'RFS: ecere/0.44.01-1 [ITP] -
* Vasudev Kamath , 2012-07-30, 21:56:
It doesn't look like it's suitable for wheezy, so please make it
s/unstable/experimental/.
Done! When it should be moved to unstable? After wheezy release?
Yes, after wheezy is released.
+-$ $(tabbed -d >/tmp/tabbed.xid); urxvt -embed $(/tmp/tabbed.xid);
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:48:24PM +0200, Vedran Furač wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/logkeys
>
> But it doesn't work for me, logkeys uses 100% CPU and doesn't log
> anything, at least on Sid (someone please test).
I don't see an open bug about this problem "uses 100% CPU".
http://bug
On 08/07/2012 08:48 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Vedran,
>
> I suggest to remove logkeys 0.1.1a+svn20120529-2 (2012-08-06 23:55) from
> mentors. It "might fix the FTBFS on mips" (bug 679182), but it still does not
> help to get the bugs in wheezy fixed.
>
> I suggest to follow the approach we q
On 08/16/2012 11:42 PM, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:39:50PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>> According to its PTS ( http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html ):
>> [2011-12-03] libpam-ssh REMOVED from testing (Britney)
>> [2011-12-02] Removed 1.92-14 from
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:41:08PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> What let you think this?
Carelessness in investigating (looked at
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html, noticed that the last news
entry was removal from testing and did not read closely enough to notice the
unstable r
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> > The situation is ambiguous as I posted before in the
> > debian-de...@lists.debian.org list:
> > the package is not orphaned, was removed but it is still present.
>
> There is
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho (16/08/2012):
> There is no ambiguity. The package is present in unstable and thus is not
> "removed" in the sense that word is commonly used without qualifiers. (The
> proper way to describe what happened to the package is "removed from testing"
> -
> a release engineeri
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:39:50PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> According to its PTS ( http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html ):
> [2011-12-03] libpam-ssh REMOVED from testing (Britney)
> [2011-12-02] Removed 1.92-14 from unstable (Alexander Reichle-Schmehl)
>
> So I guess it must be
Hello:
On 16/08/12 17:31, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
The situation is ambiguous as I posted before in the
debian-de...@lists.debian.org list:
the package is not orphaned, was removed but it is still present.
There is no ambigu
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> The situation is ambiguous as I posted before in the
> debian-de...@lists.debian.org list:
> the package is not orphaned, was removed but it is still present.
There is no ambiguity. The package is present in unstable and thus is no
Hello:
On 16/08/12 08:40, Neil Williams wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:01:33 +0200
Jerome Benoit wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit
* Package name: libpam-ssh
Version : 1.97
Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer
* URL : http://pam-ssh.sourc
Hello:
On 16/08/12 11:29, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 08/16/2012 09:01 AM, Jerome Benoit wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit
* Package name: libpam-ssh
Version : 1.97
Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer
* URL : http://pam-ssh.sourceforge.net/
On 14.08.2012 22:40, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gammaray is now team-maintained by Debian KDE Extras Team and its git
> repository relocated to
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-kde/kde-extras/gammaray.git
>
> Old repo in collab-maint is not available anymore.
Great!
I noticed som
19 matches
Mail list logo
