On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:00:02AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 25/08/12 07:06, Bart Martens wrote:
Is your goal to add this package to wheezy ? The package at mentors uploaded
there on 2012-08-25 01:46 appears to have more minimal differences with
1.92-14.
My primary goal is get it back:
On 25/08/12 08:14, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:00:02AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 25/08/12 07:06, Bart Martens wrote:
Is your goal to add this package to wheezy ? The package at mentors uploaded
there on 2012-08-25 01:46 appears to have more minimal differences with
On 20:32 Fri 24 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote:
You create the empty suckless-tools_${version}.orig.tar.gz tarball
in the wrong directory.
Ok I messed up. It was fine till I didn't introduced the mktemp to
create secure tmp directory. But when I did I forgot to check where on
earth the .orig.tar.gz
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2012 07:02:18 +
with message-id e1t5anu-0006ad...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: acsccid/1.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #678107,
regarding RFS: acsccid/1.0.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Bart Martens ba...@debian.org writes:
You could, if you want that, create a package with version 1.92-15 based on
version 1.92-14, and ask debian-release to add it to wheezy.
It's very unlikely the release team will still accept a new package
in wheezy at this stage. You could however provide
Thanks for your quick reply:
Meanwhile, I realized that I can modify the Makefile.am itself.
Best wishes,
Jerome
On 25/08/12 07:39, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello:
I have to build a module that exports only symbol with a given prefix:
in the
On 20:32 Fri 24 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote:
You create the empty suckless-tools_${version}.orig.tar.gz tarball
in the wrong directory.
Fixed
Why do you redirect tar's stderr to /dev/null?
Removed this too
I recommend passing these options to tar, so that the user's
name/group/umask are not
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:24:39 +
with message-id e1t5etn-00085a...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: bwctl/1.4-1 [ITP] -- bandwidth test controller
has caused the Debian Bug report #666221,
regarding RFS: bwctl/1.4-1 [ITP] -- bandwidth test controller
to be marked
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:24:37 +
with message-id e1t5etl-00083w...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: beef/1.0.0-1 -- flexible Brainfuck interpreter
has caused the Debian Bug report #673549,
regarding RFS: beef/1.0.0-1 -- flexible Brainfuck interpreter
to be marked
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:05:45 +
with message-id e1t5f7z-0002ol...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: sptk/3.5-1 [ITP] -- speech signal processing
toolkit
has caused the Debian Bug report #667905,
regarding RFS: sptk/3.5-1 [ITP] -- speech signal processing toolkit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
unarchive 659077
Bug #659077 {Done: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org}
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
unarchive 680625
Bug #680625 {Done: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
unarchive 682968
Bug #682968 {Done: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org}
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
unarchive 661857
Bug #661857 {Done: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org}
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
unarchive 660270
Bug #660270 {Done: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org}
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
unarchive 661853
Bug #661853 {Done: Simone Rossetto simro...@gmail.com}
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
unarchive 660314
Bug #660314 {Done: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org}
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
unarchive 664181
Bug #664181 {Done: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org}
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
unarchive 659805
Bug #659805 {Done: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org}
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
unarchive 682357
Bug #682357 {Done: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org}
On 25/08/12 09:10, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Bart Martensba...@debian.org writes:
You could, if you want that, create a package with version 1.92-15 based on
version 1.92-14, and ask debian-release to add it to wheezy.
It's very unlikely the release team will still accept a new package
in
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for
the new version 2:2.24-1 of my package cl-asdf.
It builds this binary package:
cl-asdf- Another System Definition Facility
The package cl-asdf can also be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf
-
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:15:41 +
with message-id e1t5ugd-0003rz...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: pidgin-latex/1.4.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685345,
regarding RFS: pidgin-latex/1.4.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
23 matches
Mail list logo
