Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 05:14:56 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: sniffit/0.3.7.beta-17
has caused the Debian Bug report #685180,
regarding RFS: sniffit/0.3.7.beta-17
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 05:14:53 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: recoverjpeg/2.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685565,
regarding RFS: recoverjpeg/2.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 673346 RFS: allegro5/2:5.0.7-2 [ITP] -- Portable library for
> cross-platform game and multimedia development
Bug #673346 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: allegro5/2:5.0.7-1 [ITP] -- Portable
library for cross-platform game and multimedia dev
Hello Nanakos,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:05:41AM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
> On 17 Σεπ 2012, at 7:37, Bart Martens wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:06:51PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
> >>I hope my last message covers your questions.
> >I currently see on bug 685679 only the
Le Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 04:04:19PM +0200, Olе Streicher a écrit :
>
> I accidently uploaded a package to unstable (python-cpl) that should
> have gone to experimental. How can I remove that from unstable but not
> from testing?
Dear Ole,
if the presence of this package is really disruptive, you
Dear Bart,
On 17 Σεπ 2012, at 7:37, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:06:51PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
Hi Bart,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:08:18PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
Hi Nanakos,
I had a look at mpg321 at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-27
09:13.
It is
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rsplib". RSPLIB is the Open Source
implementation (GPLv3) of the IETF's new framework for Reliable Server Pooling
(RSerPool), which is described in RFC 5351 to RFC 5356. If you a looking for a
Grid compution solution which is simple, easy
Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:39:06 +0200
with message-id <50578a6a.8030...@wavecon.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#686679: RFS: asn1c/0.9.21+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- ASN.1
compiler for C
has caused the Debian Bug report #686679,
regarding RFS: asn1c/0.9.21.dfsg1-1 [ITP] -- ASN.1 compiler for C
to be
On 17.09.2012 21:41, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> AFAIK freeze doesn't affect removals in any way. So:
>
> s/ in non-freeze times//
I can confirm that. This is what Niels and Adam confirmed a few days ago.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
sig
* Arno Töll , 2012-09-15, 16:15:
ftpmaster removals do only affect Sid. They are not propagated to
Testing (even less during a freeze).
Just for the archives: I meant: They are not removed straight from
Testing by a ftpmaster removal, but Britney may propagate the change in
Testing in non-freez
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 683336 RFS: ninja-build/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
Bug #683336 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ninja-build/120715 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ninja-build/1.0.0-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
ninja-build/120715 [ITP]'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please con
11 matches
Mail list logo