Your message dated Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:30:17 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: libkaz/1.21-1 [ITP] please sponsor Kazlib upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #672307,
regarding RFS: libkaz/1.21-1 [ITP] please sponsor Kazlib upload
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:30:17 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: hwb/1:040412-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #672805,
regarding RFS: hwb/1:040412-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Dear mentors, debian-science,
I am looking for a sponsor for a new version of "ovito", which is not
targeting wheezy. The previous sponsor of ovito was Michael
Tautschnig, but Mònica Ramírez Arceda has made QA uploads recently.
* Package name: ovito
Version : 1.1.0-1~1
Upstream A
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 07:33 -0400, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> #672805: RFS: hwb/1:040412-6
>
> It has been closed by Bart Martens .
>
> email message attachment
> > Forwarded Message
> > From: Bart Martens
> > To: 672805-d...@bugs.debian.org
> > Subject: closing RFS:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:57:49AM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 07:33 -0400, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > #672805: RFS: hwb/1:040412-6
> >
> > It has been closed by Bart Martens .
> >
>
> > email message attachment
> > > Forwarded Message
> >
All,
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 09:07 -0400, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:57:49AM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 07:33 -0400, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > email message attachment
> > > > Forwarded Message
> > > > From: Bart M
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 09:07 -0400, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:57:49AM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > > email message attachment
> > > > Forwarded Message
> > > > Subject: closing RFS: hwb/1:040412-6
> > > > Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:30:17 +
> > > >
Hi,
On 27.09.2012 15:56, Robert James Clay wrote:
> Bart closing the hwb RFS sponsorship bug this morning because hwb
> had been removed from the Mentors site was the first I knew that it had
> been removed. I thought there was something in place to notify people
> about things like that?
Men
Hi Pekko Metsä,
I had a look at your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-09-27 11:46.
Why version 1.1.0-1~1 and not simply 1.1.0-1 ? Maybe I have overlooked some new
version numbering policy for experimental.
I compared this package with version 0.9.5-2, and I see more changes to the
Debia
Hi,
On 02/15/2012 04:02 AM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko
>> wrote:
>
>>> In good old days when I had time and motivation to maintain gcc-doc, I've
>>> used git repos to managed entire thin
Why not just do GCC docs in a way similar to GNU Make?
Separately build docs from separate source package, and upload to non-free?
(with regular package names)
2012/9/27 Guo Yixuan :
> Hi,
>
> On 02/15/2012 04:02 AM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
>
Arno,
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 11:32 -0400, Arno Töll wrote:
> On 27.09.2012 15:56, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > Bart closing the hwb RFS sponsorship bug this morning because hwb
> > had been removed from the Mentors site was the first I knew that it had
> > been removed. I thought there was some
Hi,
On 27.09.2012 20:08, Robert James Clay wrote:
> Arno,
>
> On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 11:32 -0400, Arno Töll wrote:
>> On 27.09.2012 15:56, Robert James Clay wrote:
>>> Bart closing the hwb RFS sponsorship bug this morning because hwb
>>> had been removed from the Mentors site was the first I k
Hi there,
I'm a Debian Developer and possibly interested in reviewing and sponsoring
this! Are you still looking?
Cheers,
-- Asheesh.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
h
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm a Debian Developer and possibly interested in reviewing and sponsoring
> this! Are you still looking?
Yes, I am! Please tell me what you think ;-)
--
http://gottengeography.ca
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mento
Hi,
On 09/28/2012 01:05 AM, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> Why not just do GCC docs in a way similar to GNU Make?
> Separately build docs from separate source package, and upload to non-free?
> (with regular package names)
It's in a similar way to GNU Make indeed. The only difference is more
than one versi
Has the FSF been asked to switch to plain GFDL so that we can move the
GCC docs to main? They did that for the autoconf documentation
recently.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
17 matches
Mail list logo