Bug#690366: marked as done (RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-5)

2012-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:07:07 -0400 with message-id <5081f93b.8030...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690366: RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #690366, regarding RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

2012-10-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Sure, I was just suggesting that it could also be removed since there > now is an open source solution. I don't think unar supports RAR file creation, I guess some people are using that. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWis

Bug#690010: marked as done (RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP])

2012-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:50:21 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #690010, regarding RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#663916: New phonetisaurus package available

2012-10-19 Thread Giulio Paci
Hi! Il 17/10/2012 16:19, Jakub Wilk ha scritto: > * Giulio Paci , 2012-10-17, 00:05: How can I set Built-Using field? Should I set it by hand? Is it possible to set it automatically? >>> Value of this field must be generated at build time. Unfortunately, there >>> are currently no conv

Bug#690589: RFS: libdigest-md6-perl/0.11-1

2012-10-19 Thread Oleg Gashev
Hi, On 10/15/12, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Besides that: > > - The two entries in debian/changelog should probably be collapsed into >one. Updated debian/changelog file. > > - The (build-)dependencies on hardening-wrapper, perl-base and >perl-modules look wrong. Why are they there? p

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

2012-10-19 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Ma Xiaojun writes: > However, "rar" is offered for long and now it is staying in a broken state. > So we still need to maintain it. Sure, I was just suggesting that it could also be removed since there now is an open source solution. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.d

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

2012-10-19 Thread Etienne Millon
* Timo Juhani Lindfors [121019 14:02]: > Etienne Millon writes: > > It still does not support RAR 3.0 archives (#312552). > > unrar-free and unar are two different packages. If you read the full bug > report you see my comment: Ooos, my bad. I had read the bug report but thought that your messa

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

2012-10-19 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Etienne Millon writes: > It still does not support RAR 3.0 archives (#312552). unrar-free and unar are two different packages. If you read the full bug report you see my comment: "unar (not unrar!) 0.99-1 in debian wheezy seems to have rar3 support." -- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

2012-10-19 Thread Etienne Millon
* Timo Juhani Lindfors [121019 13:46]: > Ma Xiaojun writes: > > RAR is not open source software, they offers binaries for i386 and > > amd64 on Linux. > > http://rarlabs.com/download.htm > > Just out of curiousity, why is this needed? The unar package in Debian > seems to work for all of the RAR

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

2012-10-19 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Ma Xiaojun writes: > RAR is not open source software, they offers binaries for i386 and > amd64 on Linux. > http://rarlabs.com/download.htm Just out of curiousity, why is this needed? The unar package in Debian seems to work for all of the RAR files I have received recently and is open source.

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

2012-10-19 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Martin Meredith wrote: > It was refused by the maintainers of that for being "to non-free" I see. Well, it was worth a shot. BTW, using pbuilder to set up i386 and amd64 chroots helps a lot, at least here it has made it easy for me to do dual-arch uploads, with two pbuilder

RFS: l2tp-ipsec-vpn (updated package)

2012-10-19 Thread Werner Jaeger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, My sponsor is kil...@debian.org. I just uploaded the new version 1.0.9-1 of my package "l2tp-ipsec-vpn". This upload contains RC bug fix #684962 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684962) * Package name: l2tp-ips

Bug#664165: Het bijhouden van uw verbruik

2012-10-19 Thread Neervoort, Teresa
U heeft overschreden de limiet van uw mailbox ingesteld door onze IT-service, en vanaf nu kan je niet ontvangen van alle inkomende e-mails en ook enkele van uw uitgaande e-mails zullen niet worden geleverd en ten slotte, uw account zal worden 'gedeactiveerd' binnen 24 uur vanaf nu. Om dit te voo

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

2012-10-19 Thread Martin Meredith
It was refused by the maintainers of that for being "to non-free" On 19 Oct 2012 01:10, "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" wrote: > On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Martin Meredith wrote: > > The problem with updating the rar package is not a problem with the > > complexity of the package, it's a case of it takes