Hi,
unfortunately you're right. Is it OK. to upload it again, with only the
changelog corrected, or do I also need a new version entry
(l2tp-ipsec-vpn (1.0.9-1.1) unstable; urgency=low) in the changelog ?
Thank you
- Werner
On 11/06/2012 10:22 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-10-19 10:23, We
Your message dated Wed, 07 Nov 2012 04:20:27 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: projectcenter.app/0.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #678150,
regarding RFS: projectcenter.app/0.6.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Wed, 07 Nov 2012 04:20:28 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: dbuskit/0.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #678037,
regarding RFS: dbuskit/0.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
On 2012-10-19 10:23, Werner Jaeger wrote:
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> My sponsor is kil...@debian.org.
>
> I just uploaded the new version 1.0.9-1 of my package "l2tp-ipsec-vpn".
>
> This upload contains RC bug fix #684962
> [...]
>
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/l2tp-ip
Jakub Wilk writes:
> Does this actually work? According to bug #448493, it does not.
Works For Me:
windlord:~> apt-cache show svnlog | grep Bugs
Bugs: mailto:r...@debian.org
windlord:~> reportbug svnlog
*** Welcome to reportbug. Use ? for help at prompts. ***
Note: bug reports are publicly arc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 654750 by 692366
Bug #654750 [wnpp] ITA: kbibtex -- BibTeX editor for KDE
654750 was not blocked by any bugs.
654750 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 654750: 692366
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
> owner 692366 thib...@debian.org
Bug #692366 [sponsorship-requests] RFS
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
> owner thib...@debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
package sponsorship-requests
owner thib...@debian.org
tag 692366 + pending
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 692366 for-wheezy not-fit-fot-wheezy
thanks
Dear Bastien,
The debdiff is enormous, because you have renamed patches an
Your message dated Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:01:25 +0100
with message-id <50990a25.5010...@gmail.com>
and subject line libpam-ssh: uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #686070,
regarding RFS: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 [ITP] [REINTRODUCTION]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Jakub Wilk writes:
> [I'm not subscribed, please Cc me on replies.]
>
> * Russ Allbery , 2012-11-05, 12:46:
>>> what can happen if a user reports a bug against one of my packages
>>> by using 'reportbug' ?
>>> Must I explicitly add 'Send-To: quid...@poivron.org' in
>>> debian/bug-control to avoid
[I'm not subscribed, please Cc me on replies.]
* Russ Allbery , 2012-11-05, 12:46:
what can happen if a user reports a bug against one of my packages by
using 'reportbug' ?
Must I explicitly add 'Send-To: quid...@poivron.org' in
debian/bug-control to avoid conflicts with Debian BTS ?
I use Bugs
On 11/6/12 5:13 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> a potential sponsor for reintroducing libpam-ssh asked me to contact you
> as previous maintainer for comments on the reintroduction version,
> which is meant to be a minimal version.
>
> A commented debdiff output is attached in such a way you can get qu
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:40:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > I have spent some time into writing a watch file for
> > >
> > > https://csb.codeplex.com/releases/
> > >
> > > but failed and some research on mailing lists revealed some other
> > > failures. Any idea whether a clever man
14 matches
Mail list logo
