Bug#688411: marked as done (sponsorship-requests: Please convert my DM upload permissions to new format)

2012-11-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:52:40 +0100 with message-id <20121107235240.GA6366@wheezy01> and subject line Re: Bug#688411: sponsorship-requests: Please convert my DM upload permissions to new format has caused the Debian Bug report #688411, regarding sponsorship-requests: Please convert m

Re: RFS: l2tp-ipsec-vpn (updated package)

2012-11-07 Thread Werner Jaeger
Hi, I've added the missing entry for 1.0.7-1 in changelog and just uploaded it successfully. -Werner On 11/07/2012 01:41 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2012-11-07 06:59, Werner Jaeger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> unfortunately you're right. Is it OK. to upload it again, with only the >> changelog correct

Re: debian/bug-control: report bug against unofficial debianpackages

2012-11-07 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 07/11/2012 15:30, bilibop project a écrit : > Hi, and thanks for your replies > > message d'origine > De: Russ Allbery > A: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > Sujet: Re: debian/bug-control: report bug against unofficial debianpackages > Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 12:46:29 -0800 >

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-11-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
Addition of debian/README.slock.Debian doesn't seem to be documented in the changelog. debian/watch contains only a single line "version=3"? Is that intentional? As far as I can see, this change is not documented in the changelog. " * Merge new version 39" - sorry, what does it mean? AFAIUI

Bug#692568: RFP: wkhtmltopdf -- Convert HTML to PDF using the WebKit rendering engine and Qt

2012-11-07 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: wkhtmltopdf Version : 0.11.0~rc1 Upstream Author : Jan Habermann, Christian Sciberras and Jakob Truelsen * URL : http://code.google.com/p/wkhtmltopdf/ * License : LGPL-3+ Programming Lang: C++ Description

Re: debian/bug-control: report bug against unofficial debianpackages

2012-11-07 Thread bilibop project
Sorry, there were errata in my previous mail. After correction, it gives: [...] does it mean that for each version, there should be TWO entries in the changelog, as: bilibop (0.4.2) unstable; urgency=low * Remove debian/bug-control -- full name $(date -R) bilibop (0.4.2~rc1) unstable; urgen

Re: debian/bug-control: report bug against unofficial debianpackages

2012-11-07 Thread bilibop project
Hi, and thanks for your replies message d'origine De: Russ Allbery A: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Sujet: Re: debian/bug-control: report bug against unofficial debianpackages Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 12:46:29 -0800 > > what can happen if a user reports a bug against one of my p

Bug#684220: RFS: tinysvm/0.09-1 [ITP] -- SVM trainer and classifier toolkit

2012-11-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Giulio Paci , 2012-11-05, 22:45: Hi Boris, Il 05/11/2012 16:02, Boris Pek ha scritto: During the process I need to create a temporary directory. Should I delete it at the end of get-orig-source? Should I delete it in clean? Yes, only tarball should be left as a result. See Debian Policy §4.

Re: RFS: l2tp-ipsec-vpn (updated package)

2012-11-07 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-11-07 06:59, Werner Jaeger wrote: > Hi, > > unfortunately you're right. Is it OK. to upload it again, with only the > changelog corrected, or do I also need a new version entry > (l2tp-ipsec-vpn (1.0.9-1.1) unstable; urgency=low) in the changelog ? > > Thank you > > - Werner > > [...]