Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 675532 RFS: bilibop/0.4.2 (ITP #675467)
Bug #675532 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: bilibop/0.4.0 (ITP #675467)
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: bilibop/0.4.2 (ITP #675467)' from 'RFS:
bilibop/0.4.0 (ITP #675467)'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> I have uploaded a package to mentors.debian.net, but I have had no response
> from the system and the package has not appeared in my list of packages yet.
Chris, this is not a valid email adress:
chris@lap-x201
Please fix your mail setup a
Hi Andrey,
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:30:22PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
I packaged the Dhrystone benchmark for Debian, as I coulnd't find a
package for it:
https://github.com/qris/dhrystone-deb
And I'd like to find a sponsor to check and maybe
Hello Eugene,
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote on 2012-11-14 19:08:
> Just like Timo said, this patch doesn't fix this (RC) problem. Fix would
> be: either apply the same idea (#if 0) to sys_linux.c or backport the
> upstream patch [1].
I have thought the problem in sys_linux.c were already solved. I w
Il 15/11/2012 17:21, Jakub Wilk ha scritto:
> * Giulio Paci , 2012-08-10, 00:44:
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yamcha/yamcha_0.33-1.dsc
>
> I tried to run the tests. Even though the final result appears to be "All 4
> tests passed", I saw things like this:
>
> *** glibc detecte
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:46:14 +0100
with message-id <20121115194614.ga5...@jwilk.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #683184,
regarding RFS: suckless-tools/39-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> I packaged the Dhrystone benchmark for Debian, as I coulnd't find a package
> for it:
>
> https://github.com/qris/dhrystone-deb
>
> And I'd like to find a sponsor to check and maybe upload it for me. Thanks
> in advance.
Chris, this is not a
On 17:08 Thu 15 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-11-15, 17:22:
> What did this line do, and why it was removed?
> find . -name config.mk | xargs sed -i 's,-s ${LIBS},${LIBS},'
> >>>Not sure why it was removed, it was not present when I took
> >>>over source from Micah
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:21:42 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: mysql-tzdata/1.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #679402,
regarding RFS: mysql-tzdata/1.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 693335 RFS: pymarkups/0.2.3-1 [ITP]
Bug #693335 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: pymarkups/0.2.3-1
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: pymarkups/0.2.3-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
pymarkups/0.2.3-1'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 687824 by 693335
Bug #687824 [wnpp] ITP: pymarkups - Wrapper around various text markups,
implemented in Python
687824 was not blocked by any bugs.
687824 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 687824: 693335
> stop
Stopping pr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 693330 RFS: mathjax/2.1+20121028-1 mathjax-docs/2.1+20121030-1
Bug #693330 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: mathjax/2.1+20121028-1;
mathjax-docs/2.1+20121030-1
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: mathjax/2.1+20121028-1 mathjax-docs/2.1+20121030-1'
fro
* Giulio Paci , 2012-08-10, 00:44:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yamcha/yamcha_0.33-1.dsc
I tried to run the tests. Even though the final result appears to be
"All 4 tests passed", I saw things like this:
*** glibc detected *** ../libexec/pkemine: free(): invalid pointer: 0x40
* Vasudev Kamath , 2012-11-15, 17:22:
What did this line do, and why it was removed?
find . -name config.mk | xargs sed -i 's,-s ${LIBS},${LIBS},'
Not sure why it was removed, it was not present when I took over
source from Micahel. After reading man page for *ld* I see that this
option
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors/pythoneers,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pymarkups". It is based on code
that has been split out of ReText so that it could be used by other apps
(including ReText export extensions).
It is a dependency of ReText 4.0, wh
Some corrections:
- The .dsc file for mathjax should be
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mathjax/mathjax_2.1+20121028-1.dsc
- I forgot to add changelog entries:
mathjax (2.1+20121028-1) experimental; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mathjax" and it's documentation
that is in "mathjax-docs" source.
* Package name: mathjax
Version : 2.1+20121028-1
Upstream Author : Design Science, Inc
* URL
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:30:22PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I packaged the Dhrystone benchmark for Debian, as I coulnd't find a
> package for it:
>
> https://github.com/qris/dhrystone-deb
>
> And I'd like to find a sponsor to check and maybe upload it for me.
> Thanks in advance.
Hi all,
I packaged the Dhrystone benchmark for Debian, as I coulnd't find a
package for it:
https://github.com/qris/dhrystone-deb
And I'd like to find a sponsor to check and maybe upload it for me. Thanks
in advance.
Cheers, Chris.
--
Aptivate | http://www.aptivate.org | Phone: +44 1223 96
On 11:18 Thu 15 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-11-13, 20:13:
> >>What did this line do, and why it was removed?
> >>find . -name config.mk | xargs sed -i 's,-s ${LIBS},${LIBS},'
> >Not sure why it was removed, it was not present when I took over
> >source from Micahel. Af
* Vasudev Kamath , 2012-11-13, 20:13:
What did this line do, and why it was removed?
find . -name config.mk | xargs sed -i 's,-s ${LIBS},${LIBS},'
Not sure why it was removed, it was not present when I took over source
from Micahel. After reading man page for *ld* I see that this option
Hi:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Lazarus Long wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> The deferred NMU uploader has canceled it in behalf of mine.
>>
>> I'm not sure how to proceed now. Should I remove my version, or should
>> it be re-evaluated as a RC b
22 matches
Mail list logo
