Bug#661831: RFS: texi2html/5.0-1 -- Convert Texinfo files to HTML

2012-12-03 Thread Francesco Cecconi
Hi Bart, sorry for the latency but I had a problems. Well, I have uploaded a new version of the package and hope that the copyright file is complete. On Wednesday 25 July 2012 19:48:19 you wrote: Hi Francesco, I had a look at your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-07-25 08:17. The

Bug#670176:

2012-12-03 Thread Nick Andrik
The problem is that I ran dput yesterday but the package dis not appear in my packages on mentor (I didn't even receive an email). I guess it got stuck somewhere in the incoming queue. I read somewhere that it takes 6 hours to get unstuck, but still no email from yesterdays' upload and I get

Bug#670176:

2012-12-03 Thread Игорь Пашев
2012/12/3 Nick Andrik nick.and...@gmail.com: The problem is that I ran dput yesterday but the package dis not appear in my packages on mentor (I didn't even receive an email). I guess it got stuck somewhere in the incoming queue. I read somewhere that it takes 6 hours to get unstuck, but still

git-buildpackage: can it recreate the orig.tar.gz without the pristine-tar?

2012-12-03 Thread Miguel Telleria de Esteban
Dear all, After several months of using git-buildpackage with the recommended pristine-tar option I still keep making myself the following question. Why does git-buildpackage need pristine-tar to generate the orig.tar.gz file?. Can't it just pick the contents from the upstream branch together

Re: Bug#670176:

2012-12-03 Thread Tony Houghton
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:27:15 +0100 Nick Andrik nick.and...@gmail.com wrote: The problem is that I ran dput yesterday but the package dis not appear in my packages on mentor (I didn't even receive an email). I guess it got stuck somewhere in the incoming queue. I read somewhere that it takes 6

Re: git-buildpackage: can it recreate the orig.tar.gz without the pristine-tar?

2012-12-03 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 03.12.2012 13:44, Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote: and it works !! so why does not git-buildpackage do this? Try: md5sum $orig_tarball_from_pristine_Tar vs md5sum $orig_tarball_recreated_from_the_upstream_branch While the /contents/ of the tarball are identical, the tarball

Re: git-buildpackage: can it recreate the orig.tar.gz without the pristine-tar?

2012-12-03 Thread Antonio Ospite
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:44:55 +0100 Miguel Telleria de Esteban mig...@mtelleria.com wrote: Dear all, After several months of using git-buildpackage with the recommended pristine-tar option I still keep making myself the following question. Why does git-buildpackage need pristine-tar to

Bug#683473: RFS: podget/0.6.7-1 - Update to version 0.6.8-12

2012-12-03 Thread Dave Vehrs
Hi all, Submitted a few updates to Debian Mentors for this package. Filed a new RFS (#694968) and was correctly informed to continue using the old one. So here goes... Addressed the errors reported by the QA process and Bart Martens. * Package name: podget Version : 0.6.8-12

Re: git-buildpackage: can it recreate the orig.tar.gz without the pristine-tar?

2012-12-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/03/2012 10:30 PM, Antonio Ospite wrote: in debian/gbp.conf there are just these lines: [DEFAULT] debian-branch = debian upstream-branch = master upstream-tag = v%(version)s By just running git buildpackage the package builds fine, and the .orig.tar.gz

Re: git-buildpackage: can it recreate the orig.tar.gz without the pristine-tar?

2012-12-03 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 01:44:55PM +0100, Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote: Why does git-buildpackage need pristine-tar to generate the orig.tar.gz file?. It doesn't and it's even not enabled by default. Can't it just pick the contents from the upstream branch together with version number

Re: git-buildpackage: can it recreate the orig.tar.gz without the pristine-tar?

2012-12-03 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 03:30:09PM +0100, Antonio Ospite wrote: In my limited experience if the upstream project uses git already and _tags_ stable releases it is very easy to avoid using pristine-tar It's also very easy to avoid it in any other workflow: just don't enable it. There is no

Re: git-buildpackage: can it recreate the orig.tar.gz without the pristine-tar?

2012-12-03 Thread Miguel Telleria de Esteban
Thanks everybody for your answers. After some review on my files and seeing your responses I can see that: * The orig.tar.gz was not created because the debian/changelog version lacked a - to differentiate upstream_version from debian versions. As a result gbp considered my

Bug#684434: RFS: yamcha/0.33-1 [ITP] -- General purpose chunker annotator

2012-12-03 Thread Giulio Paci
Il 02/12/2012 15:56, Jakub Wilk ha scritto: * Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com, 2012-12-01, 20:45: I decided to push my git repository to collab-maint. You can find it here: Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/yamcha.git Vcs-Browser:

Re: git-buildpackage: can it recreate the orig.tar.gz without the pristine-tar?

2012-12-03 Thread Russ Allbery
Miguel Telleria de Esteban mig...@mtelleria.com writes: * In a pure git storage scenario, pristine-tar doesn't add much benefit since we can always generate an orig.tar.gz from an upstream tag and obtain the same result... ... or maybe subsequent git-buildpackage invocations may

Re: git-buildpackage: can it recreate the orig.tar.gz without the pristine-tar?

2012-12-03 Thread Miguel Telleria de Esteban
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:11:56 -0800 Russ Allbery wrote: Miguel Telleria de Esteban writes: ... or maybe subsequent git-buildpackage invocations may generate md5sum different .orig.tar.gz?? I guess not (although I will check). Every time you generate an *.orig.tar.gz file from