On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:34:25PM +1100, Cameron Hart wrote:
> I have contacted the current maintainer and they're OK with me adopting the
> package.
>
> Does the current maintainer need to Orphan/RTA the package first or can I
> just file a new ITA bug?
If there is an agreement then you can sim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 696337 wishlist
Bug #696337 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: dualword/1.2.0 [ITP] [new package]
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
696337: http://
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 696337 RFS: dualword/1.2.0 [ITP] [new package]
Bug #696337 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: dualword/1.2.0 [new package]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: dualword/1.2.0 [ITP] [new package]' from 'RFS:
dualword/1.2.0 [new package]'
> stop
Stopping pr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 695255 by 696337
Bug #695255 [wnpp] ITP: dualword -- foreign language vocabulary trainer
695255 was not blocked by any bugs.
695255 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 695255: 696337
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 696337 RFS: dualword/1.2.0 [new package]
Bug #696337 [sponsorship-requests] Subject: RFS: dualword/1.2.0 [new package]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: dualword/1.2.0 [new package]' from 'Subject: RFS:
dualword/1.2.0 [new package]'
> stop
Stopp
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Cameron Hart wrote:
> I have contacted the current maintainer and they're OK with me adopting the
> package.
Great :)
For the rest of the tasks, see this page:
http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
> Does the current maintainer need to Orphan/RTA the pack
I have contacted the current maintainer and they're OK with me adopting the
package.
Does the current maintainer need to Orphan/RTA the package first or can I
just file a new ITA bug? I've been looking at various wiki pages and
existing ITA bugs but they're generally renaming an existing O or RTA
New review:
Since there were no blocking issues, I have uploaded this. It will
soon be in NEW, where it will be re-checked for legal issues before
reaching Debian itself.
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Some things you might want to fix for the next version
You may want to run wrap-and-so
Hi,
Thank you for the Makefile.
I have made all the changes.
The new release 1.7.1-3 is available at
http://www.miceamaze.org/source-packages/debian/
Bye,
Rapahel
2012/12/12 Paul Wise
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Raphael Champeimont wrote:
>
> > Well, for the moment I'm just trying to pa
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 06:56:12PM +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:12:45AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:09:00PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Daniel Martí wrote:
> > > > Is there any packaging team I s
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:12:45AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:09:00PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Daniel Martí wrote:
> > > Is there any packaging team I should contact? Should I start using
> > > collab-maint on anonscm.debian.org fo
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:09:00PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Daniel Martí wrote:
> > Is there any packaging team I should contact? Should I start using
> > collab-maint on anonscm.debian.org for its packaging right away?
>
> The packaging work will surely require you to c
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Daniel Martí wrote:
> Is there any packaging team I should contact? Should I start using
> collab-maint on anonscm.debian.org for its packaging right away?
The packaging work will surely require you to create a bunch of ruby gems
so you might want to joint the ruby extras team
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 08:57:41AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:44:00PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > [ CCing debian-mentors in the hope to find someone who is willing to
> > package this software ]
> >
> > On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > > Package:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:44:00PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> [ CCing debian-mentors in the hope to find someone who is willing to
> package this software ]
>
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: gitlab
> > Version
[ CCing debian-mentors in the hope to find someone who is willing to
package this software ]
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: gitlab
> Version : 1.2.0 (+git...)
> Upstream Author : Dmitriy Zaporozhets
> * URL
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:35:53 +
with message-id <20121219083553.gi1...@cave.achos.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#696291: RFS: nexus/4.3-svn1863-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #696291,
regarding RFS: nexus/4.3-svn1863-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
se...@iit.edu wrote:
> Hi Tobias:
>
> I'll sponsor it.
>
> Carlo
Thank Carlo, that was quick!
Tobias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201212190835
18 matches
Mail list logo
