On 02/04/2013 09:50 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> What's with the renaming (Please add a REAMDE.source for explanation thanks) ?
>
> $ uscan --verbose --force-download
> [...]
> Newest version on remote site is 1.4.1, local version is 1.4.1+repack1
> => remote site does not even have current
On 02/04/2013 09:50 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> What's with the renaming (Please add a REAMDE.source for explanation thanks) ?
>
> $ uscan --verbose --force-download
> [...]
> Newest version on remote site is 1.4.1, local version is 1.4.1+repack1
> => remote site does not even have current
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Maykel Moya wrote:
> 1. ulogd vs ulogd2 package name.
> I'm not sure why the ITP was filled changing the package name. It's true
> the file format has changed but it has changed before too between
> versions 1.02-2 and 1.23-1.
> I've decided to use the existing pack
Il 24/01/2013 01:53, Jakub Wilk ha scritto:
> * Giulio Paci , 2013-01-14, 02:32:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sequitur-g2p/sequitur-g2p_0.0.r1668-1.dsc
>>> The license has this additional clause:
>>>
>>> Should a provision of no. 9 and 10 of the GNU General Public License be
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pycdio"
* Package name: pycdio
Version : 0.18-1
Upstream Author : Rocky Bernstein
* URL : https://savannah.gnu
El 04/02/13 18:28, Maykel Moya escribió:
> 3. migrating d/copyright to DEP5
> Current copyright is here[2] and I would like to migrate it to DEP5.
> From my previous experience it's enough to specify the upstream license
> in the 'Header paragraph' and then a 'Files paragraph' for debian/* files.
Hello
I'm trying to package the last ulogd version (2.0.1) and I'm willing to
maintain/adopt it in the long run (disclaimer: I'm not a DD neither a DM).
[cc'ed both current ulogd maintainer and reporter of ulogd2 ITP[1]]
I have some doubts with respect to packaging:
1. ulogd vs ulogd2 package n
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 13:45 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 01:32 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> >b43-fwcutter itself is just a firmware cutter as its name suggests.
> >http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/b43#Install_b43-fwcutter
>
> The thing is that absolutely nothing h
Le 16/07/2012 11:17, Slavko a écrit :
> Dear mentors,
>
> Dňa Sun, 15 Jul 2012 09:54:17 + (UTC) mentors.debian.net
> napísal:
>
>> Your package nbc all versions has been removed from mentors.debian.net
>> for the following reason:
>>
>> Your package found no sponsor for 20 weeks
>
> I was p
I don't indent to sponsor this package, but here's a quick review:
* Roger Light , 2013-02-02, 22:52:
* Bumped standards release to 3.9.3. No changes needed.
Lintian says:
W: mosquitto source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.3 (current is 3.9.4)
* Debhelper bumped to version 9 to help fi
Package looks pretty good !
Some quick comments:
What's with the renaming (Please add a REAMDE.source for explanation thanks) ?
$ uscan --verbose --force-download
[...]
Newest version on remote site is 1.4.1, local version is 1.4.1+repack1
=> remote site does not even have current version
-- Sc
2013/2/4 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> On 02/04/2013 01:32 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:25 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>> wrote:
>>
>>> No, unfortunately the package is not ok yet. When I install the package
>>> b43-fwcutter, it will prompt the debconf question in Spanish.
On 02/04/2013 01:32 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:25 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
No, unfortunately the package is not ok yet. When I install the package
b43-fwcutter, it will prompt the debconf question in Spanish.
Really?
Where to check the source package content?
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pfm"
Package name: pfm
Version : 2.0.7-1
Upstream Author : Willem Herremans
URL : http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pfm/
License : GPL-2
Section : misc
14 matches
Mail list logo
