RFS: asio [O] (#583862)

2013-02-22 Thread Markus Wanner
Dear Mentors, several moons ago, I offered to adopt the asio package, see #583862. Despite several attempts to ping Simon, I didn't get any answer since he offered to sponsor the package. I have to admit I didn't pursue this further, either. Mostly due to lack of motivation to nag people. (I'm

Re: RFS: awstats/7.1~dfsg-1 (2nd try)

2013-02-22 Thread Sergey Kirpichev
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: I think I could be convinced to do at least a onetime upload of the package. Thank you. Let's hope someday I can handle package myself, as before. https://mentors.debian.net/package/awstats

Bug#701021: RFS: tinywm

2013-02-22 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, I have not gotten in touch from Mateusz on this matter. Best regards, Nobuhiro On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: retitle 701021 RFS: tinywm/1.3+git11122012.b663a26b83-1 stop (Removing [NMU] from the title.) Hi Mateusz, Did you get permission

Bug#701021: RFS: tinywm

2013-02-22 Thread Bart Martens
retitle 701021 RFS: tinywm/1.3+git11122012.b663a26b83-1 stop (Removing [NMU] from the title.) Hi Mateusz, Did you get permission from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu to update tinywm and to add yourself to Uploaders ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#701021: RFS: tinywm

2013-02-22 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
W dniu 22.02.2013 o 21:14 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org pisze: retitle 701021 RFS: tinywm/1.3+git11122012.b663a26b83-1 stop (Removing [NMU] from the title.) Hi Mateusz, Did you get permission from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu to update tinywm and to add yourself to Uploaders ? Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#667904: RFS: mitlm/0.4-1 [ITP] -- MIT Language Modeling

2013-02-22 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com, 2013-02-21, 12:11: Any chance upstream makes a release with this new ABI soon? I just asked. Waiting for a reply. Paul and I decided that I will be responsible for the next upstream release, so yes, we can expect a release with this new ABI soon, Great.

Bug#693556: RFS: mercurial-keyring/0.5.4-2 [ITP]

2013-02-22 Thread Christoph Mathys
On 19.02.2013 22:27, Jakub Wilk wrote: The license text in d/copyright is not correctly formatted. Please see bug #700970. I updated d/copyright according to one of the good examples. Thanks. dget -x

Bug#701194: RFS: dparser-1.29-1 [ITP] -- a scannerless GLR parser generator

2013-02-22 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch, 2013-02-22, 17:08: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dparser/dparser_1.29-1.dsc Lintian emits: W: dparser source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.3 (current is 3.9.4) lintian4python emits: e: python-dparser: string-exception

Bug#700360: RFS: openfst/1.3.3-1 -- weighted finite-state transducers library

2013-02-22 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com, 2013-02-20, 20:46: As far as I can see, src/test/fst_test.h creates temporary files insecurely. Relevant applications are now using private directory to store temporary files. As far as I can see, this solves the issue. It solves it for Debian, but the

Bug#701194: RFS: dparser-1.29-1 [ITP] -- a scannerless GLR parser generator

2013-02-22 Thread Markus Wanner
X-Debbugs-Cc: package-sponsorship-reque...@lists.debian.org Oops, sorry, please find Jakub's review in #668966, the former (and now archived) RFS bug. Not in the ITP issue #668556, as wrongly stated. Thanks Markus Wanner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#701194: RFS: dparser-1.29-1 [ITP] -- a scannerless GLR parser generator

2013-02-22 Thread Markus Wanner
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, dear python gurus, I am still looking for a sponsor for my package dparser, now upgraded from 1.26 to 1.29. * Package name: dparser Version : 1.29-1 Upstream Author :

Bug#687479: marked as done (RFS: cantata/0.8.3.1-1 [ITP])

2013-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:45:42 + with message-id e1u8yyw-0005pm...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: cantata/0.8.3.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #687479, regarding RFS: cantata/0.8.3.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#689500: marked as done (RFS: python-eventlib/0.1.0-1 [ITP])

2013-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:45:42 + with message-id e1u8yyw-0005pa...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: python-eventlib/0.1.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #689500, regarding RFS: python-eventlib/0.1.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#699734: marked as done (RFS: pfm/2.0.7-1)

2013-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:02:15 + with message-id 2013000215.gb3...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS: pfm has caused the Debian Bug report #699734, regarding RFS: pfm/2.0.7-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#698432: marked as done (RFS: pfm/1.5.4-2)

2013-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:02:15 + with message-id 2013000215.gb3...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS: pfm has caused the Debian Bug report #698432, regarding RFS: pfm/1.5.4-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Re: RFS: asio [O] (#583862)

2013-02-22 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Markus, as I understood from #583862, you have found a sponsor for the package, right? Anyway, there are some technical notes on the package. 1) Use DEP-3 for patches (at least Description, Author, Last-Update). 2) Remove the fix-makefile.patch, which is not listed in debian/patch/series 3)

Bug#701017: marked as done (RFS: evilwm/1.1.0-1)

2013-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2013 07:02:37 + with message-id e1u9981-0003sj...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: evilwm/1.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #701017, regarding RFS: evilwm/1.1.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#700814: marked as done (RFS: autoconf-archive/20111221-2 [RC])

2013-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2013 07:02:39 + with message-id e1u9983-0003sr...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: autoconf-archive/20111221-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #700814, regarding RFS: autoconf-archive/20111221-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you