Hi,
Il 10/03/2013 21:09, Eric Lavarde ha scritto:
Hi,
On 10/03/13 20:17, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Hi Sven, hi Eric,
Il 10/03/2013 19:59, Sven Joachim ha scritto:
On 2013-03-10 19:26 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
On 10/03/13 18:48, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Configuration item 'binary:polsarpro
Hi Seven,
Il 10/03/2013 21:47, Sven Joachim ha scritto:
On 2013-03-10 21:09 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
On 10/03/13 20:17, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Il 10/03/2013 19:59, Sven Joachim ha scritto:
A valid possibility would be to reverse the roles and dependencies:
rename polsarpro to polsarpro
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:29:09 +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote:
> >Configuration item 'binary:polsarpro Depends:2' has a wrong value:
> >dependency 'polsarpro-bin (<< ${source:Version}.1~)' does not match
> >grammar
> >
> >
> >Should I care about it?
> Not about the "unkno
Hi Arno,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi Prach,
>
> as promised here is a review for libapache2-mod-geoip.
>
>
> * Please consider upgrading to new style (dh >= 7) rules style. It makes
> life easier to you and is more forward oriented. That said, your rules
> file looks o
Here is a review:
You seem to have sent this RFS bug to debian-mentors instead of
submit@bugs.d.o, please read this:
http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS
I would suggest that a non-native package would be more appropriate
here, please change debian/source/format to 3.0 (quilt) and change the
versi
On 2013-03-11 09:57 , Paul Wise wrote:
> Here is a review:
Thanks, very useful stuff!
Various things where already fixed, others have been fixed. See inline
for the specifics and the major question of maybe splitting the repo
into a 'fixes' and 'debian' one, where the latter is just the debian
pa
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
I note your email address puts you in Switzerland, if that is true I
hope you plan to join us at DebConf13:
http://debconf13.debconf.org/
> That was done because there is an existing bug[1] and I wanted to avoid
> creating a new bug, which t
Hi,
Il 11/03/2013 08:33, gregor herrmann ha scritto:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:29:09 +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote:
[CUT]
In conclusion the solution suggested in [1] is actually valid and
the cme warning can be safely ignored in this case.
[1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/not-binnmuable-all
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my RC bug fix of "php-soap" (#701134)
* Package name: php-soap
Version : 0.12.0-2.1
Upstream Author : Jan Schneider
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/SOAP/
* Lice
9 matches
Mail list logo
