Hi Giulio,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 02:22:39AM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote:
> >git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sequitur-g2p.git
> >
> > I'd rather recommend to join Debian Science team because it is definitely
> > related and you can get additional support.
>
> Jakub Wilk seems interested
Hi Andreas,
thank you very much for your interest in sequitur-g2p.
Il 16/04/2013 11:43, Andreas Tille ha scritto:
> I missed your initial ITP but now I became aware of the package. I also
> noticed that you are doing the packaging in
>
>git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sequitur-
* Eriberto , 2013-04-24, 17:57:
Thus I' ve a doubt now. Should I keep the original name in tarball
(rename) and in the binary (renamex)?
I don't have opinion about the source package name, but I would
certainly keep the binary name.
The regex.h is used!
Are you sure? I just prepended
#err
Hi Jonathan and Jakub,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Thus I' ve a doubt now. Should I keep the original name in tarball
(rename) and in the binary (renamex)?
I don't known about versioning scheme changes. Thanks.
The regex.h is used! The regex.c no. But I think I needn't change the
upstream tarb
Hi Stuart,
Thanks for your reply. I will explain my choise. There are some
differences between rename and re-name.
Firstly, re-name is C compiled and it adds performance. I used re-name
in the last year to rename about ~300 milions of files on four
servers. It was made several times. I tested oth
Thanks a lot! I have sponsored and this package.
But I uploaded the package into experimental due to a freeze-period.
Your changes are pushed into VCS [1].
For the future uploads, please, consider rewriting debian/rules in a
nicer "override_*" style.
Cheers,
Anton
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org
Thank you a lot, Anton!
Following your suggestion earlier, I was trying to adopt snake4. It's on
#581387 now.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Ok, Alexandre, I have sponsored your package.
> Please, consider also an adopting of snake4 package to get some more
> packaging e
Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:13:05 +0200
with message-id <517820b1.1080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#706049: RFS: nsnake/1.5-1 [ITP] -- classic snake game
with textual interface
has caused the Debian Bug report #706049,
regarding RFS: nsnake/1.5-1 [ITP] -- classic snake game w
Ok, Alexandre, I have sponsored your package.
Please, consider also an adopting of snake4 package to get some more
packaging experience and to help Debian.
Best regards,
Anton
On 04/24/2013 03:32 PM, Alexandre Dantas wrote:
> Hi Anton, thanks for replying!
>
> This package has textual interface
* Giulio Paci , 2013-04-14, 13:21:
Using "except" without specifying exception type is bad idea:
http://docs.python.org/2/howto/doanddont.html#except
Added 1008_avoid_except_usage_without_type.patch. The situation is not
very much different anyway, as the patch just replaces "except" with
"exce
(I don't intend to sponsor this package. Sorry!)
* Jonathan Dowland , 2013-04-24, 11:21:
I'm also not clear on why you've renamed the upstream name from rename
to re-name. You claim in README.Source:
It is a generical name and was modified to re-name to be introduced in
Debian.
"rename" is
Hi Anton, thanks for replying!
This package has textual interface. So, unlike the snake-package already on
Archive, it requires no X libraries or a graphical session. It can simply be
played directly through the ttys or from a ssh session, being a nice
distraction
during a system crash/restore.
>
Hi, I'd like to echo Stuart Prescott in #706043, and Simon McVittie
on -devel¹: I don't normally complain about archive bloat too much
but in this case re-name looks very superfluous.
I'm also not clear on why you've renamed the upstream name from
rename to re-name. You claim in README.Source:
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
