Hi Miklos,
On your package at mentors uploaded there on 2013-02-21 22:01 :
http://mentors.debian.net/package/sysadmin-guide
The directory debian.orig shouldn't be there.
I suggest to use debhelper and compat higher than 8.
I suggest to remove this from debian/copyright, because such
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The current mytop package is pretty old and the package was set to O
some days ago. I've recreated the package with the latest upstream
version available, checked and applied if necessary the debian patches
from the old debian
Il 09/04/2013 12:59, Jakub Wilk ha scritto:
Lintian emits:
X: libmitlm0: shlib-calls-exit usr/lib/libmitlm.so.0.0.0
I believe this is true-positive. exit() is indeed called in some methods that
are part of public API:
NgramLM::Initialize
NgramModel::LoadComputedFeatures
They should
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 11:40:31AM +0200, Werner Detter wrote:
Hi,
* URL : http://www.mysqlfanboy.com/mytop/
Unreachable from here currently, when have you reached that site the
last time?
* Checked and recreated patchs from old upstream against new version
- Add
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xboxdrv
* Package name: xboxdrv
Version : 0.8.5-1
Upstream Author : Ingo Ruhnke grum...@gmx.de
* URL : http://pingus.seul.org/~grumbel/xboxdrv/
* License
Hi Andrey,
I would sponsor your package, but it seems, md5sum of your tarball is not
the same as of original one. Did you repack it?
Thanks,
Anton
2013/5/5 Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package calcelestial
Package name: calcelestial
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Steffen Vogel p...@steffenvogel.de
URL : https://github.com/stv0g/calcelestial
License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package exactimage
* Package name: exactimage
Version : 0.8.8-1
Upstream Author : Rene Rebe r...@exactcode.de
* URL : http://dl.exactcode.de/oss/exact-image/
* License
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 04:09:11PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
I would sponsor your package, but it seems, md5sum of your tarball is not
the same as of original one. Did you repack it?
I didn't repack it, I generated the tarball from the upstream git tag.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Hi,
recreated an uploaded the package due to some more reported bugs which have
been addressed by
the new upstream version.
* New upstream release (Closes: #590505, #538164, #565759, #558100,
#500078)
* New Maintainer (Closes: #704450)
* Updating standards version to 3.9.4
*
On Sunday 05 May 2013 18:16:26 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Do you need a sponsor ?
Yes, I am searching for a sponsor:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org wrote:
[...]
I am looking for a sponsor for my package exactimage
I am a Debian Maintainer, but my only upload
Hi,
* URL : http://www.mysqlfanboy.com/mytop/
Unreachable from here currently, when have you reached that site the
last time?
Yesterday as I started with the package yesterday and downloaded the
sources from there.
Uh fun to review ... I find the naming of patch 10 a bit
Your message dated Sun, 05 May 2013 16:22:46 +
with message-id e1uz1i2-0006cu...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: fadecut/0.1.3-1 (post Wheezy RFS)
has caused the Debian Bug report #703693,
regarding RFS: fadecut/0.1.3-1 (post Wheezy RFS)
to be marked as done.
This means that
On 05/05/2013 05:04 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 04:09:11PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
I would sponsor your package, but it seems, md5sum of your tarball is not
the same as of original one. Did you repack it?
I didn't repack it, I generated the tarball from the
Sorry, forgot to mention. I used an original tarball from the upstream's
website. There are no differences between yours and original's one. Only
md5sum was different.
Cheers,
Anton
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, 05 May 2013 16:46:30 +0200, Steffen Vogel wrote:
Package name: calcelestial
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Steffen Vogel p...@steffenvogel.de
URL : https://github.com/stv0g/calcelestial
License : GPL
Section : utils
dget -x
Your message dated Sun, 05 May 2013 19:22:41 +0200
with message-id 51869561.1060...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#706858: RFS: xboxdrv/0.8.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #706858,
regarding RFS: xboxdrv/0.8.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi,
I'm rewriting the old debian/rules file and will let you know as soon
as there is an updated version on mentors.
best,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hello,
I'm in the process of converting my packages into the canonical
copyright format[1]. I believe I understood the syntax and standard
licenses like GPL are no problem.
However, I have several non standard licenses, like [2], [3], [4] with
some files from the FSF having a very restrictive
Hi,
I've the mentioned modifications and moved most of the stuff in debian/rules
from the old
manual way to debhelper functins where possible. See the new changelog entry:
* New upstream release (Closes: #590505, #538164, #565759, #558100,
#500078)
* New Maintainer (Closes: #704450)
*
Hm,
the Binary is not installed in /usr/bin ... well, done for today I will
look at this soon.
Regards,
werner
Am 05.05.13 20:52, schrieb Werner Detter:
Hi,
I've the mentioned modifications and moved most of the stuff in debian/rules
from the old
manual way to debhelper functins where
On Sun, 05 May 2013 20:45:50 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Looking
at [1] I only see a finite list of licenses and for those cases (as
far as I could determine) none matches. Unfortunately there is no
value like other to mark those license(s). How should/could I
proceed to switch over
In data domenica 05 maggio 2013 19.27.44, Anton Gladky ha scritto:
Sorry, forgot to mention. I used an original tarball from the upstream's
website. There are no differences between yours and original's one. Only
md5sum was different.
How can it be different if the file is identical?
--
Salvo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I am looking for a sponsor for the chinese-checkers package.
http://xdat27.ce.chalmers.se/~salvo/tin171/chinese-checkers_0.3-1.dsc
The client part uses PyQT4 for the interface. The server is written in erlang.
it builds a client
Hi All
I posted a new tentative Debian package here:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/rfc5766-turn-server
I'd appreciate the feedback.
Thanks !
Oleg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
25 matches
Mail list logo
