Your message dated Sun, 21 Jul 2013 04:23:30 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: estonianidcard/3.7.0.1116-1 [ITP] -- Estonian ID
card support packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #702174,
regarding RFS: estonianidcard/3.7.0.1116-1 [ITP] -- Estonian ID card support
packages
Hi.
I uploaded a new version for Superkb, the package for which I'm trying to
get sponsorship.
The new version is 0.22-5 and this is what I changed:
superkb (0.22-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Added lintian override for no-upstream-changelog, because it is not
in English and this has been fix
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libpam-ssh-agent-auth".
I'v already sent the sponsor request previously, ref,
http://lists.debian.org/package-sponsorship-requests/2013/package-sponsorship-requests-201307/msg00087.html
This is a new upload.
* Package name: libpam-ssh
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libpam-ssh-agent-auth".
I'v already sent the sponsor request previously, ref,
http://lists.debian.org/package-sponsorship-requests/2013/package-sponsorship-requests-201307/msg00087.html
This is a new upload.
* Package name: libpam-ssh
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 18:17:20 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I think these are the changes to the debian/rules in your mind, right?
>>
>> [ . . . ]
>
> Pretty close. . .
Thanks a lot again Paul for all the helps you gave.
My sponsor request has been sitting there for a while,
http://bugs.debian
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 19:58:52 +0300
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#706514: RFS: dcraw/9.17-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #706514,
regarding RFS: dcraw/9.19-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Hi Oliver,
[Quoting your private mail to me, hoping there is nothing private]
2013/7/19 Oliver Sander :
>> You want to upload
>> a newer version without intend to maintain it. Right?
>>
> No. I made up my mind and I promise to be the dcraw maintainer if that
> is what it takes.
The package cann
On 20-07-13 16:29, T o n g wrote:
>> - Simple: add the build-arch and build-indep targets yourself. If I am
>> not mistaken, with this specific rules file, you can just add them,
>> depend on the build target and do nothing in the target itself.
>
> After a bit of struggle, I think these are the c
Hi,
I update the package to version 2.4. A build of the package can be
found under [0], the git repo of the package is under [1].
Best regards,
Julian
[0] http://rbw.goe.net/jw/debian/pool/powertop/
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/jw-guest/powertop.git
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 08:26:48 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> line, I put them there because I want to fix the following lintian
>>> issues:
>>>
>>> W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-
>>> target build-arch
>>> W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: debian-rules-missing-r
Hi,
and thanks for this review
On 19/07/2013 20:25, intrigeri wrote:
> First, was the target distribution change in debian/changelog
> intentional? (0.4.12 has experimental, 0.4.13 has unstable.)
Yes it is; the target distribution was set to experimental for the
wheezy's freeze duration... after
11 matches
Mail list logo
