Bug#723582: RFS: metar/0.2-1 ITP

Same as with dcl : Please first fix all the lintian warnings. Fernando schrieb: >Package: sponsorship-requests >Severity: normal > >Dear mentors, > >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "metar" > >* Package name: metar > Version : 0.2-1 > Upstream Author : Fernando Iazeolla >

Bug#723583: RFS: avt/0.2-1 ITP

Same as with dcl : Please first fix all the lintian warnings. Fernando schrieb: >Package: sponsorship-requests >Severity: normal > >Dear mentors, > >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "avt" > >* Package name: avt > Version : 0.2-1 > Upstream Author : Fernando Iazeolla >* UR

Bug#723584: RFS: dcl/0.1-1 ITP

Halo Fernando, (i'm not a DD) Some first look at the package soley at mentors: - copyright (and d/copyright) file ist missing (make sure always to run lintian best with pedantic and experimental options) - please fix all lintian warnings. (I count 7 - you need to file an itp bug and close it in

Bug#723652: marked as done (RFS: autoconf-archive/20130609-2 [)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:23:59 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: autoconf-archive/20130609-2 [ has caused the Debian Bug report #723652, regarding RFS: autoconf-archive/20130609-2 [ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

An Analysis of the RFS Process

I was curious about the current efficacy of the BTS-based RFS process, and so created some charts[1] to provide visibility. The state classification used for the chart data is not completely vetted, but I believe it to be good enough to identify trends. The RFS Activity chart[2] shows a open RFS c

Bug#723175: [SoB osgearth] Vcs is not up to date

Hi Andreas, On 09/18/2013 03:32 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi again, > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:45:00PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> I'll merge the changes for jessie into master and push it to git.debian.org. > > Only cosmetic hints: > > debian/rules: > - > > overrid

Bug#723582: ITP missing for package metar with RFS 723582 with ITP in title

According to [0], metar has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 723582 title. Please, could you file this ITP bug? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Bug#707595: RFS: xnoise/0.2.18-1 [ITP]

Dear mentors, I have updated the package to the new upstream release 0.2.19: New source control file location is: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xnoise/xnoise_0.2.19-1.dsc (Debian) changes since the last upload: - Change taginfo dependency name accordingly [1]. - C

Bug#723175: [SoB osgearth] Vcs is not up to date

Hi Bas, On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:59:22PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:45:00PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > >> Thanks for looking into osgEarth so shortly before you VAC. > > > > Well, forcing people to wait is demotivating ... and I want to push a

Bug#707594: RFS: libtaginfo/0.1.6-1 [ITP]

Dear mentors, I have updated the package. Changes since last update are: * Renaming libtaginfo-c0 and libtaginfo-c0-dev to libtaginfoc0 and libtaginfoc0-dev (with lintian override). This is according to the naming of taglib itself. Thank you for looking at this package! Regards Dominiqu

Bug#723175: [SoB osgearth] Vcs is not up to date

On 09/18/2013 03:11 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Bas, > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:45:00PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Thanks for looking into osgEarth so shortly before you VAC. > > Well, forcing people to wait is demotivating ... and I want to push a > bit on the motivation side,

Bug#723652: RFS: autoconf-archive/20130609-2 [

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf-archive" Package name: autoconf-archive Version : 20130609-2 It builds those binary packages: autoconf-archive - Autoconf Macro Archive autoconf-gl-macros - Autoconf Ope

Bug#723175: [SoB osgearth] Vcs is not up to date

Hi again, On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:45:00PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > I'll merge the changes for jessie into master and push it to git.debian.org. Only cosmetic hints: debian/rules: - override_dh_clean: dh_testdir -$(RM) -rf build/ -$(RM) debia

Bug#723175: [SoB osgearth] Vcs is not up to date

Hi Bas, On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:45:00PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Thanks for looking into osgEarth so shortly before you VAC. Well, forcing people to wait is demotivating ... and I want to push a bit on the motivation side, right. ;-) > On 09/18/2013 01:25 PM, Andreas Tille wrote

Bug#716852: package review

hello package reviewers, (this is a copy of the mail i originally sent to the itp instead of the rfs, as i originally overlooked the rfs. this also explains why some of the points i mention are the same as mentioned by paul earlier). i'm having a look at your libpam-ssh-agent-auth package, as i'd

Bug#723175: [SoB] Vcs is not up to date

Hi Andreas, Thanks for looking into osgEarth so shortly before you VAC. On 09/18/2013 01:25 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > on SoB Wiki page[1] you asked for sponsering your package. I checked > out VCS via > > gbp-clone ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/osgearth.git > > and found an old version

Bug#723175: [SoB] Vcs is not up to date

Hi Bas, on SoB Wiki page[1] you asked for sponsering your package. I checked out VCS via gbp-clone ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/osgearth.git and found an old version there which is lagging behind mentors[2] please commit everything to VCS to make sure it is in sync with what you intend